Fortify Software Security Center and Ixia BreakingPoint are evaluated by tech buyers in the security and network testing categories. Ixia BreakingPoint has an upper hand with its superior features justifying its cost.
Features: Fortify Software Security Center provides comprehensive security analysis, detailed insights, and effective threat identification. Ixia BreakingPoint offers extensive protocol simulations, robust network test capabilities, and versatile application testing.
Room for Improvement: Fortify Software Security Center could improve integration capabilities, offer enhanced reporting features, and streamline user interface design. Ixia BreakingPoint could simplify the update process, enhance customization options, and improve scalability features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify Software Security Center is known for straightforward deployment with reliable support. Ixia BreakingPoint requires a complex setup but provides responsive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Fortify Software Security Center offers a competitive setup cost and satisfactory ROI. Ixia BreakingPoint has a higher setup cost, balanced by long-term benefits and performance returns.
By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
