Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector comparison

Forcepoint and Netwrix are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Forcepoint is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.0, while Netwrix is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Forcepoint holds a 0.3% mindshare in DLP, compared to Netwrix’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Read 3 Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reviews

120 Views
51 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Read 27 Netwrix Endpoint Protector reviews

1,732 Views
902 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Netwrix Endpoint Protector and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP compete in providing data loss prevention solutions. In terms of user satisfaction, Netwrix Endpoint Protector has the upper hand regarding pricing and support, while Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is seen as superior due to its advanced features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Netwrix Endpoint Protector excels in data visibility and control, focusing on preventing data leaks effectively and integrating seamlessly with various IT environments. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP offers dynamic risk-based adaptive protection, advanced threat detection, and response, giving it a technological edge. Both products deliver robust features, yet Forcepoint’s adaptive response stands out.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netwrix Endpoint Protector is recognized for its straightforward deployment and responsive support, facilitating integration into existing systems. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP offers comprehensive deployment options, though with a steeper learning curve. While Forcepoint provides deployment flexibility, Netwrix is notable for ease of setup and excellent customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Netwrix Endpoint Protector is cost-effective with a positive ROI, suitable for budget-conscious organizations. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP has a higher initial setup cost, justified by advanced capabilities. Its effectiveness in reducing data breaches may offer significant long-term savings, attracting those prioritizing security over initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is 2.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Nataraj KS

CISO at V Guard Industries Ltd

Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work

The onboarding process wasn't inherently complex, but it did take some time to open ports and configure the server. We're using three components of DLP: Endpoint DLP, email DLP, and web DLP. Web DLP isn't fully configured yet because we don't have a proxy. Email DLP took some additional coordination with a third party, and our Office 365 API, but those challenges were resolved. We have it installed and deployed on-premises. We have a partner who maintains it. It covers around 3,000 endpoints. It's deployed across our branches, factories, warehouses, and head office. It covers all endpoints in those locations. The deployment took some time due to our different locations.

Read full review

Mohammad Amir Hossain

Head of IT Infrastructure at Samsung

Block USBs and manage ports effectively across multiple OS platforms

There is an important feature that needs to be added. In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can uninstall it at any time, and we can only monitor that it is uninstalled. If there is a feature that can notify in the master dashboard that an agent has been uninstalled, it would be very beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is purely a DLP-based solution, which makes it the best option available."

"It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage."

"We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."

"One unique feature is drive encryption. We have portable devices, and they have a password vault. If you transfer any data to your device, you can use the password vault to protect it."

"Endpoint Protector's best features are its protection and user-friendliness."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution is the device control, which manages any portable device connected to the endpoint, and content-aware protection, which controls data in motion from the endpoint to outside, like when users try to upload data to a web browser or an instant messaging application."

"I like the data protection feature. Our users were working on a client's CRM application with a lot of client-related EIA information. We did not want the users to be able to send any of this data outside. I also like its ability to protect against data leaks via emails and social media. I like that you can deploy it quickly, and it requires no training."

"Its robust security audit and compliance functionalities prove especially beneficial for businesses in sectors like BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance) and Information Technology."

"There are effectively two areas of DLP to look at from a technical perspective. One is how it performs the pickup of information traversing the system and the other is how the policy engine, which analyzes the data, works. On the first aspect, CoSoSys is probably best of breed for macOS because they're reasonably well-integrated into the operating system. They're looking at the file system operations level, not at the execution level."

"All of the features are effective, but the highlight feature of the product was the data layer inspection. When we talk about a DLP product, data packet inspection is very important. Securing data at rest is easy, but securing data in transit is challenging. We used it comprehensively to secure end drives, data transfers, secure hard drives, and end-user machines. It proved monumental in our operations."

"The versatility regarding the exit point Endpoint Protector supports in making sure that important data doesn't leave our organization is vital for us. In the industry that we're in, data breaches are a significant concern. While our staff is contractually required to maintain confidentiality and they're all very aware that they shouldn't try and transfer company data of different classifications elsewhere to non-company devices, there's a risk."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

Cons

"The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application."

"From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis."

"The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved."

"It would be helpful if they offered discounted pricing for long-term contracts to serve customers who are interested in committing for periods of three years, five years, or longer."

"Endpoint Protector would be improved with more DLP templates."

"This product provides zero-day protection for macOS, although I'm currently dealing with an issue on the most recent rollout of the Endpoint client that doesn't seem to be fully functioning."

"In Linux a user can remove a getent anytime. There is no control there on the file structure in Linux. So if this solution could give us information on what users removed in the dashboard, it would help us."

"I would like to see an alert feature that when a system is started, it checks to make sure that the client has the most up-to-date policies."

"It would be helpful to implement filtering mechanisms so that we can sort and view the data based on software and vendor, providing more clarity and ease in analysis."

"CoSoSys Endpoint Protector's network-level DLP and integration with mail servers need improvement."

"We are currently facing an issue where it is blocking the Winman software, which is something that we don't want to happen because we use it in our accounts department to pay taxes."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license."

"The pricing is very competitive and is cheaper in comparison to that of other solutions. It makes it an easy decision to go with EPP for the data loss prevention infrastructure."

"The product has average pricing."

"The solution’s pricing is a normal industry standard and depends on customers and salespersons."

"Pricing is quite reasonable. For smaller organizations, it lets them get into the product domain, whereas a lot of vendors won't even talk to them. CoSoSys is just about at that sweet spot of being serious enough that you have to budget for it, but at the same time, affordable enough that the value is well worth it."

"I don't have any issue with the licensing and pricing. I would love for it to be cheaper, but at the same time I'm getting a lot from it."

"We found the pricing pretty attractive. However, volume-based pricing wasn't available."

"The price of Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys is more or less the same as other competing solutions."

"This solution was not too cheap or too expensive. But for the amount of features that they are offering, it was reasonable."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is very costly, especially in Sri Lanka, but the compliance ROI justifies the investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB ( /products/casb-reviews ) is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Endpoint Protector?

Its robust security audit and compliance functionalities prove especially beneficial for businesses in sectors like BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance) and Information Technology.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time. I rate the price as four, indicating it is a bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Safetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 17% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 13% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 11% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2025

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP report

Download Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP product report

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

May 2025

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

Overview

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP offers dynamic security measures tailored to data protection needs, ensuring sensitive information is safeguarded efficiently.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is designed to provide a balanced approach to data loss prevention by adapting security measures based on real-time risk assessment. This innovative system prioritizes protecting sensitive information while allowing for seamless workflow integration, making it a suitable choice for organizations looking to enhance their data protection strategies.

What are the key features of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

Dynamic Policy Enforcement: Automatically adjusts security policies in real-time based on risk analysis.
User Behavior Analysis: Monitors and analyzes user actions to identify potential threats.
Comprehensive Data Coverage: Offers protection for data across various environments and platforms.
Risk-Adaptive Responses: Provides threat mitigation options based on the assessed level of risk.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Reduced Data Breach Risks: By dynamically adjusting security measures, threats are mitigated proactively.
Operational Efficiency: Allows seamless integration of security with daily operations, minimizing disruptions.
Scalable Protection: Easily adapts to organizational growth and evolving security needs.
Cost-Effective Security: Optimizes resource allocation by focusing on high-risk areas.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is particularly effective in industries with stringent data protection requirements such as healthcare, finance, and government. It adapts its security posture to the specific risks faced in these sectors, addressing compliance mandates and safeguarding sensitive information efficiently.

Forcepoint

Content Aware Protection
Scanning data in motion
Monitor, control and block file transfers. Detailed control through both content and context inspection.

Device Control
USB & peripheral port control
Lockdown, monitor and manage devices. Granular control based on Vendor ID, Product ID, Serial Number and more.

Enforced Encryption
Automatic USB encryption
Encrypt, manage and secure USB storage devices by safeguarding data in transit. Password-based, easy to use and very efficient.

eDiscovery
Scanning data at rest
Discover, encrypt and delete sensitive data. Detailed content and context inspection through manual or automatic scans

Netwrix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

June 2025

Free Report: Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.