Forcepoint ONE vs Lookout comparison

Read 6 Lookout reviews

2,445 Views
391 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Forcepoint ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Lookout and Forcepoint ONE compete in the security solutions category. Forcepoint ONE appears to have an upper hand due to its features and functionality worth the higher price.

Features:Lookout provides intuitive security for mobile endpoints, valuable for users on the go. It includes real-time threat detection and device management. Forcepoint ONE delivers comprehensive threat protection across platforms, offers advanced analytics, and includes data loss prevention features, making it ideal for broader security needs.

Room for Improvement:Lookout users suggest enhancing integration capabilities, expanding platform coverage, and improving threat intelligence. Forcepoint ONE users indicate a need for better user-guided customizations, more intuitive interfaces, and streamlined administrative controls to better serve user preferences and needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Lookout is recognized for its straightforward deployment and responsive support, ensuring a smooth setup process. Forcepoint ONE's more complex setup is balanced by excellent customer service that effectively supports users through potential challenges, ensuring deployment hurdles are managed well.

Pricing and ROI:Lookout is seen as cost-effective, with good ROI due to lower upfront costs and efficient resource management. Forcepoint ONE, while more expensive, offers significant long-term benefits with its extensive feature set, justifying its higher price for users focused on comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint ONE vs. Lookout Report (Updated: July 2025).

Forcepoint ONE vs. Lookout

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint ONE

Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

21st

Ranking in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

12th

Ranking in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lookout

Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

26th

Ranking in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

15th

Ranking in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Data Protection (3rd), Threat Intelligence Platforms (23rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (44th), Mobile Threat Defense (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (19th), ZTNA (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) category, the mindshare of Forcepoint ONE is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lookout is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Q&A Highlights

Tim Thomasson

Information Security Specialist at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 01, 2017

Evaluating CASBs. Looking for community feedback on some vendors.

I have only done a peripheral review of CASB vendors in the past few months, but I do agree that the top ones to consider right now are Skyhigh Networks and Netskope. When looking at a CASB, be sure not only to consider if they offer all the right checkboxes, but take a look under the covers to see how they are handling those checkboxes. Sometimes, integration between the components is severely lacking or disjointed even when they have a high feature list.

Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable

Featured Reviews

Edwin Eze-Osiago

Regional Solutions Manager Sub Saharan Africa at Infodata Professional Services Limited

Bitglass integration with some IDP providers needs improvement. Currently, the solution is not compatible with Azure AD for third-party authentication. The fraud proxy in the SmartEdge agent is not compatible with Forcepoint DLP or a web hybrid agent. I would like the developers to consolidate multiple agents across systems for better integration.

Read full review

David Baynton

IT Manager at NHS Trust

Enhanced mobile security with visibility into app and website usage, but installation challenges remain

We use Lookout for mobile devices, such as phones It has reduced our risk around mobile devices. I like the security features and being able to see what apps and websites people are using. There is nothing we have come across that we've desired. We have been using Lookout for one year. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution’s AJAX-VM provides constant reverse proxy uptime. It has been very positive for our security operations. When people are trying to access the SaaS solution, it protects us from downloading any of that data and experiencing any type of attacks"

"The control of web access by category is very effective."

"The setup is relatively straightforward."

"The core CASB solution is the most valuable part. It allows us to put policies in place around which devices can log into our cloud applications. We have a policy that states that only company devices can access these cloud applications."

"The solution is very good when it comes to securing us against data leakage, because of the other proxy. It also has API scanning or data at rest. It inspects data in motion, which is the proxy, and then it has the data at rest, which is the API scanning. We can inspect for anything we want: file fingerprinting, PHI-sensitive data, PCI-sensitive data. It does not matter. We can usually find it and block it in transit and do our remediation with it. It could either be block, encrypt, or allow and watermark the file to follow it and see where it goes. It allows for those different scenarios."

"The platform's feature that has been most beneficial for our web security is its capability to replicate rules."

"Forcepoint ONE is okay for me, and I find it a very good solution. Its most valuable feature is monitoring. Its monitoring is very good, and it can communicate with a SIEM system. I also find the DLP feature of Forcepoint ONE good."

"The pricing is very good and cheaper than other solutions like Netskope and Forcepoint."

More Forcepoint ONE pros

"The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."

"The solution is stable."

"On the outside, the main differentiation is because Lookout ingest. They have ingested basically all of the apps for the last ten years and all the versions of all the apps, and we have that in a corporate database that allows us to do very large-scale machine learning and analysis on that data set. That's not something that any of the competitors really have the capability to do because they don't have access to the data set. A lot of the apps you can no longer get them because that version of the app is five or six years old, and it just doesn't exist anywhere anymore, except within our infrastructure. So, the ability to have that very rich dataset and learn from that dataset is a real differentiator."

"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."

"We have not had any issues with bugs or breakdowns."

Cons

"I wish they would advance more into the endpoint DLP solution. Currently they do not do anything around endpoint, they're still strictly cloud-based. The forward proxy is really the only thing they do. What I would like to see them do is to scan machines, workstations and servers, for information we might not want on those machines. That would be huge."

"Areas for improvement for the platform include addressing scalability and architecture concerns, especially for large deployments involving more than 500 or 1,000 users."

"We encounter challenges in determining whether certain features for blocking certain file types or preventing automatic downloads are functioning correctly."

"Integration into different multi-factor authentication tools. On their page, they tout Duo, but I don't use Duo. I use another vendor. Not that they don't interact, but it takes a little bit more doing. Any amount of efficiencies here would help."

"Initially, we had some challenges that Bitglass resolved quickly. The challenges were around communication. There didn't seem like there was the right level of communication within the Bitglass organization. Once we brought the issues up at a higher level, then they were resolved."

"Their new SASE (secure access service edge) product would have been the one thing I would have requested. Now that they have that platform, I'd like to see it as integrated and seamless as possible with the core product. That's what they're working towards and that's where we're seeing the advancements."

"In our environment, when an Active Directory password changes, we tend to have some latency issues with access. It takes about 15 minutes before that password is accessible through Bitglass after the change. That would be the major thing I see as a negative."

"One area for improvement in Forcepoint ONE is that you'll need more training to install the solution yourself. I practiced in a laboratory and I needed more technical information to do the installation."

More Forcepoint ONE cons

"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."

"The stability depends on the service from where you access it. Because sometimes, the place you are in, you have Gateway. You don't have Gateway. The gateway is overutilized. At the end, you need to go through their gateways. And this is the key point here. You have a tracking point. If it's not well orchestrated, and it scales up as you add more to the existing team, you will suffer"

"Lookout was moving into the SSE space. And so their work on SecureWeb Gateway and SD-WAN is still sort of evolving."

"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."

"The initial setup requires a little bit of experience with configuration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced compared to other vendors. I rate the pricing a two or three."

"When considering only the cost, the solution may appear to be costly; however, when evaluated in terms of commercial value, Bitglass is not expensive."

"The licensing cost for Forcepoint ONE would depend on the features, but the pricing is very competitive here in Brazil. The solution offers a good price, and I would rate it a three or a four in terms of pricing. I don't have information on whether there are additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees for Forcepoint ONE."

"We have our pricing by user. We do our pricing agreements annually. There are also additional costs for maintenance."

"Typically, the longer you price forward, the better off you're going to be. They have been very willing to work with us on pricing."

"There is training involved. If you're going to add more people to it, such as cross train more of your group, there's a cost. Other than that, that's it. We have paid exactly what the invoices have said. We signed a three-year contract and not gone above it."

"Lookout is definitely on the lower end when it comes to price point and that seems to be the only differentiator. The technology is in place in this space and it's really about who is coming in at the better price point now."

"The pricing is fair; it's comparable to our previous solution, and we carried out multiple POCs and POVs (proof of value). The product is worth the money we pay for it."

"In terms of feature performance versus cost, they're a good value."

"The licensing costs are good. Prisma has much more options and support for security, but it has a higher cost. For example, Lookout costs 2/3rd of Prisma's licensing price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Tim Thomasson

Information Security Specialist at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 1, 2017

Evaluating CASBs. Looking for community feedback on some vendors.

2 out of 10 answers

Stuart Berman

CTO at a tech company with 11-50 employees

Oct 3, 2017

We have used Skyhigh Networks for three years and very happy with it. Over the years they have added new capabilities. The original service provided an inventory of cloud applications that our internal people accessed as well as statistics and risk ratings and configuration guidance to block access. Over time they added more functions such as "protect" services for cloud applications like Microsoft O365 and Google Apps that provide protection for users regardless of whether they are on our network or anywhere on the Internet. We see the service as very effective and they have improved capabilities over the years such as improved reporting.

Read full answer

Earl Clark

President with 1-10 employees

Oct 3, 2017

No help on any of these, but thanks for the question. For a holistic approach (because anything less is insufficient), I've begun using Sophos appliances, services, and endpoint protection which all speak with each other and really fortify a network on all fronts. Services take up resources, so be sure to invest in an appliance powerful enough to serve all your endpoints effectively. Hope this helps.

Read full answer

See all 10 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint ONE?

The platform's feature that has been most beneficial for our web security is its capability to replicate rules.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint ONE?

The licensing and pricing were fine with no issues. I took over from somebody else, and it stayed as it was until we rebuilt and moved to the cloud.

What needs improvement with Forcepoint ONE?

There is room for improvement in making the reporting closer to real-time, ideally around five or ten minutes instead of half an hour. The interface could also be updated as it was quite dated.

What do you like most about Lookout?

The solution is stable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lookout?

The pricing is a little expensive. We are currently looking at comparisons with other solutions, including Umbrella.

What needs improvement with Lookout?

There is nothing we have come across that we've desired.

Netskope vs Forcepoint ONE

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Forcepoint ONE

Compared 14% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Forcepoint ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Forcepoint ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Forcepoint ONE

Compared 5% of the time

More Forcepoint ONE Competitors

Zimperium vs Lookout

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Lookout

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point Harmony Mobile vs Lookout

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Lookout

Compared 7% of the time

Pradeo Mobile Threat Defense vs Lookout

Compared 6% of the time

More Lookout Competitors

Product Reports

Forcepoint ONE

Download Forcepoint ONE product report

Download Lookout product report

Also Known As

Bitglass

CipherCloud

Overview

Forcepoint ONE is a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that provides organizations with a unified approach to protecting their critical data and assets. It offers a range of solutions that cover everything from network security and cloud security to data protection and insider threat prevention.

With Forcepoint ONE, organizations can gain complete visibility into their security posture, identify potential threats, and take proactive measures to mitigate risks.

One of the key features of Forcepoint ONE is its ability to provide real-time visibility into user behavior across all endpoints, networks, and cloud environments. This allows organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats, such as insider threats or malicious activity from external actors. Additionally, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced threat intelligence capabilities that leverage machine learning and AI to detect and respond to emerging threats. Another important aspect of Forcepoint ONE is its data protection capabilities.

The platform offers a range of solutions for protecting sensitive data, including data loss prevention (DLP), encryption, and secure web gateways. These solutions help organizations ensure that their critical data is protected both at rest and in transit, regardless of where it is stored or accessed.

Forcepoint ONE is a powerful cybersecurity platform that offers a comprehensive set of solutions for protecting organizations against a wide range of threats. With its advanced threat intelligence capabilities, real-time visibility into user behavior, and robust data protection features, Forcepoint ONE is an ideal choice for organizations looking to take a proactive approach to cybersecurity.

Forcepoint

Lookout is a well-established and powerful secure web gateway (SWG) solution backed by the company’s deep mobile security expertise and a large-scale mobile threat telemetry dataset of over 200 million devices. This broader threat intelligence helps Lookout strengthen its detection capabilities across the board. Lookout is designed to enable organizations to work remotely while maintaining a tight blanket of security over their confidential business data. It provides administrators with security that extends from their endpoints to the cloud service that they are using to run their organization’s network.

Users of Lookout are able to proactively detect threats and keep themselves secure from a field of threats that constantly evolves. IT teams can protect their organizations without having to rely on any other security solutions. This singular solution can run on multiple kinds of mobile devices. The privacy of individuals is preserved while keeping compliance rules intact. Additionally, users gain access to a number of tools that enable them to prevent security breaches from taking place.

Lookout Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Lookout include:

Ease of deployment. Lookout is a solution whose design makes it easy for users to deploy it. It provides users with simple, step-by-step instructions that remove the need for organizations to devote extensive amounts of time to make sure that it is properly set up. Anyone can quickly set up the solution without undergoing technical training.

Built-in support. Users of the Lookout application have access to built-in demos that can teach them how to use various solution features. Instead of spending time trying to figure out the application, users can watch the demo that is most relevant to them and see for themselves how that particular feature is used.

Easy-to-use user interface. Lookout’s user interface is laid out in an intuitive way that makes it easy for administrators to navigate. This interface is present in both the mobile and desktop versions of this solution.

Settings customization. Lookout has a built-in settings customization menu. This makes it possible for administrators to easily customize their settings so that they best conform to their needs.

Lookout Features

Activity monitoring and activity tracking. Lookout’s activity monitoring and activity tracking capabilities enable users to keep a close eye on the activities that are taking place in their networks. IT teams and administrators have the ability to watch their networks for any unusual activity. These features ensure that organizations can keep ahead of any potential threats. They provide the kinds of insights and warnings that make the jobs of those IT teams and administrators much easier and more streamlined.

Encryption. Organizations that employ Lookout can encrypt their networks and keep crucial business data from being read by unauthorized parties. This feature keeps the secrets organizations are trying to keep out of the wrong hands.

Anti-virus tools. Lookout provides users with tools to block threats from harming their networks. These tools can successfully block 99.6 percent of threats without raising false alarms.

Sample Customers

UNC-Charlotte

Information Not Available

Forcepoint ONE vs. Lookout