IBM App Connect vs Rivery comparison

IBM and Rivery are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.2, while Rivery is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 5.1% mindshare in CDI, compared to Rivery’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rivery users who would recommend it.

IBM App Connect

Read 25 IBM App Connect reviews

2,482 Views
1,390 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rivery

Read 2 Rivery reviews

574 Views
172 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

Rivery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

IBM App Connect and Rivery compete in the data integration space. While IBM App Connect offers competitive pricing, Rivery is favored for its advanced features.

Features: IBM App Connect offers seamless integration of cloud and on-premise applications, automation capabilities for optimizing workflows, and comprehensive integration across multiple systems. Rivery provides data pipeline management, supports real-time solutions for modern data infrastructure, and offers effective transformation and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM App Connect ensures a straightforward deployment with a strong support structure for enterprise integration. Rivery focuses on rapid, intuitive deployment and maintains responsive customer service, emphasizing user-friendly operations.

Pricing and ROI: IBM App Connect is cost-effective, offering competitive pricing with focus on long-term ROI through effective integration. Rivery, with a higher initial cost, delivers substantial ROI driven by its feature-rich, tailored pipeline solutions and operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM App Connect vs. Rivery Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. Rivery

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,077 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rivery

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (35th), Migration Tools (4th), Cloud Migration (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM App Connect is 5.1%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rivery is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Transforms data efficiently and navigates licensing challenges with ease

The transition between version 12 and version 13 presents some challenges. While version 12 had approximately 10 features, version 13 includes around 200 features with cloud platform compatibility. The learning curve for developers moving from version 12 to 13 could be smoother. When using new components, better context explanations would be beneficial. In version 13, accessing new features requires connecting through a web browser, which can be challenging to understand. The explanation of new features could be more user-friendly.

Read full review

reviewer2335923

Senior Operations Analyst at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides users with an initial setup phase, which is fairly simple to manage

I don't know what could be improved in terms of what my company was used to previously or after moving over to Rivery. I have not had much experience with platforms other than Rivery. For me, Rivalry was a way to step up from what we used. To be honest, I am not really sure what improvements could be made in Rivery. Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better. I am not aware if there are additional packages for smaller organizations, but if there are no packages available, then maybe that would be a good way to introduce something new in the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the security."

"There is a friendly interface for configuration, and integration is made easy."

"It can handle API conversions with mapping and transformation rules, simplifying the development process."

"The solution is very fast-paced when it comes to making things right. We can quickly download what we need if we need any app migrations for our software business. We can download it plenty of times when we need to use it. It gives us very high speed for delivering any development."

"Technical support is good."

"App Connect's best feature is that it can be deployed in a container."

"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."

"It's stable to use, connect with the cloud, and to deploy."

More IBM App Connect pros

"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."

"The solution's most valuable features are that it is quick to connect and simple to use."

Cons

"The addition of string functionality would be a benefit, particularly in the ESQL space that IBM already uses internally."

"IBM App Connect occasionally crashes for various reasons, requiring problem-solving intervention."

"When we do a version upgrade of the system, the platform is kind of complicated."

"IBM needs to enhance and have a stronger offering for the event streaming part because this is the future needed for the containerization and the new integration requirement."

"Updates are constantly delayed."

"I've been using IBM App Connect for about twenty-five years, and while I like it, there are some areas for improvement. The trace policy is ridiculous, and the biggest issue is the cost—it's expensive. People would use it much more if the price point weren't so high."

"IBM App Connect should improve security features."

"One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient."

More IBM App Connect cons

"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."

"Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better."

"IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products."

"The licensing cost for IBM App Connect is very high."

"App Connect is not cheap."

"It is very expensive if we want to scale."

"The cost depends upon the consumer."

"Initially, App Connect was quite expensive because the cost was based on the number of processors we used. However, it's now based on containers, which means we can be more specific about our consumption and get a better price."

"The solution's pricing isn't cheap, but you can get good discounts based on your competitive deal."

"I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

Configuration time varies by implementation. For insurance companies with simple JDBC connections, the process is straightforward. However, companies requiring multiple configurations for ODBC, JDB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

I am a developer specializing in IBM App Connect. We have a customer interested in comparing ESB tools, such as webMethods, which was previously owned by Software AG company before IBM acquired the...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rivery?

The tool's price can be a little steep for a small organization. I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rivery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rivery?

My company has started to use the Rivery extract data from Hive. It is like a project management sort of program, and we started to use Rivery to get the data from there over into Mavenlink, so we ...

See all answers

Comparisons

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Compared 34% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 20% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Process Orchestration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

dbt vs Rivery

Compared 56% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Rivery

Compared 44% of the time

More Rivery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect

July 2025

Download IBM App Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

July 2025

Download Rivery product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

No data available

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

IBM

Rivery is a serverless, SaaS DataOps platform that empowers companies of all sizes around the world to consolidate, orchestrate, and manage internal and external data sources with ease and efficiency.

By offering comprehensive data solutions and partnering with complementary technology providers, including Google, Snowflake, Tableau, and Looker, Rivery enables data-driven companies to build the perfect ecosystems for all their data processes.

Rivery

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. Rivery

July 2025

Free Report: IBM App Connect vs. Rivery

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM App Connect vs. Rivery and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM App Connect vs. Rivery report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.