Google App Engine vs HPE Helion comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Google and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #25. Google holds a 2.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Google App Engine

Read 36 Google App Engine reviews

3,217 Views
2,863 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HPE Helion

Read 5 HPE Helion reviews

1,179 Views
1,073 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

HPE Helion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and HPE Helion compete in cloud service offerings. Google App Engine has an edge in pricing and support, offering a more user-friendly experience, while HPE Helion provides a more robust feature set for complex enterprise needs.

Features: Google App Engine features automatic scaling, integrated developer tools, and support for various programming languages. HPE Helion offers unified hybrid cloud capabilities, enhanced security features, and pre-packaged applications.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine could enhance its flexibility for alternative services, improve its free tier offerings, and refine its user interface. HPE Helion can improve by offering more streamlined documentation, reducing initial setup complexity, and providing more budget-friendly options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google App Engine simplifies deployment through seamless integration and extensive documentation. HPE Helion offers comprehensive deployment models with strong technical support, crucial for enterprise-grade requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine is budget-friendly with a pay-as-you-go model and no high upfront costs, appealing to startups and smaller businesses. HPE Helion requires a significant initial investment but delivers better ROI for organizations prioritizing long-term value and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. HPE Helion Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. HPE Helion

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Helion

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

25th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Helion is 1.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google App Engine	2.2%
HPE Helion	1.4%
Other	96.4%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Rajesh Kadyan

Senior Engineer at Brillio

Have managed resources seamlessly thanks to robust platform capabilities

The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages. For instance, it doesn't support languages C and C++, only basic support for Node.js, Java, and Ruby. It's not a comprehensive solution for all scenarios. Moreover, the security feature is based on IAM roles, but it should ideally be based on Active Directory (AD) roles. For IAM-based roles, we need to add the proper users and provide all security permissions manually. In an AD-based model, we would simply add users to a specific group, and all permissions would be inherited.

Read full review

it_user568056

CTO at Indra

It provides access to private and public clouds. I would like to be able to select the best private cloud.

I would like to be able to select the best private cloud to use in terms of service and cost. If I need to put an application on the cloud, I would like to know which provider to use. I would like to know the best option for this application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The zero infrastructure management is valuable, allowing me to focus on the code rather than the service."

"The solution allows you to create apps right on Google."

"Administering App Engine is simple; it has intuitive UIs and a very scalable app engine."

"What I appreciate most about Google App Engine is that the deployment is significantly easier compared to a conventional Linux platform."

"Zero maintenance cost for web servers"

"The most valuable features of Google App Engine include the ease of rolling back deployments when failures occur, the ability to track deployment times, and the feature to split traffic between different instances."

"This solution is very efficient and easy to use."

"I have found it useful in my work and life."

More Google App Engine pros

"Helion Being backed by a vendor (HPE) rather than vanilla openstack gives us a little more confidence that the product is now at a level of maturity where we are happy to start consuming open technologies."

"The most valuable feature is our access to private and public clouds."

"It's improved the delivery of services to our clients, and I believe my clients get new business and better performance."

"HPE Helion provides access to world-class personnel and skill sets, and their ability to perform repeatedly at a high standard provides a positive experience."

"We have many more services, including self-service, and we don't have to call IT and wait for weeks or months for service, which is the biggest benefit for our business."

Cons

"There needs to be more directions in terms of how to use the solution."

"Some features of runtime don't work well in App Engine."

"There are two versions of Google App Engine: flexible and standard versions. I think they can improve by having only one version."

"There is limited customization because the sandbox environment restricts it."

"The main challenge with Google App Engine is the lack of UI deployment options, requiring deployment through Cloud Shell."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The main drawback with Google App Engine's standard environment was its restrictions. We could not work with file systems, run shell scripts from the environment, or use WebSockets."

"Google Cloud support for Google App Engine is very poor, with unresponsive and unaware agents. It took them almost a month to inform me that SSH is not possible with private instances."

More Google App Engine cons

"We need improvements for more hybrid use. Right now, the system is very focused on pay-as-you-go cloud services, and our customers are looking for more a hybrid use."

"I would like to be able to select the best private cloud to use in terms of service and cost."

"If they could reduce the cost, that would be good as there is much competition, and many companies and organizations are looking to reduce costs."

"With a lot of the services we use, we need a single dashboard that could do more."

"Some improvements I think are needed are greater stability and more up to date packages."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google App Engine?

My primary use case for Google App Engine is within the finance industry, dealing with enterprise-scale businesses.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Compared 15% of the time

Heroku vs Google App Engine

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine

Compared 5% of the time

Cloud Foundry vs Google App Engine

Compared 5% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Amazon AWS vs HPE Helion

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs HPE Helion

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs HPE Helion

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Public Cloud vs HPE Helion

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE Helion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine

September 2026

Download Google App Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

September 2026

Download HPE Helion product report

Also Known As

GAE

HPE Helion Cloud, HP Helion

Overview

Google App Engine offers seamless platform integration, automatic scaling, and zero infrastructure maintenance, enhancing development efficiency. Its serverless architecture with robust security measures supports diverse programming needs and simplifies deployment, making it a top choice for modern applications.

Designed for effortless web application deployment and API management, Google App Engine integrates smoothly with Google Cloud services, offering automatic scaling without the burden of infrastructure upkeep. Developers enjoy a cost-effective serverless platform that optimizes performance and reduces operational workload. Despite its intuitive interface and real-time logging advantages, areas needing improvement include documentation and community engagement. Expansion on language support, technical backing, pricing strategies, error logging, and advanced deployment tools is essential. Scalability and control flexibility require attention to resolve performance and customization issues. Enhancing migration paths and security features would significantly boost user satisfaction and platform reliability.

What are Google App Engine's most important features?

Seamless Integration: Connects efficiently with Google Cloud services and supports diverse languages.
Automatic Scaling: Adjusts resources in response to traffic variations, optimizing performance.
Zero Maintenance: No server management, freeing developers to focus on code.
Real-Time Logging: Provides instant insights to improve debugging and monitoring.
Cost-Effective: Offers a budget-friendly, scalable serverless environment.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Effortless handling of backend service demands without manual intervention.
Security: Reliable protective measures safeguarding application data.
Integration: Simplified authentication with Google services, enhancing productivity.
Support: Assistance for cloud migration and SaaS applications in diverse industries.

Industries like finance and manufacturing utilize Google App Engine for cloud migration and scaling SaaS applications efficiently. Its ability to seamlessly integrate with services like Pub/Sub and Stackdriver supports complex projects, while cloud-native tools like Cloud Run and Kubernetes Engine facilitate microservice communication.

Google

HPE Helion is a cloud-based platform offering scalable cloud solutions designed to support enterprise IT environments. Tailored for businesses aiming to modernize their IT infrastructure, it provides robust tools for cloud management and deployment.

Enterprises leveraging HPE Helion enjoy a comprehensive, flexible cloud management system that adapts to their current workflows. This platform facilitates seamless integration with private and public clouds, ensuring compatibility with existing IT frameworks. Users benefit from increased operational efficiency and agility, empowering IT departments to rapidly deploy and manage cloud-native applications. HPE Helion's cloud services provide optimized resource allocation and advanced security features, addressing modern business challenges.

What are the key features of HPE Helion?

Multicloud Management: Enables users to manage workloads across different cloud environments.
OpenStack Technology: Offers an open-source framework that promotes scalability and control.
Data Security: Provides comprehensive security measures for data protection and compliance.
Agility and Flexibility: Allows rapid deployment of cloud-native applications with reduced downtime.

What benefits provide significant ROI?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces IT costs by optimizing resource allocation and reducing infrastructure overhead.
Scalability: Ensures easy scalability to accommodate growing business demands without substantial investment.
Improved Performance: Enhances application performance through efficient cloud resource management.
Enhanced Security: Offers robust security solutions, reducing risks of data breaches and compliance issues.

HPE Helion is widely adopted across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In healthcare, it helps streamline data management and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Retailers use it to manage customer data and enhance the consumer experience. Financial institutions benefit from its improved transaction processing capabilities, supporting real-time analytics and secure operations.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

ACA Fashion Software, myLoc, Mendix, Comline AG, Nava Solutions, 20th Century Fox, Zhejiang University, iService Global, Okinawa Cross Head, Creative Photo Cloud, Zuora, Ormuco, Ecad, MyCloud, Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS)

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. HPE Helion

September 2026

Free Report: Google App Engine vs. HPE Helion

Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. HPE Helion and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google App Engine vs. HPE Helion report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.