We performed a comparison between Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Observer GigaStor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Gigamon, Cisco, Keysight Technologies and others in Network Packet Broker (NPB)."It offers straightforward integration."
"It has high stability."
"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."
"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."
"It is a good product. It provides network visibility, which is important. Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network. It is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."
"The solution is straightforward to set up."
"It's able to capture packets and, after a long time, you can come and use that information; to check, to analyze - everything you would want to do. So it's very good and helpful if you want to protect your data. It is stored in a certain place where you can access it every time you want to analyze it."
"This solution allows us to see exactly what is going on in the network and we can very quickly solve issues with users."
"I also have the ability to see an application's performance, to see what's going on, why a network is slow, why this program for this user is experiencing a delay or some network issue"
"It can help to write your rules, organize firewalls, your block, and also your protocols and IP address to come in or out of your network."
"The ability to capture packets. It is not only for monitoring. That is very important for a company that wants to keep an eye on the packets, the transactions, the flows..."
"They should increase the solution's cluster capacity."
"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."
"Its filtering feature needs improvement."
"The security should be improved."
"The graphical user interface could be improved."
"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."
"Graphics need improvement. Because a lot of the information there you have to input first in some case to have full potential. It could be more automated."
"Maybe the graphical user interface could be simplified to allow people to use it more easily. It's already good, but they can work more on it to make it even easier."
"I would like to have more than 4TB of storage available in the portable version of this solution."
More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is ranked 1st in Network Packet Broker (NPB) with 6 reviews while Observer GigaStor is ranked 8th in Network Packet Broker (NPB). Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is rated 8.6, while Observer GigaStor is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline writes "Stable solution with good technical support service". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Observer GigaStor writes "Provides long term capture and analysis capabilities". Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is most compared with Ixia Network Packet Brokers, Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker, Arista Data ANalyZer, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Ixia Hawkeye, whereas Observer GigaStor is most compared with Wireshark, Fortinet FortiSIEM, Kentik and Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker.
See our list of best Network Packet Broker (NPB) vendors.
We monitor all Network Packet Broker (NPB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.