GitGuardian Platform vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform comparison

GitGuardian Platform vs. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th), DevSecOps (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)

Tenable One Exposure Manage...

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Yusuf_Hashmi

Chief Information Security Officer at Jubil

Good discovery and vulnerability features and is easy to use

I think it's a good product for risk-based or exposure-based vulnerability management. It gives me the ability to identify potential weaknesses in my environment quickly. Once those vulnerabilities get identified on the console, it is only a matter of performing those actions. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitGuardian has many features that fit our use cases. We have our internal policies on secret exposure, and our code is hosted on GitLab, so we need to prevent secrets from reaching GitLab because our customers worry that GitLab is exposed. One of the great features is the pre-receive hook. It prevents commits from being pushed to the repository by activating the hook on the remotes, which stops the developers from pushing to the remote. The secrets don't reach GitLab, and it isn't exposed."

"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."

"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."

"The secrets detection and alerting is the most important feature. We get alerted almost immediately after someone commits a secret. It has been very accurate, allowing us to jump on it right away, then figure out if we have something substantial that has been leaked or whether it is something that we don't have to worry about. This general main feature of the app is great."

"My impression of the GitGuardian Platform's capability to detect secrets in real time has been really amazing, because it lets us protect or block the pipelines in which we deploy new applications so we can acknowledge when a secret is hardcoded in a repository, or when we have already hardcoded secrets within templates in our repos."

"GitGuardian has pretty broad detection capabilities. It covers all of the types of secrets that we've been interested in... [Yet] The "detector" concept, which identifies particular categories or types of secrets, allows an organization to tweak and tailor the configuration for things that are specific to its environment. This is highly useful if you're particularly worried about a certain type of secret and it can help focus attention, as part of early remediation efforts."

"GitGuardian has helped to increase our security team's productivity. Now, we don't need to call the developers all the time and ask what they are working on. I feel the solution bridged the gap between our team and the developers, which is really great. I feel that we need that in our company, since some of the departments are just doing whatever and you don't know what they are doing. I think GitGuardian does a good job of bridging the gap. It saves us about 10 hours per week."

"GitGuardian public leak detection significantly enhances our organization's data security by continuously monitoring public repositories."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The feature of vulnerability management and discovery is what I use."

"I think it's a good product for risk-based or exposure-based vulnerability management."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"For me, the setup has been an easy process."

"The product gives us a lot of insight."

Cons

"We have been somewhat confused by the dashboard at times."

"An area for improvement is the front end for incidents. The user experience in this area could be much better."

"It could be easier. They have a CLI tool that engineers can run on their laptops, but getting engineers to install the tool is a manual process. I would like to see them have it integrated into one of those developer tools, e.g., VS Code or JetBrains, so developers don't have to think about it."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"It took us a while to get new patterns introduced into the pattern reporting process."

"The analytics in GitGuardian Platform have a significant opportunity to better reflect the value provided to security teams and demonstrate actual activity occurring."

"We'd like to request a new GitGuardian feature that automates user onboarding and access control for code repositories."

"There is room for improvement in its integration for bug-tracking. It should be more direct. They have invested a lot in user management, but they need to invest in integrations. That is a real lack."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."

"Tenable needs to provide a better way to manage private clouds."

"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."

"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address."

"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address. Sometimes they behave abruptly, requiring me to rework reinstalling the sensors on the endpoints."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.ep?

The setup cost is reasonable.

What needs improvement with Tenable.ep?

There is not much room for improvement. However, the sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address. Sometimes they behave abruptly, requiring me to rework reinstalling the sensors on t...

What is your primary use case for Tenable.ep?

I use this solution for vulnerability management for the infrastructure, one cloud security, CSPM, and application dynamic testing.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 14% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 12% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 10% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 27% of the time

Picus Security vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 18% of the time

XM Cyber vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Cymulate vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

AttackIQ vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

GitGuardian Platform

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

Download Tenable One Exposure Management Platform product report

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

Tenable.ep

Overview

GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.

GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.

What features define GitGuardian?

Internal Monitoring: Tracks confidential data like IDs and tokens.
Dev in the Loop: Rapid alerts for leaks.
Detection Capabilities: High accuracy with a low false-positive rate.
Integrations: Supports seamless integration with multiple platforms.
Customized Detectors: Offers tailored security solutions.
Multi-Vault Support: Facilitates efficient issue management.

What are the key benefits when evaluating GitGuardian?

Comprehensive Detection: Identifies AWS keys and other hardcoded secrets.
Efficient Remediation: Swiftly resolves issues.
Improved Security: Prevents accidental leaks of sensitive data.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps.

In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.

GitGuardian

You can now translate technical asset, vulnerability and threat data into clear business insights and actionable intelligence for security executives. Combine broad exposure coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps and identity platforms, with threat intelligence and data science from Tenable Research. Focus efforts to prevent likely attacks and accurately communicate cyber risk to support optimal business performance.

Tenable One is an exposure management platform that combines risk-based vulnerability management, web application security, cloud security and identity security.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Information Not Available

GitGuardian Platform vs. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform