Fivetran vs SAS Access comparison

Fivetran and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAS is ranked #59. Fivetran holds a 1.9% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

4,822 Views
3,038 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

1,029 Views
813 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SAS Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Access and Fivetran are both players in the data integration space, offering unique strengths. SAS Access leads with its extensive data handling capabilities while Fivetran's automated data integration features make it more attractive in terms of functionality.

Features: SAS Access provides comprehensive data manipulation tools, supporting varied data sources and delivering robust analytics for complex datasets. Fivetran focuses on automation and user-friendliness, streamlining data pipeline integration with minimal setup. A key distinction is Fivetran's emphasis on simplified data connectivity, ideal for agile, cloud-based environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Access deployment may require dedicated IT resources, but offers detailed customer support. Fivetran offers a simple, cloud-based deployment with minimal user intervention, alongside support aimed at fast resolutions and user-friendly guidance.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access involves high upfront costs with investment in infrastructure yet promises compelling ROI for large organizations through extensive data handling. Fivetran offers a flexible pricing model, making it attractive for small to midsized enterprises with lower initial costs, and promising high ROI due to efficient deployment and maintenance.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SAS Access Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAS Access

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

59th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Access is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fivetran	1.9%
SAS Access	0.7%
Other	97.4%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has improved the way our organization functions."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"The simplicity and scalability are the strongest features of Fivetran."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

"Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic."

"The solution is stable, and we've never faced any stability issues."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

More Fivetran pros

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"The SAS/ACCESS ability to connect creates an elegant simplicity."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

Cons

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"Fivetran could improve in the area of customization, especially in how they socialize their tools."

"I would like to see an improvement in the support offered by Fivetran."

"An in-line data quality checking capability is missing"

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

More Fivetran cons

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The primary way that this product can be improved is by adjusting their pricing model."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"The solution is affordable."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 13% of the time

SAP Analytics Hub vs SAS Access

Compared 11% of the time

Toad Data Point vs SAS Access

Compared 10% of the time

Upsolver vs SAS Access

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Graph Data Connect vs SAS Access

Compared 8% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

March 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download SAS Access product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAS/Access

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.

SAS

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAS Access

March 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SAS Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SAS Access and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SAS Access report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.