Fivetran vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Fivetran and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1, while SAP is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.5. Fivetran holds a 2.0% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 28 Fivetran reviews

4,168 Views
2,542 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

976 Views
625 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and Fivetran compete in the data replication and integration space. Fivetran appears to have an advantage due to its adaptable integration options and user-friendly experience.

Features: SAP Replication Server supports high-volume data replication, real-time data synchronization, and advanced data compression. Fivetran emphasizes easy integration with automatic schema detection and managed connectors for numerous data sources. SAP offers enterprise-level control, while Fivetran focuses on simplicity and automation.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could reduce technical expertise requirements and enhance user experience. Improving documentation and support accessibility may be beneficial. Fivetran may enhance data filtering capabilities, increase customization options, and refine real-time syncing features for larger datasets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Replication Server requires significant technical expertise and support for deployment and maintenance. Fivetran, with its cloud-based model, offers simplified deployment without extensive technical prerequisites. Both platforms have reliable customer service, though Fivetran's straightforward onboarding and assistance processes provide ease for those requiring minimal deployment friction.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server involves higher upfront costs, justified by its enterprise-grade capabilities with potential for substantial long-term ROI in large environments. Fivetran offers a more accessible pricing model aligning with its simplified service, providing a quicker ROI through reduced setup complexity and ongoing maintenance. SAP demands high initial investment, whereas Fivetran's budget-friendly approach suits various organizational sizes.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (7th)

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.0%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fivetran	2.0%
SAP Replication Server	0.6%
Other	97.4%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Vigneswar Jeyaraj

Manager at InfoCepts

Real-time data replication and integration streamline processes and enhance productivity

The most valuable feature of Fivetran so far is the data replication. The real-time data replication is what I see best in the market where it reduces the overhead of customers needing to maintain the pipeline. Even when an error occurs, it automatically tries to solve the issue without manual interaction needed. The effectiveness of Fivetran's pre-built connectors in enhancing my customer's productivity is significant because everything is easily configurable. The documentation is very clear, so there's no difficulty in finding the necessary steps. Everything is pre-documented. The pre-built connectors that are available are excellent. Most functionalities are covered, and in most cases, it works according to expectations.

Read full review

Imran Rafi

SAP HXM & Integration consultant at Kaar Technologies

Foolproof stability and robust system

SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience. One of its notable features is real-time replication, which ensures that data changes are replicated immediately. This is particularly advantageous when we need to execute full processes promptly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"Overall, I would rate Fivetran nine out of ten."

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

More Fivetran pros

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

Cons

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

"If Fivetran can build in more transformations, that would be really helpful in my opinion."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations. A valuable aspect of the product is that it does inflight transformations and that could be expanded."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

More Fivetran cons

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Replication Server?

It's a pretty good product and stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Replication Server?

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to repl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Replication Server?

It's basically to transfer data from one server to another. It's used for this purpose.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 11% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 26% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 26% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 18% of the time

Ignite ETI vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 9% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

September 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

September 2025

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

Information and data-driven insight is what powers business today. But to get the most from your enterprise data, you need a way to bring transactional, streaming, social media, and other data together – regardless of its format and whether it’s structured or unstructured – and be able to analyze it. The challenge is moving, replicating, and centralizing a wide variety of data efficiently, cost-effectively, and quickly enough to meet business demands for active insight. SAP® Replication Server® can help. SAP Replication Server enables the continuous movement of mission-critical application data.

SAP

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server

September 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.