GitHub vs Polyspace Code Prover comparison

GitHub and MathWorks are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while MathWorks is ranked #26 with an average rating of 6.3. GitHub holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to MathWorks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of MathWorks users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,134 Views
2,480 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Polyspace Code Prover

Read 7 Polyspace Code Prover reviews

2,457 Views
1,794 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

GitHub

Polyspace Code Prover

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Polyspace Code Prover compete in the software development tools category. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its robust community support and cost-effectiveness in collaboration and source code management.

Features: GitHub offers collaboration, source code management, and integration capabilities. It supports markdown, automation plugins, and CI/CD integrations, ideal for team collaboration. Its scalability, security, and community support are highly valuable. Polyspace Code Prover excels in identifying critical software issues such as overflow and division by zero. It integrates into automotive environments, providing high-level code verification for safety critical industries.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve in CI/CD integration, project management, and security features. The interface and documentation are challenging for new developers. GitHub could also expand scalability and language support. Polyspace Code Prover needs enhancements in speed and scalability with large systems. Setup complexity and integration with CI environments could be optimized.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's cloud-based nature offers flexibility with public and hybrid clouds, backed by community support reducing the need for technical assistance. Its environment deployment is user-friendly. Polyspace Code Prover is typically on-premises with reliable technical support but requires more technical attention compared to GitHub. Both have satisfactory support, with GitHub benefiting more from community assistance.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub's pricing is mostly free for public repositories, incurring costs for private and enterprise options, making it cost-effective with a good return on investment in development processes. Polyspace Code Prover is more expensive but offers significant ROI in safety-critical sectors due to its stringent code verification benefits. The higher licensing costs may deter some users, although the gains in necessary environments are noteworthy.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Polyspace Code Prover Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Polyspace Code Prover

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Polyspace Code Prover

Ranking in Application Security Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

2.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polyspace Code Prover is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.3%
Polyspace Code Prover	1.3%
Other	97.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

reviewer2760282

General Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has struggled with performance and integration but supports critical safety verification

Execution speed of the tests and generally the integration into AWS-driven CI work chains or workflows represent how it can be improved in my opinion. Performance issues plus license costs are two main driving factors. The CI environments that we use employ up to around 40,000 virtual CPUs per day in peak, running at the same time. We always have problems distributing licenses accordingly with other products. I can talk to the experts doing the integration, but as far as I know, I was involved with Polyspace Code Prover and we had a lot of difficulties integrating it into our Bazel-driven CI toolchain, plus integrating it on the AWS environments in Linux that we use. It was much more straightforward using Code Sonar there. The reason is the execution speed, integration with Azure and stuff, and pricing. The CI integration and maybe a better-suited license model for CI-driven execution are other areas I recommend improving. That's something we discussed with all of the software companies whose products we use, such as compilers. We have a lot of parallel builds, and each call to a license server is actually problematic in the long run.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."

"Applying GitHub Actions saves so much time for the team because it automates the developer's work to the server."

"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."

"The solution can scale."

"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."

"The most valuable feature is the fact that it's cloud-based, and we don't have to manage an on-premises server to use it."

"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

More GitHub pros

"The outputs are very reliable."

"Efficiency and speed are the advantages I see in Code Sonar over Polyspace Code Prover."

"Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

"The product detects memory corruptions."

"Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

"When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

Cons

"The sign in process is a bit difficult."

"Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"GitHub could improve in resolving conflicts when multiple developers modify the same line of code."

"I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature."

"Scalability is an area with a shortcoming, because of which it has room for improvement."

"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

More GitHub cons

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

"Because we had difficulties in efficiently integrating Polyspace Code Prover into our CI toolchain, these tests are mostly run manually and only occasionally."

"The tool has some stability issues."

"One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

"Automation could be a challenge."

"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"We use the paid version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

38%

Computer Software Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What do you like most about Polyspace Code Prover?

When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polyspace Code Prover?

We use the paid version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polyspace Code Prover?

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Coverity Static vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 23% of the time

SonarQube vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 17% of the time

Klocwork vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 12% of the time

CodeSonar vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 6% of the time

More Polyspace Code Prover Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover

January 2026

Download Polyspace Code Prover product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

MathWorks

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Polyspace Code Prover

February 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. Polyspace Code Prover

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Polyspace Code Prover and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Polyspace Code Prover report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.