Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Foglight Evolve Cloud vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Foglight Evolve Cloud
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (68th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (109th)
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (18th), Cloud Storage (18th), Public Cloud Storage Services (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Infrastructure and Tools solutions, they serve different purposes. Foglight Evolve Cloud is designed for Cloud Management and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, down 0.1% compared to last year.
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Migration, holds 1.6% mindshare, down 2.9% since last year.
Cloud Management
Cloud Migration
 

Featured Reviews

Use Foglight Evolve Cloud?
Share your opinion
CC
Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time
NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
861,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
23%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

American Airlines, Bank of America, BARCLAYS, ebay, Ford, intel, MARS, MERCK, Microsoft, UBER, VISA
Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, VMware, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: June 2025.
861,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.