We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and Odo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect."
"It is a stable solution."
"There is a lot of flexibility and a lot of control if you use this efficiently."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use."
"Since the solution works with Terraform, it makes Infrastructure as Code (IaC) easier."
"Scalability-wise, it is a great product."
"I like Google Cloud IAP because it is easy to use and stable."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"The solution is stable and without any issues at this moment."
"Odo helped us a lot to be able to efficiently, effectively, and robustly have our employees who will work from their homes in times of the pandemic."
"The advanced protection, centralized administration, and the ability to have experts hand in hand providing us with good best practice solutions and centralized management have been useful."
"We have access to great functionality while establishing a remote connection."
"The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use."
"The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and should have descriptive manuals on the page website."
"We have some challenges related to purging the data. We get a lot of data on a daily basis that has to be refreshed on the site, but we are seeing some challenges with that. They can also include some third-party integration. We have one Akamai dependency. If they can come up with some API to talk to Akamai, it would be good."
"It is an expensive solution, so I would like its price to be improved."
"The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
"Scalability is very limited."
"Until now, I have not found anything that I do not like about this service, however, security trends and vulnerabilities will always exist and there should always be new ways to protect the perimeters of our corporate infrastructure."
"We'd like this simplified to provide a prompt and efficient installation since, in many cases, the solution or the guides provided by the manufacturer are a bit complex."
"They should centralize the configuration interfaces into a single pane since sometimes a point is being configured, and you have to move to another point to finish the configuration."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 6th in ZTNA with 44 reviews while Odo is ranked 17th in ZTNA as a Service with 4 reviews. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4, while Odo is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odo writes "Easy to use and manage and straightforward to set up". Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo, whereas Odo is most compared with . See our Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs. Odo report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
