Google Cloud Firestore vs MarkLogic comparison

Google and Progress Software are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Google is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Progress Software is ranked #19. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Firestore

Read 2 Google Cloud Firestore reviews

70 Views
45 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MarkLogic

Read 2 MarkLogic reviews

236 Views
146 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Firestore

MarkLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

MarkLogic and Google Cloud Firestore compete in the database management sector, with Firestore having the upper hand due to its scalability and developer-friendliness.

Features: MarkLogic provides advanced data integration capabilities, support for multi-model data, and strong security features suitable for comprehensive data management. Google Cloud Firestore supports real-time data synchronization, effortless scalability, and effective integration within Google's ecosystem, appealing to modern application development needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Firestore is easily deployable within the Google Cloud environment, offers rapid setup, and provides extensive documentation and support for developers. MarkLogic, while offering dedicated support and training, requires more specialized knowledge for setup and maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: MarkLogic's setup costs can be substantial, reflecting its enterprise-level offerings and customer support, providing significant ROI for data-centric applications. Google Cloud Firestore offers a flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model, resulting in increased cost efficiency and scalability for growing businesses with minimal overhead.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Firestore vs. MarkLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Firestore vs. MarkLogic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Firestore

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed NoSQL Databases (10th)

MarkLogic

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

19th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

AnthonyAbah

Assistant Director at NAFDAC

Real-time syncing boosts productivity with efficient data management

The most valuable features are Firestore's query capabilities and its real-time syncing functionality. The queries are efficient, apart from some limitations. Real-time syncing allows any changes at the backend to automatically appear at the frontend. This is highly useful as it eliminates the need to reload the browser to see the updates.

Read full review

Beverly R. Jamison

IT Solutions Architect / Computer Scientist at Practical Semantics

Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support

MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added. The solution has been good at providing the updates that were what we were hoping for. They frequently update the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I use the solution for maps, saving some locations, and chats."

"The most valuable features are Firestore's query capabilities and its real-time syncing functionality."

"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."

"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."

Cons

"I initially faced a problem creating groups in individual chats."

"Firestore needs improvements in its querying capabilities, particularly the ability to join tables and merge data from different tables before sending it to the front end."

"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."

"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"MarkLogic is a pricey option, but there are some advantages to its pricing structure. For medium-sized clients or departments within larger companies, it is possible to obtain a license for one or two nodes for less than a hundred thousand dollars. Additionally, if you only need to deploy a single node, you can do so for under fifty thousand dollars. This is in contrast to other high-quality software options that are only accessible to larger businesses, where the starting price can be upwards of two hundred thousand dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Firestore?

Firestore needs improvements in its querying capabilities, particularly the ability to join tables and merge data from different tables before sending it to the front end. The pricing model is also...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Firestore?

I use Google Cloud Firestore for user management and data storage, primarily for web applications. Firestore helps sync data between different users and stores documents efficiently.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud Firestore?

I highly recommend Google Cloud Firestore due to its cost-effectiveness and real-time syncing capabilities. However, it needs improvements in querying functionalities and a simplified pricing model.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

No data available

MongoDB vs MarkLogic

Compared 44% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MarkLogic

Compared 32% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs MarkLogic

Compared 25% of the time

More MarkLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

March 2025

Download Google Cloud Firestore product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

March 2025

Download MarkLogic product report

Overview

Google Cloud Firestore is a scalable, real-time NoSQL cloud database that provides document-oriented data storage and synchronizes data seamlessly across devices.

Designed for mobile, web, and server development, Firestore allows developers to store and sync data quickly. It supports real-time updates which enable your applications to reflect changes instantly. Firestore is based on a managed infrastructure, relieving developers from server-side maintenance and scalability concerns. It integrates with other Google Cloud services making it a convenient choice for modern app development.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Updates: Firestore automatically synchronizes data across all connected clients in real-time.
Scaling: Dynamically scales to accommodate growing data and user demands.
Offline Persistence: Stores data locally so that applications remain usable in offline mode.
Database Queries: Supports sophisticated queries to filter and retrieve data efficiently.
Security: Provides robust rules-based security for data control.

What benefits and ROI considerations should users review?

Improved Development Speed: Simplifies syncing and storing data, saving development time.
Cost-Effective: Pay-as-you-go pricing model ensures costs align with usage.
Efficiency: Reduced need for backend development enhances productivity.
Reliability: Rest assured with dependable infrastructure that ensures availability.

Firestore is widely used in industries like retail, where apps require real-time inventory tracking and customer insights. In health tech, it's utilized for patient data management, ensuring real-time updates across platforms while adhering to security protocols. Educational tech companies implement the database to provide an interactive learning experience with live collaboration features.

Google

MarkLogic is an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database that is designed to integrate, store, manage and search SON and XML documents and semantic data (RDF Triples).

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

ALM, American Psychological Association, American Society of Agronomy, Cond_ Nast, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JWG Group, Lagardre Active, RSuite CMS, Wiley

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Firestore vs. MarkLogic

April 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Firestore vs. MarkLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Firestore vs. MarkLogic and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Firestore vs. MarkLogic report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.