We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and Intercept X Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to install and use."
"I find the GCS Portal to be particularly valuable. It is more user-friendly and easier to navigate compared to other cloud providers, such as AWS. I particularly appreciate the user interface of GCS."
"If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"Offers artificial intelligence, security metrics and a lot of information gathered to make decisions."
"After that, the client switched to Sophos to get the protection they lacked. It either works or it doesn’t and Sophos works."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the GUI."
"The solution protects us."
"The product is user-friendly."
"I am impressed with the tool's common dashboard feature. The solution is also easy to deploy and manage. Reporting is also easy with the software."
"Ransomware protection is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"I find the security heartbeat feature with synchronized security very useful. It's a very nice feature that allows you to basically switch off an endpoint. When an endpoint has got a virus or something like that, or it's infected or compromised, you can isolate it from the network, but only if you've got an XG Firewall as well. It also provides ease of use. It is the only antivirus that can recognize 25 out of the 36 ransomware and virus techniques that have been often used in terms of the behavior base using heuristics. It's beautiful, utterly amazing. No other antivirus can do that."
"The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better."
"They should include case studies to learn about the use cases."
"The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in the tools and features available on the GCP. In particular, the managed databases and queues could be improved, and it would be beneficial to have more offerings in areas such as data science and data warehousing. Additionally, GCP could benefit from offering similar tools to those offered by its competitors, such as Amazon AWS's Redshift."
"The tool's grouping option layout and cost are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The support can be more efficient. Google has different layers of support, like layer one, layer two, and layer three, but normally, the response from layer one is not very useful."
"Despite using GCP for all the resources, potential clusters on GCP caused difficulties."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
"The main real-time scanning takes most of the processing power of my notebook."
"The price of this solution can be improved."
"The pricing could be a bit lower to match the normal retail pricing."
"This solution is not in the high ratings on many of the top review sites. This solution has to be near the top for me to continue using it."
"The security is good but the feature set is limited."
"The problem is that if you have a lot of different components going on, each managed under a different umbrella, then you're going to be spending a lot of time hopping back and forth between the different components to see, "Well, I got hit here. What did my firewall see? I got hit in the firewall, the firewall says it allowed that attack in, did it land on anything to compromise any of my endpoints?""
"In my opinion, there have been significant developments in the product. In my opinion, I don’t have any suggestions as of now, however I can suggest a cost deduction which will be beneficial for all the parties. It will also relieve our budget and benefit our team."
"The cloud management console could be a little more user-friendly."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 43 reviews while Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 8th in ZTNA with 101 reviews. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4, while Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "A standard offering with good threat analysis but reduces machine performance". Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo, whereas Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiClient. See our Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs. Intercept X Endpoint report.
See our list of best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.