No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hyperglance vs PerfectScale comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyperglance
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PerfectScale
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
25th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
1.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Hyperglance is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PerfectScale is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hyperglance0.8%
PerfectScale1.4%
Other97.8%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Raj kuruhuri  - PeerSpot reviewer
Founding Member at Flash
Cloud governance has improved and teams optimize costs with automated real-time visibility
Hyperglance features help in codeless automation, which means we can fix common issues and optimize resources without doing any coding. Hyperglance has positively impacted our organization by helping us with agentless and self-hosted deployments, which has saved 38% time for deployments that we used to do manually. The automated process has saved us time and money as we cut resources. In the metrics we have tracked, we have saved 22% in costs. The time and cost savings from Hyperglance have allowed our team to focus on other projects and improved our workflow. Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features. We have saved a lot of time and resources by reducing the manual work which the new team needs to do. Now the team is occupied in other work and they are more productive, providing us more user stories in the organization.
reviewer2750058 - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps & FinOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Gain visibility into Kubernetes clusters and optimize resource allocation based on historical data
I think they should focus more on Kubernetes features that allow on-the-fly resource allocation without the need to restart services. They should implement this in their autoscaler to make it more useful in scenarios that require immediate scaling up or down. They should also offer more options for visualizing graphs in different ways, such as tabular views.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hyperglance provides all these, but the configuration and use depend on your goals."
"Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features."
"Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features."
"At my organization, Hyperglance has positively impacted us by saving costs as it identified unused resources that we could delete, which saved us money."
"Hyperglance provides visibility that creates a unified view of the entire cloud system, allowing us to debug much faster than we were able to initially."
"The best features Hyperglance offers in my experience are real-time 3D visualization, FinOps and cost optimization, no-code automation, and unified cloud view."
"Hyperglance on the Up to 3,000 Resources Pay as You Go plan has improved our organization by giving us a much clearer visibility into our cloud infrastructure."
"Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] provided a visual representation of our cloud resources and usage, showing which EC2 instances were underutilized or overprovisioned, and recommended resizing the instances based on actual usage, which led to a reduction of 30% to 35% in cloud spending."
"Automated resource optimization using different policies based on the environment enabled the organization to achieve infrastructure cost savings."
"PerfectScale made our Kubernetes optimization effortless; it found wasted resources, lowered our cloud costs, and improved performance almost instantly."
"The cluster and workload autoscaler gives us the ability to have control over all the workloads' resources instead of managing them one by one."
"Automated resource optimization using different policies based on the environment enabled the organization to achieve infrastructure cost savings."
 

Cons

"The current limitations in Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] are heavily focused on cloud environments and may not offer the same visibility in hybrid infrastructure."
"From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design. They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it."
"Hyperglance could be costly for someone with simple infrastructure."
"One area where Hyperglance could improve is performance speed when dealing with very large environments, as sometimes the visual maps take longer to load."
"Hyperglance can be improved by providing a less steep learning curve."
"The learning curve can be a challenge for new users, which is something that can be improved."
"The learning curve can be a challenge for new users, which is something that can be improved."
"With their in-place optimisations, stateful set optimisation would be a great addition."
"I think they should focus more on Kubernetes features that allow on-the-fly resource allocation without the need to restart services."
"At the beginning, the support was not very impressive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
27%
Insurance Company
26%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Transportation Company
8%
Insurance Company
32%
Construction Company
27%
Healthcare Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyperglance?
To estimate the setup cost, I consider my current billable resource count, including instances, databases, and network resources, plus expected growth over the next 12 months. I choose a tier that ...
What needs improvement with Hyperglance?
From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design. They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it. The reaso...
What is your primary use case for Hyperglance?
I have been using Hyperglance for the past two to three years. I use Hyperglance primarily for cloud management and FinOps platform management. Additionally, I use it for the unified multi-cloud vi...
What needs improvement with PerfectScale?
With their in-place optimisations, stateful set optimisation would be a great addition.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Hyperglance: Up to 1000 Resources
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyperglance vs. PerfectScale and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.