Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Compute Engine vs SAP Cloud Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
Compute Engine offers initial cost savings and performance boosts, but financial benefits and precise savings remain challenging to gauge.
Sentiment score
6.6
SAP Cloud Platform offers significant ROI, enhancing decision-making and efficiency, especially for large enterprises, despite varying return opinions.
Top management buy-in is crucial, and conducting an ROI analysis is essential before adoption to ensure the investment aligns with value.
Orders are managed online, integrated with S/4HANA, reducing chances of fraud or communication errors in processes like purchase orders and sales.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Google Compute Engine support receives mixed reviews; some praise responsiveness while others note inadequate assistance and delayed responses.
Sentiment score
6.5
SAP Cloud Platform's support is quick for critical issues, with varied experiences in response times and quality for others.
I rate the technical support as ten out of ten because there is often a need for continuous technical support.
The availability of knowledgeable support to the implementation partners and the customers could be better.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Google Compute Engine is scalable and versatile, suitable for varying workloads, with strong network and security features.
Sentiment score
7.4
SAP Cloud Platform is praised for scalability, with mostly positive reviews, ease of expansion, and minor challenges for some users.
On a scale of one to ten, I'd rate its scalability at nine and a half to ten.
SAP Cloud Platform is most suitable for various business needs, allowing easy expansion.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Google Compute Engine is highly reliable with a 99.99% SLA, frequently surpassing performance expectations and stability compared to competitors.
Sentiment score
7.9
SAP Cloud Platform is reliable with frequent updates; stability is praised but issues sometimes arise due to external factors.
If the databases are accurately managed, the solutions and processes are performed quickly and efficiently.
SAP Cloud Platform is pretty stable, although there are occasional rare glitches.
 

Room For Improvement

Google Compute Engine users seek UI enhancements, expanded options, improved security, synchronization, and better support and marketing focus.
SAP Cloud Platform struggles with cost, customization, integration, documentation, user interfaces, migration, third-party compatibility, and error analysis.
SAP Cloud Platform should improve on integrating third-party applications with S/4HANA.
Allowing more third-party applications to be integrated into the cloud platform would make it easier for customers to adopt SAP Cloud Platform.
 

Setup Cost

Google Compute Engine offers competitive, flexible pricing, often cheaper than Azure and AWS, with savings possible through resource optimization.
SAP Cloud Platform features higher costs but offers flexible pricing and valued ERP solutions with discounts and negotiated rates.
SAP is competitive compared to other enterprise solutions like Oracle, though not necessarily cheap.
The cost for SAP Cloud Platform is high as the server is expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Google Compute Engine offers customizable VMs, scalability, cost-effectiveness, security features, and diverse compute and storage options.
SAP Cloud Platform offers robust integration, real-time data handling, and scalable solutions with strong security for streamlined operations.
In GCP, there's a custom configuration feature unlike AWS and Azure.
The most proficient feature of SAP Cloud Platform is integration for data services linked with Fiori apps.
It converts CapEx into OPEX due to its SaaS model.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Compute Engine
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (10th)
SAP Cloud Platform
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (6th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Google Compute Engine is designed for Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
SAP Cloud Platform, on the other hand, focuses on PaaS Clouds, holds 7.9% mindshare, up 7.3% since last year.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

WahyuKurniawan - PeerSpot reviewer
Reasonably priced and offers high availability features
The synchronization between two tools, meaning if I have another server outside Google Cloud, as far as I know, I cannot mimic the server in Google Cloud to another server outside Google Cloud. I don't know if Google has the above-mentioned features or not, and if it does have them, then maybe Google can help us set things right and how to make a server mimic either of the servers outside Google. With the hot swap features or if Google Cloud itself is down, we can replace the services with another server. Right now, I have another server outside Google as a backup of a production server. There should be synchronization between servers inside Google and those outside it. The high availability features in Google are only available in Google Compute Engine in different regions. If I have another server outside Google, the high availability features in Google cannot synchronize with such a server.
PinakiGhosh - PeerSpot reviewer
The implementation cycle has been reduced significantly but has room for integration enhancements
Our existing customers who are on ECC are on-premises. They are migrating to SAP Cloud Platform, specifically on S4HANA.  One of our clients was on SAP ECC on-premises, and they are moving to the cloud on S4HANA on the public cloud system.  We are supporting about 15 customers, mostly small to…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Compute Engine?
Everything is simple and useful. The initial setup is not challenging.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Compute Engine?
Google resources are cheaper compared to AWS and Microsoft Azure. Among the three, Google is the cheapest option.
What needs improvement with Google Compute Engine?
Google has a lack of focus on their products. They have many products in various areas of the market, but they do not productize or appeal to the market effectively. They should concentrate on prod...
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...
What do you like most about SAP Cloud Platform?
The product improved our company's business operations since we got value out of it.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP HANA Cloud Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Allthecooks, BetterCloud, Bluecore, Cosentry, Evite, Ezakus, HTC, Infectious Media, iStreamPlanet, Mendelics, SageMathCloud, Sedex, Treeptik, Wibigoo, Wix, zulily, Zync
Siemens, Shell & Volkswagen, Still, EarlySense, Roche, National Football League, Heidelberg University Hospital, In Mind Computing, The Timken Company, OPAL, EnterpriseJungle, Groupe Danone, Accenture, T-Systems, Sailing Team Germany, Sloan Valve
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: June 2025.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.