Google Cloud Billing vs Harness comparison

Read 7 Harness reviews

2,588 Views
311 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Billing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Google Cloud Billing and Harness compete in cloud cost management. Harness seems to have the upper hand with its advanced automation capabilities and personalized service approach.

Features: Google Cloud Billing offers streamlined cost optimization tools, detailed billing reports, and multi-cloud expense tracking. Harness provides continuous efficiency automation, predictive analytics, and real-time reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Billing offers straightforward deployment with extensive customer support, making integration easier. Harness provides rapid configuration with a focus on dedicated customer assistance for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Billing has lower initial costs, appealing to companies aiming for immediate spend reduction. Harness, despite higher initial expenses, offers significant ROI through enhanced process optimization and reduced ongoing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Billing vs. Harness Report (Updated: December 2025).

Google Cloud Billing vs. Harness

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Billing

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

30th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Harness

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (7th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th), Feature Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Billing is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Harness	1.9%
Google Cloud Billing	1.6%
Other	96.5%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

PradeepKumar3

Director Technology Solutions at Redintegro Consulting Solution LLP

Simple to set up with helpful for cost management and good reliability

The only issue I faced was a while ago. My card was debited, or rather it was showing as debited when in actuality, it did not debit my card. After six months, they came back with back billing. Somebody should have verified the billing and immediately informed us. So yeah, However, six months is too late to identify such fault sightings. When I want to analyze the information, it would be better, since Google knows what I have used, to only show those items for analysis purposes. Especially when I look at a previous month's billing or usage across services. It's better to show the services which are used, not everything.

Read full review

reviewer2787357

Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automated delivery has made production releases safer and has reduced deployment incidents

The first point for improvement is the steep learning curve, where concepts such as services, environment, pipelines, and templates take time to understand. New users often need training before becoming productive, resulting in slower initial onboarding compared to simpler CD tools. An improvement idea is better guided onboarding with more opinionated defaults and examples. The second improvement can be on UI complexity and navigation; the UI can feel cluttered with many options and finding past executions, logs, or specific settings sometimes takes extra clicks, leading to small but noticeable productivity loss. Simplified UI views for common workflows and improved search and filtering could help. I also see cost and licensing as potential areas for improvement, as pricing can feel high for small teams and advanced features are tied to higher tiers, which may limit adoption for startups or smaller organizations. Flexible pricing models and more essential features in lower tiers could address this issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use Google Cloud Billing to pay for or renew the license of our Google Workspace products."

"What I like most about this solution is that it's easy."

"It is a stable product."

"Production deployments are faster and more reliable, especially for Kubernetes and cloud-based services, with significant reduction in deployment-related incidents, faster recovery when issues occur, faster, more confident releases, increased deployment frequency with higher confidence, and better governance and compliance that improved visibility and coordination across Dev, QA, Ops, and SRE teams."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

"By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time and also reduced risks of failures or error rates by upwards of 70%."

"The features of Harness are valuable, supporting rolling deployments, basic deployments, and blue-green deployments with zero downtime."

"Everything in Harness is configured and runs smoothly."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

Cons

"Google Cloud Billing should have a more user-friendly interface."

"When I want to analyze the information, it would be better, since Google knows what I have used, to only show those items for analysis purposes."

"At times you will find that the computer engines are freezing or it's about to freeze without any notification or information and it's unable to diagnose where it is hung."

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

"The first point for improvement is the steep learning curve, where concepts such as services, environment, pipelines, and templates take time to understand."

"Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

"Infrastructure as code or pipeline as code is something that Harness severely lacks."

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

"When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment."

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are monthly and cost approximately $100.00."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

Harness UI can do a lot of good things. Harness's UI should not feel very complicated. At the current stage, it feels very commercialized and compared to other platforms such as Argo CD or Jenkins,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

Harness has been implemented in our organization for one of our clients for approximately 8 to 10 months. Harness is particularly utilized for our infrastructure provisioning pipelines and our RITM...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Cost Explorer vs Google Cloud Billing

Compared 52% of the time

Cloudability vs Google Cloud Billing

Compared 25% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Google Cloud Billing

Compared 23% of the time

More Google Cloud Billing Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 18% of the time

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 10% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 8% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 8% of the time

GitLab vs Harness

Compared 8% of the time

More Harness Competitors

Product Reports

Cloud Cost Management

Download Google Cloud Billing product report

Download Harness product report

Also Known As

No data available

Armory

Overview

Google Cloud's cost management tools provide the visibility, accountability, control, and intelligence you need so that you can scale your business in the cloud with confidence. Tailored to meet the needs of organizations of all sizes, these tools help reduce complexity and increase the predictability of your cloud costs.

Google

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

Google Cloud Billing vs. Harness