GitGuardian Platform vs Invicti comparison

Read 29 Invicti reviews

2,499 Views
500 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and GitGuardian Platform both compete in the cybersecurity domain with their respective solutions. GitGuardian appears to have the upper hand due to its innovative features and machine learning capabilities for efficient repository scanning.

Features: Invicti offers comprehensive vulnerability detection, strong integration options, and effective security risk identification. GitGuardian Platform provides advanced machine learning capabilities, efficient repository scanning, and robust real-time monitoring with alert mechanisms.

Room for Improvement: Invicti should consider enhancing scanning speed, improving reporting tools, and integrating more seamlessly with existing tools. GitGuardian Platform can improve with advanced customization, better false positive management, and precision in operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive support, though there may be occasional delays. GitGuardian Platform offers flexible deployment models and excellent, proactive customer support, leading to smoother onboarding experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti is cost-effective with a competitive price and solid ROI in vulnerability management. GitGuardian Platform's upfront costs are higher, but the advanced capabilities it offers justify the investment with a recognized long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Invicti Report (Updated: June 2025).

GitGuardian Platform vs. Invicti

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (13th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (9th), Software Supply Chain Security (6th), DevSecOps (5th)

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (6th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Proactive scanning measures and realistic audit recommendations enhance development focus

Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment. This feature helps us focus on priorities and prioritize the development team's effort, integrating seamlessly with DevOps to facilitate proactive scans of environments. Invicti also provides audit recommendations that are quite realistic, making it easy to discuss plans with developers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically. This results in issues being resolved within minutes, saving significant effort from the security team in tracking down or communicating with developers."

"Some of our teams have hundreds of repositories, so filtering by team saves a lot of time and effort."

"The breadth of the solution detection capabilities is pretty good. They have good categories and a lot of different types of secrets... it gives us a great range when it comes to types of secrets, and that's good for us."

"GitGuardian has pretty broad detection capabilities. It covers all of the types of secrets that we've been interested in... [Yet] The "detector" concept, which identifies particular categories or types of secrets, allows an organization to tweak and tailor the configuration for things that are specific to its environment. This is highly useful if you're particularly worried about a certain type of secret and it can help focus attention, as part of early remediation efforts."

"The entire GitGuardian solution is valuable. The product is doing its job and showing us many things. We get many false positives, but the ability to automatically display potential leaks when developers commit is valuable. The dashboards show you recent and historical commits, and we have a full scan that shows historical leaked secrets."

"I like that GitGuardian automatically notifies the developer who committed the change. The security team doesn't need to act as the intermediary and tell the developer there is an alert. The alert goes directly to the developer."

"Presently, we find the pre-commit hooks more useful."

"We have definitely seen a return on investment when it finds things that are real. We have caught a couple things before they made it to production, and had they made it to production, that would have been dangerous."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"Netsparker provides a more interactive interface that is more appealing."

"It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms."

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"The analytics in GitGuardian Platform have a significant opportunity to better reflect the value provided to security teams and demonstrate actual activity occurring. While the self-healing capability and proactive developer actions are important features, the analytics do not provide information around this activity."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"One of our current challenges is that the GitGuardian platform identifies encrypted secrets and statements as sensitive information even though they're secured."

"Right now, we are waiting for improvement in the RBAC support for GitGuardian."

"There is room for improvement in its integration for bug-tracking. It should be more direct. They have invested a lot in user management, but they need to invest in integrations. That is a real lack."

"It could be easier. They have a CLI tool that engineers can run on their laptops, but getting engineers to install the tool is a manual process. I would like to see them have it integrated into one of those developer tools, e.g., VS Code or JetBrains, so developers don't have to think about it."

"Other solutions have a live chat feature that provides instant results. Waiting for an agent to reply to an email is less ideal than an instant conversation with a support employee. That's a complaint so minor I almost hesitate to mention it."

"We have encountered occasional difficulties with the Single Sign-On process."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"I think that it freezes without any specific reason at times. This needs to be looked into."

"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"The scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product."

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."

"The pricing is reasonable. GitGuardian is one of the most recent security tools we've adopted. When it came time to renew it, there was no doubt about it. It is licensed per developer, so it scales nicely with the number of repos that we have. We can create new repositories and break up work. It isn't scaling based on the amount of data it's consuming."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

"You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."

"It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Government

16%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

29%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

We'd love to see notification updates in Slack, as the system does not provide feedback on updates to incidents, which can be problematic when developers resolve issues. ie. if a developer commits ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

What needs improvement with Invicti?

Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerab...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 17% of the time

GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 15% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Cycode vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 19% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

GitGuardian Platform

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Download Invicti product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring

Netsparker

Overview

GitGuardian helps organizations detect and fix vulnerabilities in source code at every step of the software development lifecycle. With GitGuardian’s policy engine, security teams can monitor and enforce rules across their VCS, DevOps tools, and infrastructure-as-code configurations.

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by more than 500,000 developers and is the #1 app in the security category on the GitHub Marketplace. GitGuardian is also trusted by leading companies, including Instacart, Genesys, Orange, Iress, Beyond Identity, NOW: Pensions, and Stedi.

GitGuardian Platform includes automated secrets detection and remediation. By reducing the risks of secrets exposure across the SDLC, GitGuardian helps software-driven organizations strengthen their security posture and comply with frameworks and standards.

Its detection engine is trained against more than a billion public GitHub commits every year, and it covers 350+ types of secrets such as API keys, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, and more.

GitGuardian brings security and development teams together with automated remediation playbooks and collaboration features to resolve incidents fast and in full. By pulling developers closer to the remediation process, organizations can achieve higher incident closing rates and shorter fix times.

The platform integrates across the DevOps toolchain, including native support for continuously scanning VCS platforms like GitHub, Gitlab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket or CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, GitLab pipelines, and many more. It also integrates with ticketing and messaging systems like Splunk, PagerDuty, Jira and Slack to support teams with their incident remediation workflows. GitGuardian is offered as a SaaS platform but can also be hosted on-premise for organizations operating in highly regulated industries or with strict data privacy requirements.

GitGuardian

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Sample Customers

Automox, 66degrees (ex Cloudbakers), Iress, Now:Pensions, Payfit, Orange, BouyguesTelecom, Seequent, Stedi, Talend, Snowflake...

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

GitGuardian Platform vs. Invicti