FME vs SAP Analytics Hub comparison

Safe Software and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5, while SAP is ranked #51 with an average rating of 6.0. Safe Software holds a 1.6% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of SAP users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

2,587 Views
2,018 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Analytics Hub

Read 8 SAP Analytics Hub reviews

785 Views
212 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

FME

SAP Analytics Hub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

FME and SAP Analytics Hub are competing products in the field of data integration and analytics. FME potentially has an advantage in pricing and customer support, whereas SAP Analytics Hub, with its additional features, may offer better overall value.

Features: FME is known for its advanced data integration capabilities, supporting a wide range of formats and real-time processing. It is appreciated for its ability to handle complex data transformations and offers substantial integration options with a user-friendly graphical interface. SAP Analytics Hub excels with comprehensive analytics and visualization tools, enabling organizations to unify analytics from various sources. It provides intuitive analytics and collaboration functionalities along with seamless integration with other SAP products, ensuring data consistency and real-time availability of information.

Room for Improvement: FME can further enhance automation and scalability, improve its interface design for ease of use, and expand its cloud integration capabilities. SAP Analytics Hub could benefit from more cost-effective solutions for smaller enterprises, enhanced customization features, and improved real-time data processing capabilities to compete with more agile platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME offers a flexible deployment model with notable support services, facilitating straightforward integrations into existing infrastructures. It is praised for its simplified integration processes. SAP Analytics Hub provides cloud-native deployment, focusing on ease of setup with strong enterprise support, recognized for its robust support in managing extensive analytics ecosystems.

Pricing and ROI: FME is known for competitive pricing with a good return on investment through its data transformation capabilities, making it appealing for its cost-effectiveness. SAP Analytics Hub, while potentially incurring higher initial setup costs, justifies its pricing through enhanced features and long-term analytical advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. SAP Analytics Hub Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. SAP Analytics Hub

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Analytics Hub

Ranking in Data Integration

51st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Analytics Hub is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FME	1.6%
SAP Analytics Hub	0.3%
Other	98.1%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Nitesh Agrawal

Director & Co-Owner at InfraBeat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Integration and security have improved, but search functionality and clarity of future direction need enhancement

The search function in SAP Analytics Hub is not effective. When speaking about integration with various analytic sources, for example, if I wanted to send the data from SAP BW or B4HANA to a data lake, we used to earlier use the Open Data Hub or Analytics Hub. Nowadays, we are using the Data Sphere integrators available with Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. The search capability could be better, and SAP needs to come out with a clear roadmap for the solution going ahead, as they have not yet provided that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"The platform's main benefit is its integration with SAP ERP data. It’s effective for data integration and integrity."

"This product provides good reports using a single pane of glass."

"As a partner, I can mention something positive about SAP Analytics Hub: its products are tightly integrated, so the business context of data is retained in the analytics solution, and that's the main advantage."

"For report scheduling, I always prefer SAP because it has the most powerful scheduling features, like sending reports to more than 1,000 customers per day. That option is not as good in Microsoft BI and in Tableau it only exists as an add-on option."

"What I like best about this solution is that it is built into the SAP line, making it easier to integrate with other SAP products."

"SAP Analytics Hub offers a user-friendly interface with effortless configuration, seamless updates, and real-time availability of information. It avoids the complexities associated with batch processing, providing a smooth and efficient experience."

"Data consistency is also a notable feature; the system takes care of data consistency, so you don't need to handle it manually."

Cons

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"Faster implementation of new functions for the new product is an area of improvement in SAP Analytics Hub."

"The interface can be simplified because it is not a user-friendly experience."

"The analytics part of SAP has not been that good up until now. They're still in the infant stage and development is still going on. SAP has some cloud analytics and they're trying to configure it in Lumira, but it's not that good at this point."

"Pricing and support are integrated into the system. However, the support process can be challenging, particularly when navigating the SAP support site, which lacks user-friendliness and ease of access."

"The platform could easily integrate with other ERP data solutions. Additionally, it should be faster compared to competitors in the cloud space."

"The technical support for Analytics Hub is limited and could be improved."

"The search capability could be better, and SAP needs to come out with a clear roadmap for the solution going ahead, as they have not yet provided that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The product is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"They are pursuing a highly assertive approach to target businesses of all sizes within the industry."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

34%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

I haven't had any input or requirements from any customers that are not currently covered, so I don't have any additional needs that were identified or raised to me. Regarding pricing, with the mod...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Analytics Hub?

The product is expensive. The cost starts from $1,000,000 per year. Moreover, there are additional costs involved for customization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Analytics Hub?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAP Analytics Hub?

When speaking about integration with various analytic sources, for example, if I wanted to send the data from SAP BW or B4HANA to a data lake, we used to earlier use the Open Data Hub or Analytics ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 24% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 10% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 10% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

More FME Competitors

SAP Analytics Cloud vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 42% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs SAP Analytics Hub

Compared 28% of the time

More SAP Analytics Hub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

October 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Analytics Hub

September 2025

Download SAP Analytics Hub product report

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

SAP Analytics Hub simplifies access to analytics scattered across multiple heterogeneous environments. The solution recommends the best analytics to fit personalized needs and grants users with actionable insights without compromising agility.

SAP

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

STIB-MIVB

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. SAP Analytics Hub

September 2025

Free Report: FME vs. SAP Analytics Hub

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. SAP Analytics Hub and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. SAP Analytics Hub report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.