Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025
SonicWall Capture Client and Huntress Managed EDR compete in the endpoint detection and response category. Huntress Managed EDR often takes the lead with its advanced features despite being more expensive, as its robust security measures can justify the higher cost for businesses requiring comprehensive protection.
Features: SonicWall Capture Client offers layered threat protection, integration with Capture ATP, and rollback capabilities. Huntress Managed EDR provides managed threat hunting, incident response, and continuous monitoring. Huntress's proactive threat management and 24/7 SOC support make it appealing for businesses needing thorough coverage.
Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client may need improvement in enriching user experience and enhancing integration capabilities beyond its existing infrastructure. It could also offer features like more intuitive threat categorization. Huntress Managed EDR could improve by expanding OS support and simplifying the interface for all users. Enhancing its integration with third-party tools would also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client excels in environments already using SonicWall infrastructure, supported by adequate customer service. Huntress Managed EDR provides smooth deployment and is praised for its responsive support, appealing to businesses focused on service efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client is cost-effective with competitive pricing offering good ROI, attracting budget-conscious buyers. Huntress Managed EDR, although priced higher, justifies its cost with significant returns due to its comprehensive features and security capabilities. Its premium price point provides greater long-term value for organizations prioritizing robust threat defense.
To learn more, read our detailed
Huntress Managed EDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: September 2025).
