Huawei eSight vs Pandora FMS comparison

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

861 Views
642 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huawei eSight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Pandora FMS and Huawei eSight compete in network monitoring and management. Huawei eSight appears to have an edge due to its superior feature set, though Pandora FMS is more attractive for cost-efficiency.

Features: Pandora FMS provides all-in-one monitoring with effective problem resolution and unifies network management tasks. It is versatile, supports multiple platforms, and offers both agent-based and agentless monitoring, interacting with diverse applications and sending SMS alerts. Huawei eSight consolidates monitoring tasks into a single solution with strong integration for Huawei devices. With efficient dashboard features like hardware alarms, users find it integrates smoothly with existing Windows infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: Pandora FMS can be resource-heavy and complex to configure, especially on Linux. Users suggest better cloud deployment and third-party integration. Simplifying the community version's capabilities and refining user interaction is recommended. Huawei eSight could improve flexibility and automation features, as well as wireless scanning and reporting. Better documentation to support independent solution finding is also suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pandora FMS offers hybrid cloud and on-premises deployment, with strong community and responsive support. However, communication is mostly online. Huawei eSight, being strictly on-premises, provides efficient support with proactive problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: Pandora FMS offers competitive pricing with an open-source version, lowering barriers for small to medium-sized deployments, and includes comprehensive updates for cost-effectiveness. Huawei eSight's pricing varies based on competition but aligns with Huawei infrastructure, providing good value in ROI performance, though some find the cost steep.

To learn more, read our detailed Huawei eSight vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Huawei eSight vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Huawei eSight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

34th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (9th)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

40th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (41st), Server Monitoring (16th), Log Management (40th), Cloud Monitoring Software (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Huawei eSight is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Gary Strydom

Desktop Analyst at Transnet

Used to monitor devices and provides the hardware alarms feature

Huawei eSight has helped me overcome many monitoring aspects of the hardware. From a single view, I can monitor all the hardware. Instead of logging on to each piece of hardware and monitoring it individually, I can monitor them from one single point. I would recommend the solution to other users because it provides a single point of view of the hardware. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it supports all our Huawei devices. Unlike other network monitoring tools that monitor Huawei devices, it provides more details when it comes to monitoring or management. We can get complete details about the devices, and management is also simple."

"One of the most beneficial features of Huawei eSight is its simplicity and ease of use."

"The product is stable."

"Huawei eSight provides businesses with monitoring capabilities of network devices across your network."

"We use Huawei eSight to monitor devices like Wi-Fi controllers, LAN switches, and routers."

"The most important features are alarm management and the visualization of the health of our network devices."

"We can scale the solution."

"I like the real-time location monitor or RTLS feature. It is similar to the monitoring feature in Cisco Prime."

More Huawei eSight pros

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"The solution has good dashboards and graphics."

"Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them."

"What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it."

"I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly."

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

"The most valuable feature is that it is an all-in-one monitoring system."

"The most valuable features are auto-discovery and automatic detection of the network topology and network monitoring."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"eSight has many features and options, but sometimes, we feel that it should be more advanced, like Cisco. It would be good if they can enable some automation part in eSight. Most of our customers want automation in their network. They don't want a dependency on everything. That's why the automation part must be improved in Huawei. It will be beneficial for customers. Cisco has different products, and there are multiple products for monitoring, automation, etc. In the software-defined network, Cisco has ACI, and VMware has NSX. Such options must be there in Huawei to move to a software-defined network. Unlike Cisco, in the case of eSight, there is only one product. I am not aware of any other product. It would be good to enhance it with at least some automation options so that we can use it effectively in the campus network or big data center environment. When I implemented this Huawei solution, I faced some limitations in particular areas like wireless scanning. This is another part that they can improve. Wireless reporting option is not as effective as other monitoring solutions. For a particular use case, if a customer is asking for some reports, sometimes they are not 100% satisfactory. The reporting structure must be improved."

"It is not a very flexible product."

"It will be better if they can make the simple network topology part more presentable. It would also be better if they had API integration and integration with third-party devices."

"The variety of license types should be made simpler as, at present, it is complex."

"Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange."

"This solution could be improved by offering monitoring for all devices and not only Huawei devices."

"The solution needs to improve it's user interface to make it more modern and stylish. They need to design proper menu positions, features, etc. Right now the layout is complicated."

"Something that could be improved is the lack of integration with Cisco switches. In the next release, I would like to see better reporting."

More Huawei eSight cons

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"A nice feature in the next release would be an automation module to run workflow actions."

"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"This solution requires proper training to get 100% out of it."

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"We would like the real-time monitoring of an interface to be improved within this solution."

"I would like for the solution to be faster and have a better tolerance between parallel servers for Pandora and Pest Control."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing. The pricing depends on which features you use and can become expensive."

"Pricing depends on the competition. If your competitor is like Cisco, then Huawei is much more competitive when it comes to pricing."

"The price is very expensive."

"The pricing for Huawei eSight is reasonable, especially with the base license and incremental licenses for additional devices. However, the variety of license types can be a bit complex. We used to sell eSight but switched to another solution, so we're not actively trading it anymore."

"Its pricing is better than any other Huawei product. Some products are cheaper in Huawei, and some products are cheaper in Cisco. Cisco has more benefits and options than Huawei if you consider different network environments."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Huawei eSight?

We use Huawei eSight to monitor devices like Wi-Fi controllers, LAN switches, and routers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huawei eSight?

Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huawei eSight?

We use the solution to monitor the hardware environment of our data center. We mainly use Huawei eSight to monitor the devices. It assists in monitoring our devices in terms of utilization and moni...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Huawei eSight

Compared 26% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Huawei eSight

Compared 24% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Huawei eSight

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Huawei eSight

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs Huawei eSight

Compared 6% of the time

More Huawei eSight Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 31% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 22% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Network Management Applications

Download Huawei eSight product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Overview

Huawei's eSight is a unified software suite for planning, operating, and maintaining complex enterprise ICT infrastructure from global, converged networks and data centers to multimedia and video communications that includes the facilities necessary for delivering performance and IT services. eSight provides a platform that supports infrastructure and devices from third-party providers, to develop custom management applications and improves O&M efficiency.

Huawei

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Sample Customers

Marina Bay, CITIC Pacific Mining

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Huawei eSight vs. Pandora FMS