FME vs Informatica PowerExchange comparison

Safe Software and Informatica are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5, while Informatica is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. Safe Software holds a 1.6% mindshare in DI, compared to Informatica’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Informatica users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

2,587 Views
2,018 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Informatica PowerExchange

Read 23 Informatica PowerExchange reviews

1,495 Views
1,360 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

FME

Informatica PowerExchange

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Informatica PowerExchange and FME are competing in the data integration category. FME has an edge with its spatial data transformation capabilities, making it suitable for industries that rely on GIS data.

Features:Informatica PowerExchange is noted for its robust data integration capabilities, compatibility with a wide range of databases, and scalability suitable for complex IT infrastructures. It offers native real-time scanning abilities and powerful change data capture features. FME is recognized for its simplicity in data conversion across multiple formats, its intuitive graphical user interface, and its exceptional ability to handle and transform spatial data, making it ideal for organizations needing extensive GIS data processing.

Room for Improvement:Informatica PowerExchange can enhance real-time capabilities further beyond batch processing and simplify integration with legacy systems. It could also benefit from more streamlined installation processes. FME could improve its handling of non-spatial data formats and offer more comprehensive enterprise-level support for larger organizations. Enhancements in API connectivity would broaden its capabilities for more integrated solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Informatica PowerExchange provides a straightforward deployment process with extensive enterprise support, which is beneficial for large-scale implementations. Its technical support is reliably available. On the other hand, FME offers a user-friendly installation process backed by comprehensive documentation and community support. Users often find FME's setup to be more intuitive, especially for smaller projects requiring rapid deployment.

Pricing and ROI:Informatica PowerExchange usually involves higher initial setup costs, suitable for large-scale enterprise integrations, but provides a significant ROI due to its extensive service offerings. FME is more cost-effective upfront, especially for organizations focusing on spatial data transformation, delivering faster ROI in scenarios prioritizing GIS data handling. Both products deliver good value for money, but FME is noted for its quicker returns when spatial data is key.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. Informatica PowerExchange Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Informatica PowerExchange

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Informatica PowerExchange

Ranking in Data Integration

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Informatica PowerExchange is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Informatica PowerExchange	1.2%
FME	1.6%
Other	97.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Mohammad Faizan Ahmad

Sr. Technical Engineer at Investcorp Bank BSC

Helpful in handling areas like complex data sources and data processing but needs improved support services

The major challenge with the tool stems from the fact that if you are implementing it in the cloud, then it has to be within the framework. Another challenge is the large volume of data. Informatica PowerExchange is a product through which we enable connectivity, so it is not an application product or a stand-alone tool, but Informatica's core systems or IICS uses it to connect to multiple systems. The major challenge associated with the tool is on the infrastructure side. The tool's features could be something faster with more connectors. A number of connectors can help connect to a wide variety of applications. The tool should focus on reducing the resilient time, like, if any network disconnectivity happens, then auto-reconnection and the retry method should be more robust so that manual intervention is not required. We communicate with the tool's support team as we need to raise our issues with them. I have already worked with Informatica and have a total experience of around eight to nine years; the one problem with the tool is its support team since they take a lot of time to address a particular issue. If one time you schedule a call and explain the situation to them about the issue, the support team will raise tickets and take notes. They will ask you to share the logs or screenshots of the errors, and you will get no resolution. The support team will randomly give you some documents and expect you to go through them, and if you get back to them with questions, a new person will be allocated, and you will have to start explaining everything again. I would not say it is a pleasant experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"The transformation work called for Informatica PowerExchange. It was easy to work with this and very stable."

"From the product feature or product capability perspective, the aspects around integration, transformation, and standardization are valuable. It's fairly easy to use. It has a GUI-based interface."

"Overall, it's a good tool. It's currently number one on the market. It pretty much has all the necessary capabilities to pull the incremental data from the source system, technically speaking."

"The user interface and user experience are perfectly all right."

"The most valuable feature is connectivity to data sources."

"The main benefit of PowerExchange is its native real-time capabilities. Competing tools are counting on third-party packages or Oracle to offer real-time capabilities. However, Informatica has a native ability to scan the data on the file system level and capture the changes almost instantly when I push it to the consumers. The solution has a powerful built-in replication engine."

"The product’s flexibility is valuable."

"Provides a significant amount of control over the landscape and overall implementation."

More Informatica PowerExchange pros

Cons

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"The major shortcoming of PowerExchange is high availability and failover. None of the versions we've used to date have had the out-of-the-box ability to enable failover and high-availability requirements. This is a significant challenge and risk."

"They should make it quick and easy for use of citizen data integration or for people or integrators developing at the customer side. They could be development teams within the business team. For them, the product owners can consider making it a little bit more seamless and a little bit more democratized."

"I would like to have easier integration with cloud platforms."

"Apache Spark has a machine learning algorithm, an area where Informatica PowerExchange lacks."

"V10.2 is very stable, but we are still struggling to make V10.5 stable. We found services that were down, and PowerExchange stopped working."

"The one place where it could be improved is definitely pricing. That's a very big problem. It depends product to product, but pricing is an issue."

"I would like the stability to improve."

"The product's high costs can be an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Informatica PowerExchange cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"The product is not very expensive."

"There are licensing and connector costs. Basically, Informatica is pay-as-you-use."

"The cost of PowerExchange is reasonable. It does not rely on complicated formulas or unrealistic equations. The pricing model is straightforward. There is one component, and real-time integration is included. Some other solutions require purchasing additional modules or third-party plugins for this capability."

"Many users don't prefer to use the product, considering the high costs attached to the licensing part of the solution."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing cost of the product. It is an expensive product."

"An annual package license fee is required."

"It's expensive. In fact, nobody would buy any product of Informatica if the price was the only consideration. It costs money, and it doesn't come cheap, but it provides value for money in many ways."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

34%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Government

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

I haven't had any input or requirements from any customers that are not currently covered, so I don't have any additional needs that were identified or raised to me. Regarding pricing, with the mod...

See all answers

What do you like most about Informatica PowerExchange?

The product’s flexibility is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica PowerExchange?

Informatica PowerExchange is considered cost-efficient due to reduced number of APIs needed, enabling re-utilization of existing channels, cutting down on development and training costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Informatica PowerExchange?

It would be helpful to have more metadata provided, which is useful for engaging more users in data exchange. The addition of data quality dashboards or measures would also help in profiling data t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 24% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 10% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 10% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

More FME Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 63% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 9% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 5% of the time

More Informatica PowerExchange Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

October 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

Informatica PowerExchange

September 2025

Download Informatica PowerExchange product report

Also Known As

No data available

PowerExchange, Connectors

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

Informatica PowerExchange Connectors provides high performance, out-of-the-box connectivity without having to develop custom data access programs.

Informatica

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

ACH Food, BNSF Railway Company, Illinois State University

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Informatica PowerExchange

September 2025

Free Report: FME vs. Informatica PowerExchange

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. Informatica PowerExchange and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. Informatica PowerExchange report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.