Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Frontegg vs Microsoft Active Directory comparison

Frontegg and Microsoft are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #19, while Microsoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7. Frontegg holds a 1.8% mindshare in SSO, compared to Microsoft’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Frontegg
Read 6 Frontegg reviews
  • 678 Views
  • 424 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Active Directory
Read 43 Microsoft Active Directory reviews
  • 959 Views
  • 422 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Frontegg and Microsoft Active Directory are identity management solutions with different focuses. Based on user feedback, Frontegg is appreciated for its pricing and support, while Microsoft Active Directory is favored for its extensive features, suggesting it is worth the higher price.

Features: Frontegg is praised for its scalability, ease of integration, and suitability for agile environments. Microsoft Active Directory offers robust security, extensive administrative tools, and a broader feature set that justifies its complexity.

Room for Improvement: Frontegg users note the need for advanced customization options, enhanced reporting capabilities, and other features. Microsoft Active Directory users highlight issues with complicated setup, management interfaces, and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Frontegg is commended for swift deployment and responsive support, contributing to a smoother onboarding experience. Microsoft Active Directory, though powerful, has a steeper learning curve, and deployment can be time-consuming with less responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Frontegg is recognized for its competitive pricing and quicker ROI, appealing to smaller to mid-sized businesses. Microsoft Active Directory, despite higher setup costs, delivers long-term value in large scale, security-focused deployments with a pricing model justified by its comprehensive feature package.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Microsoft Active Directory Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Frontegg vs. Microsoft Active Directory
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
19th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (34th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (11th)
Microsoft Active Directory
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Active Directory Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Active Directory is 3.0%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395 - PeerSpot reviewer
Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support
Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.
Read full review
Roberta Politano - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good authentication features
The solution's group policy is a normal way to deploy configuration and helps deploy to a wider environment. The solution is deployed both on-premises and on the cloud. I would recommend the solution to other users based on their infrastructure. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."
"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."
"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."
"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."
"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."
"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."
"I can control all the devices in my domain by just changing the group policies in one place."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"It is an all-in-one solution for cybersecurity and is available at a very low price."
"It is a stable solution."
"Stability and performance are good. So far, we have not observed any major downtime or performance issues since we deployed it."
"Active Directory makes managing user policies easier, like when a user wants to share files. We also use it to create and manage our email accounts."
"The most valuable feature is the configured appliance system in Hypervisor."
"Active Directory plays a focal point in security management, encompassing aspects like credential management, lifecycle, dynamic provisioning, and the network infrastructure of customers."
More Microsoft Active Directory pros
 

Cons

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."
"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."
"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"
"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."
"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."
"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."
"The challenges everyone now has in mind is how to really migrate fully to the cloud. Many companies face both technical and cost-related challenges when moving from on-premise Active Directory to Microsoft Intra."
"Typically, it depends on the customer's situation. If the customer operates in smaller locations where most PCs are in a common location, we usually aim to consolidate the directory infrastructure for easier maintenance. However, for distributed setups spanning multiple countries, configuring multiple sites becomes necessary and more intricate to handle. Our objective is to minimize the number of sites, simplifying operations for IT administrators and reducing errors. Mistakes in Active Directory can be costly for organizations, as disruptions can occur rapidly. Moreover, when it comes to hybrid single sign-on across various applications, Microsoft hasn't put forth significant effort. Single sign-on has become a challenge for many customers who utilize diverse solutions beyond Microsoft products. While implementing single sign-on is relatively straightforward in the Azure cloud, it's considerably more complex when dealing with the local Active Directory. This presents a big challenge for many of our customers."
"I expect additional features like maximizing user flow, improving the branding of the UI, and enabling non-interactive login. Customizing the login page is limited to changing the background and logo, and adding terms and conditions during registration requires JavaScript."
"The scalability of the solution needs improvement."
"Sometimes, it can be overly complicated, and when you apply Group Policy in an Active Directory environment, sometimes those settings apply and sometimes they don't."
"I would like to see more integration with cloud-based applications. This would make it easier to manage users and devices across multiple platforms."
"The product's premium support services could be less expensive."
"Perhaps the synchronization could be simpler and more controllable."
More Microsoft Active Directory cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is not very expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."
"My company makes payments every quarter towards the licensing costs of the product."
"We purchase the license for the solution on a yearly basis."
"It's not overly expensive. It's considered a base function by Microsoft."
"The version of Microsoft Active Directory I was using was expensive because it was used for large companies."
"Active Directory is an expensive solution, primarily due to Microsoft's licensing model. This licensing approach includes paying for server licenses as well as for each computer that connects to it. However, when working with the Azure cloud, there is no cost for the server. This is profitable and one of the main reasons why Azure Cloud and other cloud-based solutions are being used more."
"The price of Microsoft Active Directory could improve. We pay annually for the solution."
More Microsoft Active Directory pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Educational Organization
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft Active Directory?
The solution is easy to install and has good reliability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Active Directory?
Technology is evolving. AI is offering solutions. However, short-term fixes are like band-aids.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Active Directory?
I utilize it in almost every scenario. I use the Hazer database and meet daily needs across every industry, every time.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg Logo
Auth0 vs Frontegg
Compared 63% of the time
WorkOS vs Frontegg Logo
WorkOS vs Frontegg
Compared 16% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg
Compared 11% of the time
Descope vs Frontegg Logo
Descope vs Frontegg
Compared 11% of the time
More Frontegg Competitors
ManageEngine ADManager Plus vs Microsoft Active Directory Logo
ManageEngine ADManager Plus vs Microsoft Active Directory
Compared 25% of the time
Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Active Directory
Compared 22% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Active Directory
Compared 16% of the time
CyberArk Identity vs Microsoft Active Directory Logo
CyberArk Identity vs Microsoft Active Directory
Compared 11% of the time
JumpCloud vs Microsoft Active Directory Logo
JumpCloud vs Microsoft Active Directory
Compared 7% of the time
More Microsoft Active Directory Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Single Sign-On (SSO)
May 2025
Frontegg reportDownload Frontegg product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Active Directory
June 2025
Microsoft Active Directory reportDownload Microsoft Active Directory product report
 

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Active Directory stores information about objects on the network and makes this information easy for administrators and users to find and use. Active Directory uses a structured data store as the basis for a logical, hierarchical organization of directory information.

This data store, also known as the directory, contains information about Active Directory objects. These objects typically include shared resources such as servers, volumes, printers, and the network user and computer accounts.

Security is integrated with Active Directory through logon authentication and access control to objects in the directory. With a single network logon, administrators can manage directory data and organization throughout their network, and authorized network users can access resources anywhere on the network. Policy-based administration eases the management of even the most complex network.

Microsoft
Buyer's Guide
Frontegg vs. Microsoft Active Directory
June 2025
Free Report: Frontegg vs. Microsoft Active Directory
Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Microsoft Active Directory and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Frontegg vs. Microsoft Active Directory report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.