Heroku vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Heroku and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Heroku is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. Heroku holds a 3.4% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Heroku users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Heroku

Read 29 Heroku reviews

2,066 Views
609 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

461 Views
29 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Heroku

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Heroku and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are competing cloud platform services focused on deployment and management of applications. Heroku is favored for its simplicity, while Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud stands out for its advanced features and scalability, attracting enterprises with robust security needs.

Features: Heroku is known for its quick application deployment, seamless integration with third-party services, and a variety of add-ons. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud excels in strong container orchestration using Kubernetes, integrated CI/CD pipelines, and extensive security measures.

Room for Improvement: Heroku could enhance scalability options, offer more customization capabilities, and address limitations on free plans. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud could simplify its learning curve, streamline setup processes, and improve cost-efficiency for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku is praised for its simple deployment model and effective support for basic issues. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud offers comprehensive documentation and support for advanced deployments, suitable for businesses requiring flexible, scalable environments.

Pricing and ROI: Heroku provides a cost-effective option appealing to smaller businesses, generating substantial ROI for fast-deploying applications. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud demands a higher investment but offers significant ROI through its scalability and extensive feature set, ideal for long-term growth and security.

To learn more, read our detailed Heroku vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Heroku vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Heroku is 3.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Cristian-Molina

Senior Developer at Go Coeupas

Has a quick development cycle and continuous integration

The initial setup is straightforward. Heroku integrates well. You only have to push the code, and it automatically deploys the new version. Whether you have permission depends on the application. Currently, I have one application that I deploy myself. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is stable."

"The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the auto maintenance of databases."

"It's easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"Valuable for us was the fast deployment. This means the time to market is improved without pain for developers."

More Heroku pros

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly."

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

"We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert."

"They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more."

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"Heroku should increase its slug size limits."

"Their support is good, but they can improve their response time."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

More Heroku cons

"Technical support could be a bit better."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"Its price is very good."

"The tool is free."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is a little high in China."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Heroku?

I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Heroku?

I don't like that the web server crashes every day, every 24 hours. The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly. The Docker features are not great. You cannot use any ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Heroku?

We use the solution for web applications and web APIs.

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 24% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Heroku

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Heroku

Compared 10% of the time

Google App Engine vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

Render vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 56% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 44% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Heroku

June 2025

Download Heroku product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

June 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Overview

Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.

Heroku

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM

Sample Customers

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Heroku vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Heroku vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Heroku vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Heroku vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.