Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FOSSA vs OverOps comparison

FOSSA and OverOps are both solutions in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category. FOSSA is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while OverOps is ranked #47. FOSSA holds a 3.3% mindshare in SCA, compared to OverOps’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of FOSSA users are willing to recommend the solution.
FOSSA
Read 15 FOSSA reviews
  • 1,757 Views
  • 806 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
OverOps
  • 49 Views
  • 2 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between FOSSA and OverOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Black Duck, Snyk, Veracode and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 855,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FOSSA
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OverOps
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
47th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of FOSSA is 3.3%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OverOps is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
 

Featured Reviews

Hanumanth Ramsetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Proactively mitigate deployment vulnerabilities with seamless dependency tracking
Before using FOSSA, we could only identify issues after deployment in the Cloud Run. Now, with FOSSA, we identify dependency issues or vulnerabilities during the CI phase itself. This proactive approach has eliminated the need to search the internet for solutions, as FOSSA provides updated recommendations automatically. This has made the process more efficient and mitigated risks before deployment.
Read full review
Use OverOps?
Share your opinion
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
855,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
27%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FOSSA?
The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free. You have to pay for the features you need, which I think is fair. If you want to get value for free...
See all answers
What needs improvement with FOSSA?
FOSSA does not show the exact line of code with vulnerabilities, which adds time to the process as we have to locate these manually. Some other tools like Check Point or SonarQube provide exact lin...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for FOSSA?
I have worked with FOSSA primarily to manage the dependencies in our projects. For example, if I take a Spring Boot application, FOSSA helps in identifying mismatches or unsupported dependencies th...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Black Duck vs FOSSA Logo
Black Duck vs FOSSA
Compared 40% of the time
Snyk vs FOSSA Logo
Snyk vs FOSSA
Compared 20% of the time
Mend.io vs FOSSA Logo
Mend.io vs FOSSA
Compared 13% of the time
JFrog Xray vs FOSSA Logo
JFrog Xray vs FOSSA
Compared 9% of the time
GitLab vs FOSSA Logo
GitLab vs FOSSA
Compared 5% of the time
More FOSSA Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
FOSSA
June 2025
FOSSA reportDownload FOSSA product report
Buyer's Guide
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
June 2025
OverOps reportDownload OverOps product report
 

Overview

Up to 90% of any piece of software is from open source, creating countless dependencies and areas of risk to manage. FOSSA is the most reliable automated policy engine for legal teams to maintain license compliance, security to fix vulnerabilities, and engineering to improve code quality across the entire software supply chain. As the only developer-native open source management platform, FOSSA fully integrates with your existing CI/CD pipeline to provide complete visibility and context earlier in the software development lifecycle. For the first time, teams can collaboratively shift left and audit, analyze, control, and remediate license issues and vulnerabilities right in their existing workflows.
FOSSA

OverOps captures code-level insight about application quality in real time to help DevOps teams deliver reliable software. Operating in any environment, OverOps employs both static and dynamic code analysis to collect unique data about every error and exception – both caught and uncaught – as well as performance slowdowns. This deep visibility into an application’s functional quality not only helps developers more effectively identify the true root cause of an issue, but also empowers ITOps to detect anomalies and improve overall reliability.

OverOps
 

Sample Customers

AppDyanmic, Uber, Twitter, Zendesk, Confluent
TripAdvisor, COMCAST, intuit, LOVELAND, FOX, COX AUTOMOTIVE, fuze, plantronics, zynga, nielsen, cotiviti, vivint
Buyer's Guide
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Black Duck, Snyk, Veracode and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
855,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.