Fivetran vs QoreStor comparison

Fivetran and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Quest Software is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Fivetran holds a 4.8% mindshare in DR, compared to Quest Software’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

5,550 Views
500 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

QoreStor

Read 9 QoreStor reviews

3,227 Views
387 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

QoreStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

QoreStor and Fivetran compete in the data management sector, focusing on data protection and integration respectively. While QoreStor leads in data efficiency and security, Fivetran excels in data integration and transformation capabilities.

Features: QoreStor provides deduplication, compression, and encryption, optimizing storage and enhancing security. Fivetran shines with automated data integration, transformative capabilities, and extensive connectors, ensuring robust data integration.

Room for Improvement: QoreStor could enhance flexibility in integration with third-party tools and simplify its pricing structure. Fivetran might improve data transformation capabilities outside its standard offering, add more custom connector options, and refine its error-handling processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QoreStor offers versatile deployment through appliances or virtual servers, supported by direct technical customer service. Fivetran's cloud-based deployment allows rapid implementation and has comprehensive support, offering easier integration and maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: QoreStor's pricing is capacity-based, which can lead to higher initial costs, but its ROI benefits arise from reduced storage needs. Fivetran's consumption model ties pricing to data volume, offering predictable costs and a transparent ROI focused on efficient data processing.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. QoreStor Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. QoreStor

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,955 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

QoreStor

Ranking in Data Replication

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (52nd), Disk Based Backup Systems (8th), Storage Software (4th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (29th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (20th), Copy Data Management (6th), File and Object Storage (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 4.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QoreStor is 3.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fivetran	4.8%
QoreStor	3.9%
Other	91.3%

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

Jeff Manuszak

CTO at EDSI

Cost-efficient, highly scalable, and installable on different types of hardware

They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved. We are pretty lenient as we do a lot of IT support ourselves. We are not very hard on support organizations, but when a customer has a support issue, it would be easier if the support processes were a little bit more automated. It would be beneficial to have an easier way to upload diagnostic dump files. They can make it easy for the customer to collect the diagnostic data. There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field. This is especially critical because it stores customers' backups, and a failure can have significant business impacts. If a customer does not have the backups and has a disaster, they can be out of business, so monitoring is key.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"The most important feature of the solution is its ability to build data pipelines in less time."

"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

"Overall, I would rate Fivetran nine out of ten."

"Fivetran's technical support is really good, and if you're on their enterprise plan, they usually respond within an hour and keep you continuously updated on progress."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

More Fivetran pros

"I would rate QoreStor a ten out of ten for what it offers for the price."

"Not having to be onsite to swap tapes on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, alone, has really paid for its usage through the savings in time."

"It integrates with various backup software solutions, which makes it compatible with existing backup workflows and processes."

"Data deduplication and replication would be the top two features. The encryption and cloud tiering are also attractive for the future."

"This software solution can be installed on many different types of hardware, which makes it very flexible. We can run it on virtual machines or virtual servers, providing convenience for solutions of varying sizes, from small to large."

"Overall, it simplifies the management of backup and gives me a more secure feeling that my data is going to be available if I need to retrieve it."

"Quest QoreStor definitely saved us money."

"Quest QoreStor is very stable compared to our previous solution."

More QoreStor pros

Cons

"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

"An in-line data quality checking capability is missing"

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

"It can get expensive if you're sending a lot of data through Fivetran."

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

"More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

More Fivetran cons

"The management interface is in need of improvement. The graphical user interface (GUI) for the web management tools appears clunky, and not super intuitive."

"There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field."

"The ransomware protection of QoreStor could use improvement."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity. Other than that, they're doing a pretty good job."

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial."

More QoreStor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a backup of your data. You know that replication and backups are different, right? Re...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're using it actively (maybe just as much as data replication, to be honest). We absolutely ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what about the copies you don't need? Like it's unavoidable for some of the copies to get da...

See all answers

Comparisons

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

More QoreStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

April 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor

April 2026

Download QoreStor product report

Also Known As

No data available

QoreStor

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

QoreStor optimizes storage costs through advanced deduplication and compression, seamlessly integrating with backup infrastructures and supporting diverse hardware. It enhances data security with replication and offers flexible deployment with minimal maintenance.

QoreStor offers significant benefits in deduplication, which leads to space savings and reduced storage expenses. This system integrates effortlessly with backup platforms like NetVault and Veeam, functioning as a reliable backup target for both on-premises and cloud environments. The ease of integration is complemented by its replication capabilities, which add a layer of data security by enabling geographically dispersed backups. Its cloud tiering functionality extends storage capabilities, ensuring cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. While enhancements are needed in areas like Cloud Tier support, Air Gap features, and GUI intuitiveness, the continued developments aim to further optimize storage and backup solutions.

What are QoreStor's key features?

Deduplication and Compression: Achieves high deduplication rates and space savings.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse backup infrastructures.
Replication: Facilitates data security through multi-location backups.
Cloud Tiering: Extends storage capabilities efficiently.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires low maintenance efforts.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing and optimized storage.
Storage Optimization: Reduces storage needs with advanced data handling.
Flexibility: Supports diverse hardware and deployment options.
Data Security: Enhances protection with robust replication features.

QoreStor is widely implemented in industries for backup and restore operations, providing data deduplication and compression as key functionalities. Its integration as a backup target across platforms like NetVault and Veeam makes it ideal for enterprises that require efficient data management and storage cost control. Many organizations utilize its features to optimize cloud storage seamlessly while focusing on internal data handling or acting as service resellers.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. QoreStor

April 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. QoreStor

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. QoreStor and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. QoreStor report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.