HackerOne vs ImmuniWeb comparison

HackerOne and ImmuniWeb are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. HackerOne is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while ImmuniWeb is ranked #37. HackerOne holds a 5.0% mindshare in ASM, compared to ImmuniWeb’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of ImmuniWeb users who would recommend it.

HackerOne

Read 6 HackerOne reviews

3,613 Views
1,301 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ImmuniWeb

Read 7 ImmuniWeb reviews

1,277 Views
255 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HackerOne

ImmuniWeb

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

HackerOne and ImmuniWeb focus on cybersecurity but offer different strengths. While HackerOne offers strong support and competitive pricing, ImmuniWeb provides advanced features, suggesting a higher long-term value despite initial costs.

Features: HackerOne provides a platform for crowdsourced security testing, focusing on bug bounty programs and flexible vulnerability policies. Its easy integration with third-party tools and a large community of skilled hackers enhances vulnerability management. ImmuniWeb offers AI-driven tools for web and mobile application security with automated testing and continuous security monitoring showing feature richness.

Room for Improvement: HackerOne could expand its automated testing capabilities and focus more on continuous monitoring to match immunity's preeminent features. ImmuniWeb's customer service could be enhanced to provide the prompt support seen with HackerOne, and its pricing plans could become more transparent. Both products could benefit from simplified user interfaces for improved usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne provides user-friendly interfaces and active customer assistance, ensuring smooth, stress-free integration into workflows. ImmuniWeb ensures streamlined deployment with centralized management and comprehensive onboarding, though it could improve in customer support to level up with HackerOne's standards.

Pricing and ROI: HackerOne is noted for competitive pricing and a pay-per-performance model, minimizing upfront costs while offering positive ROI. ImmuniWeb demands higher initial investments but offers data indicating superior ROI due to its advanced security improvements. Despite ImmuniWeb's higher upfront cost, the long-term security benefits contribute to its value.

To learn more, read our detailed HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (19th), Vulnerability Management (27th), Bug Bounty Platforms (2nd), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), AI Observability (11th)

ImmuniWeb

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 5.0%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ImmuniWeb is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HackerOne	5.0%
ImmuniWeb	0.7%
Other	94.3%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

Ruphus Muita

Senior ICT Security Consultant at Applied Principles Limited

Has improved my motivation to submit bugs consistently through fast response and clear filtering

I think HackerOne can be improved by allowing new users to gain access to certain programs that are only open to known, renowned users. Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities. I am currently satisfied with the rewards, response time, and other aspects of the platform, so I don't have anything else to add about the necessary improvements. I give HackerOne a nine out of ten because if new hackers are given more opportunities, it could be a perfect 10 for me. However, the reason I gave a nine is that I don't have much to complain about; I specifically love the program and don't have many concerns.

Read full review

Vivek Ashvinbhai Pancholi

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Commendable Solution with Robust Vulnerability Detection Mechanism Suitable for Global Market

The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. The solution is highly stable. The solution is scalable. Editing Key Points for Review "Review about ImmuniWeb" What is our primary use case? We use the solution when we face challenges and urgent attention is needed for complex cases from our clients. To address this, we collaborate with the middleware, internal, and client teams to analyze and sort through intricate logs concerning our business cybersecurity program. How has it helped my organization? The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process. What is most valuable? ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. It also focuses on consumer satisfaction and operates in English-speaking markets, primarily required by the UAE, the United States, Canada, and Australia, among other developed countries. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this product for the past one and half years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. I rate it a nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? Support is generally excellent"

"The initial setup process is user-friendly."

"ImmuniWeb is stable."

"After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing."

"I like the fully automated continuous discovery run by ImmuniWeb in the background. We do not need to rerun the same tests or the same scanning against our resources. We need to supply our IP addresses, domain names, and significant resources with special domain names and URLs, and we need to do it only once. Then we always have an up-to-date picture. I also like the integration with our single sign-on system. We do not need to maintain a separate set of usernames or user accounts. We can plug this ImmuniWeb service into our authentication technology, enabling two-factor authentication. We have secure authentication right out of the box. The other important feature I like is the executive view. You can easily switch from a technical view to an executive view and have a helicopter view of the compliance status. We can see how much effort is required and our current status."

"The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

Cons

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"Its technical support could be better."

"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features."

"A great idea would be to make a mobile application for the ImmuniWeb portal so that all information would be available on the go and from a mobile phone as well. It would be much more convenient."

"The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions."

"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."

"ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests."

"The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

"It is pretty expensive."

"The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."

"There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."

"I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."

"The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."

"ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

My main use case for HackerOne is mostly for submitting bugs. I get into the programs listed there, find one that is suitable for me, do my penetration testing on the systems, try to bypass some co...

See all answers

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 43% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 15% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 12% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 7% of the time

Cobalt vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

OpenText Core Application Security vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 25% of the time

Acunetix vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 22% of the time

OWASP Zap vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 16% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 12% of the time

More ImmuniWeb Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

December 2025

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb

December 2025

Download ImmuniWeb product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

No data available

Overview

HackerOne leads in offensive security with a platform that expertly identifies and remedies security vulnerabilities using AI and a vast researcher community. Trusted by industry giants, it integrates bug bounties, vulnerability disclosure, and code security in software development.

The HackerOne Platform offers a comprehensive suite of services, combining advanced AI technology with the skills of a global security researcher community to address complex security challenges. It facilitates an understanding of vulnerabilities, promoting better remediation practices across software lifecycles. Notable clients include Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and U.S. Department of Defense. Recognized for innovation and workplace excellence, HackerOne continues to set standards in security solutions.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Skilled Hacker Community: Access a large pool of expert security researchers.
Third-Party Integrations: Seamless compatibility with various tools like payment systems and project management applications.
Bug Bounty Programs: Incentivized vulnerability discovery across industries.
Direct Communication: Facilitates dialogue for better understanding of vulnerabilities.
Safe Practice Environments: Supports learning for both beginners and seasoned professionals.

Why is HackerOne beneficial for your needs?

Speed of Delivery: Quickly identifies and resolves security issues.
Responsive Support: Reliable assistance enhances user experience.
Transparency in Communication: Clear reporting processes aid in issue resolution.
Income Opportunities: Bug bounties offer financial incentives.

HackerOne finds significant applications in various sectors with its focus on vulnerability assessment, testing, and responsible disclosure. Organizations utilize it for ethical hacking and efficient vulnerability coordination, making it essential in cybersecurity strategies. The platform's reliability is evident in its ability to identify and document security threats effectively.

HackerOne

ImmuniWeb is a global application security company operating in over 50 countries, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. Most of ImmuniWeb's customers come from regulated industries, such as banking, healthcare, and e-commerce.

ImmuniWeb® AI Platform leverages award-winning AI and Machine Learning technology for acceleration and intelligent automation of Attack Surface Management and Dark Web Monitoring. The data is later leveraged for threat-aware and risk-based Application Penetration Testing for web, mobile, and API security testing. ImmuniWeb is the only company that offers a contractual zero false-positives SLA with a money-back guarantee. ImmuniWeb’s AI technology is a recipient of numerous awards and recognitions, including Gartner Cool Vendor, IDC Innovator, and the winner of “SC Award Europe” in the “Best Usage of Machine Learning and AI” category.

ImmuniWeb® Community Edition runs over 100,000 daily tests, being one of the largest application security communities. ImmuniWeb SA is an ISO 27001 certified and CREST-accredited company.

https://www.immuniweb.com.

ImmuniWeb

Sample Customers

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb

December 2025

Free Report: HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HackerOne vs. ImmuniWeb report.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.