Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub Code Scanning vs Indusface WAS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
17th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Indusface WAS
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
66th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Indusface WAS is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open
You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.
Use Indusface WAS?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?
We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?
The organization pays for the license of GitHub Code Scanning, but specific price details are unknown.
What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?
When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when check...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Flipkart 2. Ola 3. Zomato 4. Paytm 5. Swiggy 6. MakeMyTrip 7. BookMyShow 8. Snapdeal 9. Myntra 10. BigBasket 11. Jabong 12. Nykaa 13. UrbanClap 14. Lenskart 15. Grofers 16. Pepperfry 17. PolicyBazaar 18. Practo 19. Cleartrip 20. ShopClues 21. FreeCharge 22. Quikr 23. RedBus 24. FreshMenu 25. Limeroad 26. Voonik 27. HealthKart 28. CarDekho 29. FirstCry 30. Yatra 31. Koovs 32. Tata Cliq
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2025.
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.