GitGuardian Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) comparison

GitGuardian Platform vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th), DevSecOps (3rd)

Netskope Data Loss Preventi...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is 3.5%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

ToddMcAlister

Lead Application and Data Security Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Flexible, provides insights into the infrastructure, and monitors movement of files effectively

The product is flexible. It takes care of our cloud infrastructure. The tool meets our needs. The normal compliance policies work well. The behavior analysis features give us insight into what is going on in the network. The tool has been pretty effective in monitoring the files that are being moved. The network integration has been fine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There is quite a lot to like. Its user interface is fantastic, and being able to sort the incidents by whether they are valid or for a certain repository or a certain user has been very beneficial in helping investigate what has been found."

"The breadth of the solution detection capabilities is pretty good. They have good categories and a lot of different types of secrets... it gives us a great range when it comes to types of secrets, and that's good for us."

"GitGuardian has helped to increase our security team's productivity. Now, we don't need to call the developers all the time and ask what they are working on. I feel the solution bridged the gap between our team and the developers, which is really great. I feel that we need that in our company, since some of the departments are just doing whatever and you don't know what they are doing. I think GitGuardian does a good job of bridging the gap. It saves us about 10 hours per week."

"It actually creates an incident ticket for us. We can now go end-to-end after a secret has been identified, to track down who owns the repository and who is responsible for cleaning it up."

"The entire GitGuardian solution is valuable. The product is doing its job and showing us many things. We get many false positives, but the ability to automatically display potential leaks when developers commit is valuable. The dashboards show you recent and historical commits, and we have a full scan that shows historical leaked secrets."

"The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement."

"I like GitGuardian's instant response. When you have an incident, it's reported immediately. The interface gives you a great overview of your current leaked secrets."

"We have definitely seen a return on investment when it finds things that are real. We have caught a couple things before they made it to production, and had they made it to production, that would have been dangerous."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The Real-Time Analytics and Reporting capabilities of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) are good and up to the mark."

"I find Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) easier and more appealing than Zscaler."

"The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access."

"The product is flexible."

Cons

"One of our current challenges is that the GitGuardian platform identifies encrypted secrets and statements as sensitive information even though they're secured."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"It could be easier. They have a CLI tool that engineers can run on their laptops, but getting engineers to install the tool is a manual process. I would like to see them have it integrated into one of those developer tools, e.g., VS Code or JetBrains, so developers don't have to think about it."

"The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a quote took two or three weeks. We paid for it in December but have not settled that payment yet."

"We have been somewhat confused by the dashboard at times."

"For some repositories, there are a lot of incidents. For example, one repository says 255 occurrences, so I assume these are 255 alerts and nobody is doing anything about them. These could be false positives. However, I cannot assess it correctly, because I haven't been closing these false positives myself. From the dashboard, I can see that for some of the repositories, there have been a lot of closing of these occurrences, so I would assume there are a lot of false positives. A ballpark estimate would be 60% being false positives. One of the arguments from the developers against this tool is the number of false positives."

"GitGuardian encompasses many secrets that companies might have, but we are a Microsoft-only organization, so there are some limitations there in terms of their honey tokens. I'd like for it to not be limited to Amazon-based tokens. It would be nice to see a broader set of providers that you could pick from."

"There is room for improvement in its integration for bug-tracking. It should be more direct. They have invested a lot in user management, but they need to invest in integrations. That is a real lack."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"I have not seen any benefits from this real-time analysis at this time."

"The product should be compatible with multiple file formats."

"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The pricing is moderate."

"Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can be improved primarily because we were looking for any other provider due to the ZTNA feature that we were scoping from Netskope."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

"The pricing is reasonable. GitGuardian is one of the most recent security tools we've adopted. When it came time to renew it, there was no doubt about it. It is licensed per developer, so it scales nicely with the number of repos that we have. We can create new repositories and break up work. It isn't scaling based on the amount of data it's consuming."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

"You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is moderate."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Government

16%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

What do you like most about Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access.

What needs improvement with Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can be improved primarily because we were looking for any other provider due to the ZTNA feature that we were scoping from Netskope. The trouble in that area for...

What is your primary use case for Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

In Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), we use DLP and network proxies, not just Netskope. We are currently using it on endpoints itself, as we haven't indulged in ZTNA as of now, so it is for only...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 18% of the time

GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 16% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Cycode vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 20% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 15% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 12% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 10% of the time

Next DLP vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 9% of the time

More Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Product Reports

GitGuardian Platform

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) product report

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring

No data available

Overview

GitGuardian helps organizations detect and fix vulnerabilities in source code at every step of the software development lifecycle. With GitGuardian’s policy engine, security teams can monitor and enforce rules across their VCS, DevOps tools, and infrastructure-as-code configurations.

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by more than 500,000 developers and is the #1 app in the security category on the GitHub Marketplace. GitGuardian is also trusted by leading companies, including Instacart, Genesys, Orange, Iress, Beyond Identity, NOW: Pensions, and Stedi.

GitGuardian Platform includes automated secrets detection and remediation. By reducing the risks of secrets exposure across the SDLC, GitGuardian helps software-driven organizations strengthen their security posture and comply with frameworks and standards.

Its detection engine is trained against more than a billion public GitHub commits every year, and it covers 350+ types of secrets such as API keys, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, and more.

GitGuardian brings security and development teams together with automated remediation playbooks and collaboration features to resolve incidents fast and in full. By pulling developers closer to the remediation process, organizations can achieve higher incident closing rates and shorter fix times.

The platform integrates across the DevOps toolchain, including native support for continuously scanning VCS platforms like GitHub, Gitlab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket or CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, GitLab pipelines, and many more. It also integrates with ticketing and messaging systems like Splunk, PagerDuty, Jira and Slack to support teams with their incident remediation workflows. GitGuardian is offered as a SaaS platform but can also be hosted on-premise for organizations operating in highly regulated industries or with strict data privacy requirements.

GitGuardian

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) offers advanced protection against sensitive data loss with robust features tailored for enterprise security needs, providing seamless integration and efficiency in monitoring data across cloud platforms.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps organizations safeguard their sensitive information by providing comprehensive data visibility and control. It addresses key needs such as compliance and IT security with its contextual understanding of data movements. It delivers flexible policy creation, which enhances data protection across all digital touchpoints. Adaptive machine learning capabilities allow precise identification and prevention of data leaks, ensuring that enterprises can confidently protect their data in real-time. The tool is highly regarded for its integration capabilities, though some users seek improvements in analytics and reporting functionalities.

What are the most important features of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Advanced Threat Protection: Guards against unauthorized data exfiltration.
Granular Control: Offers precise policy enforcement based on content and context.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly embeds into cloud services enhancing data security.
Customizable Policies: Enables tailored approaches to data protection rules.
Machine Learning: Utilizes AI for improved identification of sensitive data.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Enhanced Compliance: Assists in adhering to data protection regulations.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces data breach-related expenses through proactive measures.
Risk Management: Identifies vulnerabilities and mitigates risks effectively.
Data Visibility: Provides clear insights into data flows and storage locations.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is deployed across industries like healthcare, finance, and technology. In healthcare, it ensures patient data protection, supporting HIPAA compliance. Finance organizations benefit from its rigorous security controls for safeguarding financial records. For technology companies, it secures intellectual property against unauthorized access and leakage.

Netskope

Sample Customers

Automox, 66degrees (ex Cloudbakers), Iress, Now:Pensions, Payfit, Orange, BouyguesTelecom, Seequent, Stedi, Talend, Snowflake...

Information Not Available

GitGuardian Platform vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)