Functionize vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers comparison

Functionize and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Functionize is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0, while OpenText is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Functionize holds a 2.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Functionize users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Functionize

Read 1 Functionize review

1,030 Views
1,030 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 39 OpenText Functional Testing for Developers reviews

1,852 Views
1,556 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Functionize

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Functionize compete in software testing tools. Functionize stands out with advanced features, support, and superior ROI, despite OpenText's competitive pricing.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers script-based test automation suitable for complex testing environments. It supports extensive customization and provides traditional deployment. Functionize provides AI-driven testing capabilities, adaptability, and efficiency for dynamic testing needs. Its innovative features cover a wider range of testing scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText employs a traditional deployment model ideal for enterprises needing customization. Functionize offers a cloud-based approach reducing setup complexity and speeding up testing processes. Functionize is perceived as having more responsive customer service with robust support structures, providing flexibility and quick resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText delivers competitive pricing and setup costs, resulting in solid ROI for businesses needing traditional solutions. Functionize requires higher initial investment but provides superior ROI through AI features that lower long-term testing expenses, enhancing testing efficiency and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Functionize

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Functionize is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is 2.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2541093

QA Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides efficient test automation for web applications and has good technical support services

The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process. Vision AI enhances image recognition capabilities, improving the accuracy and efficiency of visual testing. The audit trail feature helps track changes and maintain compliance, which is particularly important in regulated industries. Smart fix automatically resolves issues, reducing manual intervention, while the self-healing feature ensures that test cases remain accurate and functional, even when system changes occur.

Read full review

Eitan Gold

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

User-friendly integration with support for Visual Studio enhances GUI testing capabilities

OpenText UFT Developer ( /products/opentext-uft-developer-reviews ) is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio. The support is excellent. It is easy to implement tests with OpenText UFT Developer. We primarily use it for GUI testing and testing web applications with another application. This is the main usage for us. We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework ( /products/framework-reviews ), and they work well together.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process."

"The most valuable features are the object repository."

"The solution is very scalable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

"The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local."

"It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE."

"The cost is the most important factor in this tool."

"It is quite stable, and it has got very user-friendly features, which are important in terms of maintaining our scripts from a long-term perspective. It is very stable for desktop-based, UI-based, and mobile applications. Object repositories and other features are also quite good."

"The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pros

Cons

"The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility."

"The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement."

"Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls. I faced challenges with schedulers and calendars."

"It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support."

"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."

"With Smart Bear products generally, you can have only one instance of the tool running on a machine."

"There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Functionize?

The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Functionize?

The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Functionize?

We use the product to transition customers from manual to automated testing, particularly for web applications. It involves reducing team sizes, accelerating testing strategies, and providing speci...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary. This limits the technology's ability to recognize every object.

See all answers

Comparisons

Testim vs Functionize

Compared 41% of the time

mabl vs Functionize

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Functionize

Compared 13% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Functionize

Compared 12% of the time

ACCELQ Automate vs Functionize

Compared 5% of the time

More Functionize Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 47% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 13% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

Wikidi Testomato vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2025

Download Functionize product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

July 2025

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers report

Download OpenText Functional Testing for Developers product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

Overview

Functionize delivers an autonomous testing platform that incorporates AI and machine learning technologies to automate the painstaking software testing process.

Functionize

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.

This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?

Complex Algorithm Handling: Manages complex scenarios with ease, including fuzzy logic.
Developer-friendly: Enables coding in C# and Java, integrating seamlessly with popular IDEs.
AI-based Object Recognition: Enhances test automation through advanced object identification.
Extensive Protocol Support: Supports a wide range of protocols for diverse testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Connects effortlessly with ALM and Jenkins, promoting continuous development.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Functional Testing?

Efficient Test Automation: Streamlines test processes, optimizing resource allocation and reducing effort.
Multi-platform Flexibility: Facilitates cross-platform testing, accommodating desktop, web, and banking applications.
Reduced IT Workload: Simplifies automation tasks, decreasing the strain on IT resources.
Enhanced DevOps Support: Integrates well with DevOps practices for continuous testing advancements.

Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Salesforce, Mastercard, Google, HP Enterprise, Cisco, Farmers Insurance, The General

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.