We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and Jamf Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product’s valuable feature is the ability to add a large number of users."
"I am impressed with the product's security."
"The solution is stable."
"UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS."
"I find the GCS Portal to be particularly valuable. It is more user-friendly and easier to navigate compared to other cloud providers, such as AWS. I particularly appreciate the user interface of GCS."
"It is easy to integrate, especially if I consider the fact that it gives me a single dashboard where I have all the applications or apps displayed."
"The solution is easy to install and use."
"It is a stable platform."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"Jamf Connect allows for easy and seamless joining of Mac devices to Azure AD, eliminating the need for third-party involvement or support engineer assistance."
"Jamf Connect is a pretty simple and straightforward tool overall."
"The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices."
"The tool supports different types of authentication. It also integrates seamlessly if you are using other Jamf products."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's a good and stable tool, so you should use it if you have a need."
"It's connection with Azure is the most valuable. It is easy to deploy and connect."
"The most valuable feature is the synchronization of passwords with a local password, which works well."
"The solution could be more reasonably priced. We find it to be a bit expensive right now."
"The tool's grouping option layout and cost are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"the documentation could be a bit better in terms of what is presented on the screen versus what actually happens."
"The storage capacity of the product is an area that can be improved if it is made possible to increase it whenever you want."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"I think that the solution needs to be made available in a local region of every country, especially in countries like Taiwan."
"It is an expensive solution, so I would like its price to be improved."
"We have some challenges related to purging the data. We get a lot of data on a daily basis that has to be refreshed on the site, but we are seeing some challenges with that. They can also include some third-party integration. We have one Akamai dependency. If they can come up with some API to talk to Akamai, it would be good."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
"The solution’s technical support is bad and should be improved."
"Overall, there is a lack of consistent experience sometimes with some of their features."
"When a Mac is joined to Azure, the generic Pro console in the MDM should accurately display the Mac as joined to Azure in the inventory section. Currently, it shows "no domain account found," which can be misleading."
"We've had some issues when users restart their devices because the device asks for credentials afterward. Jamf Connect asks for a username, password, and MFA."
"The logs are an area with a shortcoming."
"Jamf Connect is beginning to implement Multi-Factor Authentication for offline authentication, but the setup documentation is insufficient."
"The configuration could be faster."
"We have faced issues with the product's configuration. If we use the tool with other business manager solutions, then there is the issue of naming conventions. The tool needs to be careful with newer updates so that it doesn't break any of the existing configurations."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 6th in ZTNA with 44 reviews while Jamf Connect is ranked 8th in ZTNA as a Service with 10 reviews. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4, while Jamf Connect is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jamf Connect writes "Enhances user convenience by streamlining login processes". Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo, whereas Jamf Connect is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, VMware Workspace ONE, Netskope Private Access and Zimperium. See our Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs. Jamf Connect report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
