Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

Hillstone Networks and F5 are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Additionally, 100% of Hillstone Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.
Hillstone S-Series Network ...
Read 1 Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System review
  • 319 Views
  • 258 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on May 4, 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform and Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System compete in the network security domain. Hillstone takes the lead with its extensive features, which appeal to those investing in comprehensive intrusion prevention.

Features: Threat Stack offers cloud monitoring, threat detection, and real-time visibility in cloud-hosted environments. Hillstone S-Series provides intrusion prevention capabilities focusing on network-level threat mitigation. Hillstone's comprehensive feature set is suited for diverse enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Threat Stack is known for quick deployment flexibility in cloud settings. Hillstone stands out with superior customer service and deployment support for complex infrastructures. Customers find Hillstone responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Threat Stack offers cost-effective pricing for startups and medium-sized businesses aiming for quick cloud security. Hillstone requires a higher initial investment, which is justified by strong ROI for large enterprises needing robust network security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hillstone S-Series Network ...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (22nd)
Threat Stack Cloud Security...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1080873 - PeerSpot reviewer
Complements any firewall
The core processors are there and it's able to generate reports for that. It also complements any kind of firewall. For example, if an end user is using Palo Alto as a firewall, they'd need another layer of firewall like the S-Series that will protect internal servers. It's something that complements any firewall in the market.
Read full review
SC
SecOps program for us, as a smaller company, is amazing; they know what to look for
They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter. Even as part of the SecOps Program, that could be helpful; a quick analysis. They're analyzing our whole infrastructure and saying, "You have one VPC and that doesn't make a lot of sense, that should be multiple VPCs and here's why." The architecture of the servers in whatever cloud-hosting provider you're on could be helpful. Other than that, they should continue to expand on their notifications and on what's a vulnerability. They do a great job of that and we want them to continue to do that. It would be cool, since the agent is already deployed and they know about the server, they know the IP address, and they know what vulnerability is there, for them to test the vulnerability and see if they can actually exploit it. Or, once we patch it, they could double-check that it can't be. I don't know how hard that would be to build. Thinking on it off the top off my head, it could be a little challenging but it could also be highly interesting. It would also be great if we could test a couple of other features like hammering a server with 100 login attempts and see what happens. Real test scenarios could be really helpful. That is probably more something close to what they do with the SOC 2 audit or the report. But more visualization of that, being able to test things out on our infrastructure to make sure we can or can't hit this box could be interesting.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Setup is straightforward with the same reliability and scalability as the firewall series."
"The number-one feature is the monitoring of interactive sessions on our Linux machines. We run an immutable environment, so that nothing is allowed to be changed in production... We're constantly monitoring to make sure that no one is violating that. Threat Stack is what allows us to do that."
"The rules are really great. They give us more visibility and control over what's being triggered. There's a large set of rules that come out-of-the-box. We can customize them and we can create our own rules based on the traffic patterns that we see."
"With Threat Stack, we quickly identified some AWS accounts which had services that would potentially be exposed and were able to remediate them prior to release of products."
"We're using it on container to see when activity involving executables happens, and that's great."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"Every other security tool we've looked is good at containers, or at Kubernetes, is good at AWS, or at instance monitoring. But nobody is good at tying all of those things together, and that's really where Threat Stack shines."
"We like the ability of the host security module to monitor the processes running on our servers to help us monitor activity."
"There has been a measurable decrease in the meantime to remediation... because we have so many different tech verticals already collated in one place, our ability to respond is drastically different than it used to be."
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] pros
 

Cons

"Lack of tools to help educate end users"
"They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter."
"The solution’s ability to consume alerts and data in third-party tools (via APIs and export into S3 buckets) is moderate. They have some work to do in that area... The API does not mimic the features of the UI as far as reporting and pulling data out go. There's a big discrepancy there."
"The one thing that we know they're working on, but we don't have through the tool, is the application layer. As we move to a serverless environment, with AWS Fargate or direct Lambda, that's where Threat Stack does not have the capacity to provide feed. Those are areas that it's blind to now..."
"I would like further support of Windows endpoint agents or the introduction of support for Windows endpoint agents."
"The reports aren't very good. We've automated the report generation via the API and replaced almost all the reports that they generate for us using API calls instead."
"Some features do not work as expected."
"The API - which has grown quite a bit, so we're still learning it and I can't say whether it still needs improvement - was an area that had been needing it."
"The compliance and governance need improvement."
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I'm happy with the amount that we spend for the product that we get and the overall service that we get. It's not cheap, but I'm still happy with the spend."
"It came in cheaper than Trend Micro when we purchased it a few years ago."
"It is very expensive compared to some other products. The pricing is definitely high."
"We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided."
"It is a cost-effective choice versus other solutions on the market."
"Pricing seems to be in line with the market structure. It's fine."
"What we're paying now is somewhere around $15 to $20 per agent per month, if I recall correctly. The other cost we have is SecOps."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Real Estate/Law Firm
13%
Performing Arts
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 48% of the time
Darktrace vs Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Darktrace vs Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 30% of the time
Vectra AI vs Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Vectra AI vs Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 22% of the time
More Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 25% of the time
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 20% of the time
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 20% of the time
Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 19% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
June 2025
Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
June 2025
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reportDownload Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Hillstone S-Series NIPS
Threat Stack, CSP,
 

Overview

Hillstone Network-based IPS (NIPS) appliance operates in-line, and at wire speed, performing deep packet inspection, and assembling inspection of all network traffic. It also applies rules based on several methodologies, including protocol anomaly analysis and signature analysis to block threats. Hillstone NIPS can be deployed in the network to inspect traffic left undetected by perimeter solutions, and is an integral part of network security systems for its high-performance, no compromise, best-of-breed protection capability and broad and flexible deployment scenarios.

Hillstone Networks

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?
  • Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
  • Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
  • Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
  • Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
  • API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
  • SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.
What are the benefits and ROI features?
  • Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
  • Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
  • Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

F5
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense
Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Check Point Software Technologies, Fortinet and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.