Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Uplynk comparison

Gigamon and Uplynk are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Gigamon is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.5, while Uplynk is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Gigamon holds a 0.5% mindshare in WAF, compared to Uplynk’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gigamon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Uplynk and Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline compete in the data management sector, each offering unique strengths. Uplynk is more appealing for budget-conscious buyers due to its pricing and customer support excellence, whereas Gigamon stands out for its superior functionality, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Uplynk is known for streamlined data integration, real-time analytics, and an easy-to-use dashboard that aids in efficient content delivery. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline excels in advanced network visibility, traffic optimization, and packet filtering capabilities, which provide comprehensive insights into network performance.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could enhance its network visibility features, provide more in-depth monitoring solutions, and expand its integration capabilities. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline could benefit from simplifying its technical setup, improving user-friendliness, and offering more budget-friendly pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk offers a quicker deployment process with excellent customer service noted for rapid response times. In contrast, Gigamon requires more technical setup expertise, yet it provides extensive support documentation and training resources. Uplynk is ideal for teams seeking swift integration, whereas Gigamon suits organizations investing in complex deployment for enhanced insights.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk offers a cost-effective setup with quicker ROI due to lower upfront costs, making it ideal for small to medium-sized businesses. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, while initially more expensive, offers significant long-term ROI through improved network performance insights, appealing to larger enterprises focusing on comprehensive data observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Uplynk

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is 4.0%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall	4.0%
Uplynk	1.5%
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline	0.5%
Other	94.0%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Dean Barisic

CTO at PlayNirvana

Advanced security reporting has protected high-traffic betting platforms from constant attacks

I don't see room for improvement to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. One thing I don't know much about because we have a dedicated IT team for that, and I'm not involved with Cloudflare much anymore. But if I were to compare them to F5, I would like to see more features that F5 offers. F5 has an option to bring the whole infrastructure, the whole WAF and all their packages, Bot Management, and everything else on your infrastructure. You need to install certain services from their side, and then you can choose if you would like requests to hit your servers immediately or if requests need to be proxied through F5 backbone. That would be a nice addition because we have 90% of the traffic as legit traffic coming from whitelisted servers. If it comes from whitelisted servers, I don't need to go every request through the backbone; I could easily just IP whitelist everything. Then I could maybe have Bot Management on my infrastructure that drastically reduces the price of Cloudflare. I would like to see Push CDN more improved in the next release of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. And maybe something similar to Pushpin that Fastly has, which is an option where you can push messages that then can be scaled globally over the network. From our perspective, if we have a listener that listens for stock updates, I would just need to have one processor that pushes those updates to the Cloudflare API, and then Cloudflare would broadcast that message to all listeners. Cloudflare will check the order of the message, and if you, as a customer, are not connected or have some kind of network issue, when you reconnect, you will receive the latest state and missing updates.

Read full review

TuanNguyen13

Senior Relationship Banker at Joint stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of V

Experience boosts operational efficiency while performance sees room for improvement

I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working with Dynatrace Operator. I am also working with Algosec, Alluvio, CrowdStrike, Firemon, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, and other solutions. I think it's a good tool, and I am satisfied with it. We have not stored cloud workloads with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline yet; we are still on-premises. The technical support takes about one to two hours to respond, which is acceptable. I am satisfied with the scalability of the product. The interface is good.

Read full review

Joe Hernandez

Senior Software Engineer at OmniTier Inc

Improved mobile app development and user experience through optimization and security

The most valuable aspects include the optimization of application performance by optimizing API calls for a smoother user experience and faster load times. Furthermore, I restructured our code base to establish a more efficient development workflow. During my tenure, I integrated various security features for mobile applications, such as JWT tokens for secure authentication and data encryption using AES algorithms. I also focused on secure storage options, secure coding practices, and platform-specific security compliance, like Android's SafeNet and iOS Secure Enclave.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The impact of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's integration with existing web technologies on our site's performance and security measures is quite great, actually."

"Cloudflare WAF provides protection through rules and functionalities like Cloudflare's SDRAP."

"The product has improved our security posture by blocking bad actors."

"Someone with a basic understanding of networking and security will be able to implement the firewall's basic features within 15 minutes."

"I have not had any issues with this solution, and I would recommend it to others who are interested in using it."

"The security features are valuable. The particular feature we use is called OWASP."

"The setup process is very simple for me."

"For us, the key feature of Cloudflare is DDoS protection and IP hiding, especially since we are a crypto company."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pros

"The Pipeline's Comprehensive Insights into data flows have helped improve operational efficiency and security."

"We use Gigamon for network visibility."

"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."

"It has high stability."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the encryption feature. From a security perspective, the solution hasn't significantly strengthened our security posture. However, it has greatly improved performance by streamlining encryption processes and avoiding encryption at multiple layers. This has also simplified troubleshooting, as we can whitelist certain processes."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"It offers straightforward integration."

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline pros

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

Cons

"The learning curve was steep initially."

"The solution's learning curve can still be further reduced"

"The rate limiting functionality could be enhanced, as we find it somewhat limited."

"I have experienced some difficulties with Cloudflare's support as a customer based in India."

"If they add logs history within the Cloudflare offering, that would be a great benefit."

"The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available."

"Their documentation could be better. They don't have documentation that explains everything well. They have documentation for everything you're looking for, but they lack a single piece of documentation to tie everything together. As a new user or beginner, it took us a little bit of time to figure out how to put all these things in place."

"There could be an option to duplicate the cluster to maintain the consistency of rules."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall cons

"They should increase the solution's cluster capacity."

"Its filtering feature needs improvement."

"Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good."

"The security should be improved."

"The Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline should have a feature showing the traffic flow within its platform. Currently, customers have to use separate tools for monitoring, which is inconvenient. If it had its visibility feature, it would make monitoring easier and more complete without needing extra tools."

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."

"The graphical user interface could be improved."

"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline cons

"The pricing was initially very expensive."

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."

"It starts at $20 and can easily go up to $200 monthly"

"What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."

"It is not too pricey."

"The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."

"Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."

"The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."

"We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution as expensive, around an eight or nine out of ten. There are other competitive solutions available."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The price of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

I don't see room for improvement to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. One thing I don't know much about because we...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

We are using Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's advanced reporting and analytics tools with their Zero Trust, so e...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use S...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

I am working with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Firemon, and I have been working with it for a year.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. B...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal softwa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Web Application Firewall vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

Grafana vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

Niagara Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 3% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 3% of the time

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 10% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

June 2026

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

June 2026

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report

Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2026

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF

Gigamon, GigaSecure

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall integrates DDoS protection, load balancing, and firewall capabilities. Its ease of use, configurability, and robust security measures make it a versatile choice for protecting web applications.

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall provides a comprehensive defense against threats with advanced reporting and robust security measures. It includes DNS integration, rate limiting, and extensive rule sets, all within a SaaS model that allows API configurability. Users value its caching, scalability, and pricing, although enhancements are needed in rate-limiting and third-party integration. Improvements in customer support, especially in India, real-time controls, and user documentation are also desired. Users seek a more intuitive dashboard, better log management, and improved alert systems, along with multitenancy capabilities and enhanced reporting.

What are the key features of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

DDoS Protection: Shields applications from denial-of-service attacks
Load Balancing: Ensures efficient traffic distribution
DNS Integration: Enhances domain name system security
Rate Limiting: Controls traffic flow and reduces abuse
Extensive Rule Sets: Offers customizable security rules

What benefits and ROI can users find in reviews?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business needs
Pricing: Offers reasonable pricing structure
Caching: Improves application performance and speed
Configurable Security: Provides customizable defense settings
Efficient Management: Simplifies security and application control

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall finds application in industries like banking and retail by acting as a comprehensive security gateway, managing authentication and authorization while protecting web applications from malicious Layer 7 traffic. It also implements load balancing, CDN, and zero-trust policies, supported by advanced reporting, analytics tools, and threat scoring to meet specific industry needs.

Cloudflare

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline boosts network visibility and performance through features like NetFlow and deduplication, facilitating data flow insights and improved security. It supports traffic monitoring and management across various infrastructures.

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline enhances network management by offering features such as NetFlow, deduplication, header stripping, and packet filtering. These capabilities are instrumental in optimizing performance, offering users stability and improved encryption processes. Despite its robust hardware capabilities, it requires enhancements in security, filtering, and delivery time for hardware. Users note challenges with monitoring cloud networks and insufficient cluster capacity. There is also a call for improved interface design and internal traffic flow visualization.

What are the essential features of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

NetFlow: Provides comprehensive visibility into network traffic for informed decision-making.
Deduplication: Reduces unnecessary data replication, enhancing performance and efficiency.
Header Stripping: Streamlines data packets by removing unnecessary headers, improving speed.
Packet Filtering: Enables selective traffic analysis for targeted network insights.
Traffic Aggregation: Consolidates and transforms network data, aiding detailed packet analysis.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Enhanced Security: Improves data integrity and threat detection capabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines traffic monitoring and performance processes.
Improved Data Insights: Offers comprehensive data flow analysis for better decision-making.
Hardware Stability: Provides reliable performance with robust hardware support.
Encryption Optimization: Simplifies the encryption process for secure data handling.

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline finds application across industries for network visibility and management. It is used extensively for traffic monitoring, SSL inspection, mobile network oversight, and data center operations. Organizations leverage its capabilities to address network issues, enhance security, and streamline performance monitoring processes. Its ability to group traffic aids significantly in problem-solving and SSL detection.

Gigamon

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk

Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Uplynk

June 2026

Free Report: Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.