Google Cloud VPN vs Ivanti Connect Secure comparison

"Google Cloud VPN offers a lot of flexibility to customize, supporting dual track IPv4 and IPv6, and v6-only configurations."

"The most valuable feature of the product is its compatibility with almost every network."

"The most valuable features of Google Cloud VPN are its speed, connectivity, and reliability."

"Any time we had an issue with connecting the OpenVPN to a user, we just to them on the group's VPN and connected our VPN."

"The most valuable features of Google Cloud VPN are its speed, connectivity, and reliability."

"Google Cloud VPN is a reliable and easy-to-use solution."

"What I like the most about Pulse Connect Secure is that it's user-friendly. It's easy to use. You just need to connect, and that's it."

"It's a very convenient and user-friendly application."

"The new UI that they are providing right now is very good."

"The flexibility in their management is great."

"The tool's most valuable feature is remote access."

"The most valuable feature of Pulse Connect Secure is its ease of use."

"The most valuable features of the solution are reliability and uptime."

"It is customer-friendly. It is quite easy for our users to connect. There is also the flexibility of the features."

"The logging needs improvement."

"The platform's pricing needs improvement. Additionally, cost-efficiency enhancements or service integrations could add further value."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The customer service and support from Google are not top-notch yet are available. I would rate them around 7.5 to eight out of ten."

"The customer service and support from Google are not top-notch yet are available."

"The price for Google solutions could be cheaper. In general, I would rate it a seven."

"At the moment, Pulse Connect Secure is a pretty good solution, and I don't see any issues with it. Currently, I'm not aware of a new or additional feature that's needed in Pulse Connect Secure, but it would be good if the team could look at how the speed of connection could be increased. Though it's quite seamless and I didn't face any problem with the speed, it would be better to improve the speed and keep going forward, especially as the industry's changing and people would love connections to be a lot faster."

"The stability could be better. There are sometimes bugs in the system."

"Connection-wise, Pulse Connect Secure could be faster, and this is its area for improvement."

"Pulse Connect Secure could improve by having better integration with NAC solutions, such as Cisco ClearPass integration with Pulse Connect Secure. Additionally, they need better integration with Microsoft Azure AD and Azure Authenticator."

"The solution can be improved by addressing the failure to connect on public 2-step networks."

"We need to know how many live active users there are and we can't. We even updated the server, however, we still can't see the proper level of live connections. Right now, it's showing as 300 users and my customer does not have that many users in his organization."

"Ivanti Connect Secure needs to have faster connections. It also needs to improve the stability."

"The solution must be more user-friendly."

"It is fairly priced."

"It's not super cheap, but it's also not unrealistically priced."

"The product pricing is high."

"The pricing for Pulse Connect Secure is not low and not high, so it's good. It's a six out of ten for me, price-wise."

"The cost of the product is high, but worth it because of the utility and great product support."

"The price of Pulse Connect Secure is expensive."

"The pricing is quite nominal. We pay on a yearly basis."

"A license is required for you to use Pulse Connect Secure, but I'm not aware of how much it costs."

"I rate the product price a six to seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"Pulse Connect Secure is relatively cost-effective."