Fivetran vs Syniti Data Replication comparison

Fivetran and Syniti are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while Syniti is ranked #13. Fivetran holds a 4.8% mindshare in DR, compared to Syniti’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Syniti users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 27 Fivetran reviews

224 Views
131 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Syniti Data Replication

Read 1 Syniti Data Replication review

280 Views
68 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Syniti Data Replication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fivetran and Syniti Data Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Replication Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Cloud Data Integration (6th)

Syniti Data Replication

Ranking in Data Replication

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 4.8%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Syniti Data Replication is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

reviewer1489908

Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Easy to use and deploy, user-friendly, and minimally intrusive

We are in the Philippines, and the support that we are getting is from France or Italy. We are in a different time zone, and sometimes, it can take five hours or more than five hours to get a response from them, but overall, their support is good. Most of our problems were solved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic."

"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"The ease of setting up the connectors and transformations is highly valuable."

"The portal is very intuitive and easy to use."

More Fivetran pros

"Syniti Data Replication is very easy to use. It is user-friendly and easy to set up. You can provide or create connections with just a simple click. It is minimally intrusive."

Cons

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"In our case, we ultimately did not end up using Fivetran because we were able to do custom connects at a lower cost compared to Fivetran. From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

More Fivetran cons

"There should be an option to easily create tables from its graphical user interface. Its price should also be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"The solution is affordable."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"I don't have any visibility on the price because I am on the technical side, but based on what our client said, it is more expensive than other products. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Glue vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

July 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2025

Download Syniti Data Replication product report

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

Syniti Data Replication (formerly DBMoto) software makes it easy to implement heterogeneous Data Replication, Change Data Capture, and Data Transformation capabilities — without the need for consulting services. Deploy and run powerful data replication features through an easy to use GUI and wizard-based screens — no stored procedures to develop, no proprietary syntax to learn, and no programming on the source or target database platforms.

Syniti

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Peri, McDougall Energy, JAS Forwarding, EFCO Corporation, Banco Bicsa

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.