GitHub Code Scanning vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

GitHub and Parasoft are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.3, while Parasoft is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 1.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to Parasoft’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 3 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

676 Views
585 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

929 Views
571 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and GitHub Code Scanning are rivals in software testing and security analysis. Parasoft SOAtest is strong in features and customer service, while GitHub Code Scanning is better for integration in continuous integration/continuous deployment environments.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides extensive API testing, service virtualization, and testing of complex systems. It is focused on effective and comprehensive test scenarios. GitHub Code Scanning integrates effortlessly with GitHub repositories, performing real-time analysis and security checks within the development process. It emphasizes streamlined integration into existing workflows.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance integration with popular development environments and simplify its interface for new users. Additional automation frameworks would expand its appeal. GitHub Code Scanning could expand its testing capabilities beyond security checks, improve real-time feedback accuracy, and offer more detailed analytical reports.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest deployment can be complex, often requiring specific infrastructure, but it is known for excellent personalized customer support. GitHub Code Scanning offers easy deployment through GitHub’s ecosystem, with community support but less personalized attention.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest has higher setup costs, offering substantial ROI for companies needing complex testing solutions. GitHub Code Scanning is often more affordable initially, suitable for teams focusing on continuous development integration at a lower cost. Pricing preferences depend on the scale of testing needs and budget flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (20th), API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"GitHub Code Spaces brings significant value with its simplicity and ease of use."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"One of the most valuable features I found in Parasoft SOAtest is its ability to extend the product."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"We have seen a return on investment."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may overlook details, such as outdated libraries, which could be highlighted for attention."

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may over...

See all answers

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 34% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 29% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 15% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 23% of the time

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

April 2025

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

No data available

SOAtest

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.