Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fujitsu Interstage vs IBM System Architect comparison

Fujitsu and IBM are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Fujitsu is ranked #35, while IBM is ranked #23. Fujitsu holds a 0.1% mindshare in BPD, compared to IBM’s 0.3% mindshare.
Fujitsu Interstage
  • 55 Views
  • 37 Comparison Views
IBM System Architect
Read 1 IBM System Architect review
  • 257 Views
  • 185 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Interstage and IBM System Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Microsoft, SAP and others in Business Process Design.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fujitsu Interstage
Ranking in Business Process Design
35th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (19th), Application Infrastructure (30th)
IBM System Architect
Ranking in Business Process Design
23rd
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Fujitsu Interstage is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM System Architect is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Design
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fujitsu Interstage?
Share your opinion
it_user542103 - PeerSpot reviewer
It has helped in supporting the development of an Enterprise Data Model
Data model development: This has built-in ways to create multiple, separate solution data models, including ways to link to an Enterprise Data Model (EDM). Other objects are encyclopedia-wide and need a different approach for managing solution-specific diagrams with an ability to query, e.g…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

Camunda vs Fujitsu Interstage Logo
Camunda vs Fujitsu Interstage
Compared 100% of the time
More Fujitsu Interstage Competitors
Visual Paradigm vs IBM System Architect Logo
Visual Paradigm vs IBM System Architect
Compared 100% of the time
More IBM System Architect Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2025
Fujitsu Interstage reportDownload Fujitsu Interstage product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2025
IBM System Architect reportDownload IBM System Architect product report
 

Also Known As

Interstage
System Architect
 

Overview

Enables companies to model, automate, manage and optimize their business processes.
Fujitsu
IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture tool, that you can use to visualize, analyze, and communicate all aspects of an enterprise architecture by applying industry-standard frameworks, notations, and methods. After you capture and understand an architecture, you can plan and implement its future improvements intelligently.
IBM
 

Sample Customers

Panasonic Corporation, iHeart Studios
Wuxi Lake Cloud, Nationwide, ETI, IDS Scheer
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Microsoft, SAP and others in Business Process Design. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.