

webMethods.io and Globalscape EFT compete in the integration and file transfer market, respectively. webMethods.io appears to have the edge in integration capabilities, while Globalscape EFT excels in secure file transfer operations.
Features: webMethods.io offers seamless integration with various systems, providing a centralized repository for document schemas, advanced data mapping, and intuitive adapters. It simplifies XML handling and supports continuous integration. Globalscape EFT is designed for secure file transfers, featuring advanced encryption, auditing, and user-friendly management.
Room for Improvement: webMethods.io could benefit from enhanced documentation, improved API management, and greater support for large file handling. Globalscape EFT should focus on optimizing its centralized management platform and improving performance in high-volume environments. Enhanced automation features and sophisticated reporting tools are also recommended.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io provides a flexible deployment model for both on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, though support issues may require escalation. Globalscape EFT boasts straightforward deployment and commendable customer service, although it faces challenges in high-availability environments.
Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io is known for its high licensing costs, justified by its robust functionality, with a complex, transaction-based pricing model appealing to large enterprises. Globalscape EFT, however, provides competitive pricing and a predictable perpetual licensing model, delivering favorable value and measurable ROI through cost reductions and efficient operations.
It has custom reports which are inbuilt, showing things such as how many files are going through, what the file sizes are, and if any invalid logins have happened.
A quicker response would be appreciated.
An incident portal is available where we can raise tickets and based on priority, they reply.
While I sometimes find difficulties with GCP, it works fine and flawlessly on AWS, especially since we have a large customer base and vendors where we send numerous files daily.
If any webMethods.io product is installed on-premises and a company wants to scale its application, either vertical scaling or horizontal scaling is needed.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
Sometimes we encounter error logging issues or the system goes down, requiring us to connect with the cloud engineer.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
If I'm transferring large batches, it takes them in threads. Globalscape EFT uploads the files on a threading basis, such as 100 files at a time, and the rest of the files will be in a queue system.
In one instance, while working on sending files from one folder to different vendors with different loops for every condition, the upload activity went out of the loop, resulting in all files being sent to the same vendor.
Another enhancement would be in OCR; currently, there is a huge demand for OCR capabilities. It would be perfect if webMethods.io had a built-in component for OCR, as this would be tested and allow customers to use it better than a third-party OCR application.
When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
It operates as a pay-as-you-go model.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
It is flexible because you can modify many aspects in Globalscape EFT.
If we want to make a REST API, SOAP, REST, or any other type, all kinds of things are put in one box and we can make anything we want to.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| webMethods.io | 2.1% |
| Globalscape EFT | 4.1% |
| Other | 93.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
Globalscape EFT, a robust file transfer platform, offers ease of setup, strong security, and user-friendly automation features suitable for secure data exchange across Windows and Linux environments.
Globalscape EFT supports centralized management, strong security protocols, and simplified automation, making it an ideal choice for businesses requiring secure file transfers. It integrates seamlessly with Active Directory and provides advanced features like PGP encryption, API support, and compliance controls. Users appreciate its efficient setup process, graphical interface, and reliable customer service. However, there is a need for enhancements in cloud capabilities, faster file transfers, and a transition to a web-based admin. Challenges include folder monitoring, concurrent use issues, and complex upgrades in high-availability environments. Users seek improved alert systems and reporting capabilities.
What are the most important features?Industries rely on Globalscape EFT for secure file exchanges, SFTP storage, and file encryption, integrating it with diverse systems for custom automation. Common uses include internal/external file transfers, compliance reporting, and secure communications across regions. It's implemented in both on-prem and cloud settings, maintaining managed file transmissions for multiple sites.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.