HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs IBM XIV comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #11. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.5% mindshare in MS, compared to IBM’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

18,803 Views
5,077 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

IBM XIV

Read 6 IBM XIV reviews

1,015 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

IBM XIV

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

IBM XIV and HPE 3PAR StoreServ are competing products in enterprise storage solutions. HPE 3PAR StoreServ tends to have the upper hand with its advanced features, although IBM XIV is notable for its cost-effectiveness.

Features: IBM XIV offers easy scalability, robust data protection, and predictable latency which makes it suitable for dynamic environments. HPE 3PAR StoreServ provides advanced virtualization, efficient data storage optimization, and tiered storage to enhance performance and utility. Additionally, its intuitive management and robust architecture support complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: IBM XIV could enhance its initial setup process and expand its feature set to include more advanced data handling options. Improvements in licensing flexibility could also make it more attractive. HPE 3PAR StoreServ, on the other hand, could work on reducing its higher upfront costs. Enhancing user simplicity and optimizing support responsiveness could also benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers a streamlined deployment process with proactive customer support, which aids in smoother organizational transitions. In contrast, IBM XIV provides straightforward setup steps but often requires more initial effort. The proactive service model of HPE gives it an edge in deployment efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: IBM XIV is attractive for budget-conscious enterprises with its lower setup costs and favorable ROI due to economical scaling. HPE 3PAR StoreServ, although requiring higher initial investment, offers long-term value from advanced features and data efficiency that justify its cost. The principal financial distinction is HPE's higher initial expenditure offset by potential operational ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. IBM XIV Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. IBM XIV

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

NAS (6th), All-Flash Storage (10th)

IBM XIV

Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 13.5%, up from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM XIV is 3.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	13.5%
IBM XIV	3.6%
Other	82.9%

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

Ajith Kandaramage

IT Operation Engineer at HNB

Good value for money but issues with modular scaling

IBM XIV's most valuable features are NVME, especially when it comes to de-duplication, compression, and responsiveness I've been using IBM XIV for two and a half years. IBM XIV is stable. IBM XIV's scalability is adequate for our requirements, but because it's modular, you can't scale to larger…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When compared with the 3PAR, there has been huge cost savings which resulted in the ROI being achieved."

"One of the reasons that we use HPE is because they tend to provide a quality product with all the latest advances in technology; so, its storage level, things like deduplication, all-flash array, real-time replication."

"The most valuable feature to me is its reliability."

"It is easy to use and understand. It is also very stable."

"This solution is stable and reliable, it has good performance and we have a team of three to monitor the 3PAR on a daily basis."

"3PAR is very much reliable; in these four years, I've not raised a single ticket with HPE regarding 3PAR."

"The organization was able to consolidate disparate storage environments into a single chassis with multiple connection types, utilize the different disk tiers across all software/hardware connected platforms, all the time providing the fastest disk to the most utilized portions of storage as determined by the controllers."

"The solution is easy to install."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"IBM XIV is attractive because it gives value for money in terms of features."

"As it spreads, a chuck of 1MB across the board means using all available spindles on the backend."

"IBM XIV's most valuable features are NVME, especially when it comes to de-duplication, compression, and responsiveness."

"Very easy to produce reporting data (Snaps). Very easy and fast for provisioning devices and Remote mirroring."

"Implementing Remote mirroring and local Snaps is very easy."

"The product is exceptionally reliable and very easy to manage."

"XIV setup is very straightforward and easy to configure."

"Installation is amazingly easy."

More IBM XIV pros

Cons

"One big thing I would like to see is to be able to promote a virtual volume while it's still exporting."

"I would like it to be cheaper."

"With me being a 3PAR person, my struggle with HP is that when I know more about the product they still take me to the level one person, which wastes my time."

"We are waiting for compression."

"Support has gone down a little bit in the past few years."

"Generally, the management of the multiple systems that we have is really the only problem, always having to go to all these separate tools to manage everything."

"Stability got off to a rocky start."

"If HPE 3PAR could handle NAS and all things related to NAS, you would not need to have a mixture of different storages, storage boxes, one solution could fit all."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"I would rather have a web GUI served directly from the unit, and a CLI accessible directly through SSH."

"Management accessibility. Both the GUI and the CLI require installation of a Java-based thick client, which is ridiculous, plus a drain on resources."

"Until the drive is replaced, the pool_resizing is locked. This has been an issue a lot of times, especially when the contract says IBM will not replace disks until three drives fail."

"I guess we'd like to see the XIV keep pace with how storage is going in terms of speed and latency."

"This product was not a good fit for our organization as we have a ton of latency sensitive applications and XIV was not able to keep up with IO + latency demand."

"Until the drive is replaced, the pool_resizing is locked."

"The change form synchronous mirroring to asynchronous (and vice versa) without reconfiguration from scratch would be helpful."

"I encountered stability (performance) issues during enclosure or disk rebuild. Also some power supply issues due to malfunctions of circuits. Sometimes "internal" Snap sessions hang and consume pool capacity."

More IBM XIV cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is a bit high for adding another tree, but when we purchased it, it was okay with us. We had compared it with EMC and other solutions, and it was okay at that point in time. Our storage has a lifespan of seven to eight years. When you purchase it, you need to keep a headroom of around 40% to 50%. After three to four years, you generally plan for an upgrade. The price is not so bad today for two years or so, and within a year, I might find that I have to upgrade or increase the storage. This usually happens when there is a radical change or a new application has come that is consuming a lot of data, but generally, there is a plan for the amount of data that we generate and the storage upgrade."

"Our licensing cost are $32,000 annually."

"We don't pay for any licensing fees."

"This solution is expensive. We pay every year for support. It's a lump sum because we pay for data center support services, and everything is included in one."

"Nowadays, from a storage point of view, there are so many vendors in the market. So cost is one of the factors that pushed us to go with HPE 3PAR. Cost-wise they're pretty competitive."

"It is a bit more expensive. IBM is cheaper than HPE in Turkey."

"The main issue with 3PAR right now is its cost problem. Right now, there are some other storage cabinets that can do what 3PAR can do. Now, they can do it as well with a more revised budget."

"We went with 3PAR because we have HP-UX systems. Since we already knew HP-UX, they offered us a significantly cheaper solution than the one that we had for storage."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"If you are going to use the product behind an SVC, IBM will price the units lower, since you are likely not to use any of the advanced copy services."

"Licensing is straightforward."

"We have a five-year total cost of ownership where we pay an initial amount and then annually for maintenance."

"No-license-required policy, unlike others where you need a license for everything. Just pay once and forget about licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

XIO Hyper ISE vs IBM XIV

Compared 20% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs IBM XIV

Compared 19% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs IBM XIV

Compared 13% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM XIV

Compared 12% of the time

Dell EqualLogic PS series vs IBM XIV

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM XIV Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

September 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

August 2026

Download IBM XIV product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

XIV

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM XIV is a high-performance storage solution designed to meet the needs of businesses requiring efficient data management and scalability. It offers a reliable and flexible storage architecture that is easily scalable and highly secure.

IBM XIV provides enterprise-grade storage capabilities with a focus on simplicity and resilience in data storage. It supports dynamic scaling, allowing businesses to adapt to growing data requirements seamlessly. Designed to deliver high availability and efficient data protection, it integrates well with existing IT environments. Utilizing a grid architecture, IBM XIV ensures data is distributed evenly for optimal performance and reliability. Its intuitive management features reduce complexity in data handling.

What features make IBM XIV stand out?

Grid Architecture: Ensures data distribution across the system for improved performance and reliability.
Dynamic Scaling: Adapts to increasing data loads seamlessly.
High Availability: Maintains consistent access and operation with built-in redundancies.
Efficient Data Protection: Provides robust security measures for safeguarding critical information.
Intuitive Management: Simplifies setup and operational management with user-friendly features.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines data management processes, reducing time and effort.
Cost-Effective Scalability: Scales operations without significant additional investment.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data with robust security protocols.
Reduced Downtime: Ensures continuous operations with high availability.

Organizations in sectors like finance and healthcare turn to IBM XIV for its reliable data management and storage efficiency. Its ability to dynamically scale and efficiently handle large volumes of data makes it suitable for industries that demand quick data access and secure storage. Implementation is tailored to integrate with sector-specific compliance and demands, making it adaptable to unique operational environments.

IBM

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Celero, NaviSite, Technische Universit_t Mªnchen, Netflix Inc., Muhr und Bender KG, Pelephone Communications

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. IBM XIV

September 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. IBM XIV

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. IBM XIV and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. IBM XIV report.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.