Fivetran vs SAS Access comparison

Fivetran and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAS is ranked #63. Fivetran holds a 2.0% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 28 Fivetran reviews

3,915 Views
2,349 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

508 Views
366 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SAS Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Access and Fivetran are both players in the data integration space, offering unique strengths. SAS Access leads with its extensive data handling capabilities while Fivetran's automated data integration features make it more attractive in terms of functionality.

Features: SAS Access provides comprehensive data manipulation tools, supporting varied data sources and delivering robust analytics for complex datasets. Fivetran focuses on automation and user-friendliness, streamlining data pipeline integration with minimal setup. A key distinction is Fivetran's emphasis on simplified data connectivity, ideal for agile, cloud-based environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Access deployment may require dedicated IT resources, but offers detailed customer support. Fivetran offers a simple, cloud-based deployment with minimal user intervention, alongside support aimed at fast resolutions and user-friendly guidance.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access involves high upfront costs with investment in infrastructure yet promises compelling ROI for large organizations through extensive data handling. Fivetran offers a flexible pricing model, making it attractive for small to midsized enterprises with lower initial costs, and promising high ROI due to efficient deployment and maintenance.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SAS Access Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAS Access

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (7th)

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

63rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.0%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Access is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fivetran	2.0%
SAS Access	0.4%
Other	97.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Vigneswar Jeyaraj

Manager at InfoCepts

Real-time data replication and integration streamline processes and enhance productivity

The most valuable feature of Fivetran so far is the data replication. The real-time data replication is what I see best in the market where it reduces the overhead of customers needing to maintain the pipeline. Even when an error occurs, it automatically tries to solve the issue without manual interaction needed. The effectiveness of Fivetran's pre-built connectors in enhancing my customer's productivity is significant because everything is easily configurable. The documentation is very clear, so there's no difficulty in finding the necessary steps. Everything is pre-documented. The pre-built connectors that are available are excellent. Most functionalities are covered, and in most cases, it works according to expectations.

Read full review

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable feature."

"Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"The ease of setting up the connectors and transformations is highly valuable."

More Fivetran pros

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

Cons

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."

"Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services."

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

More Fivetran cons

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"The solution is affordable."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

Confluent vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Teradata vs SAS Access

Compared 52% of the time

SAP Analytics Hub vs SAS Access

Compared 48% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

October 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

September 2025

Download SAS Access product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAS/Access

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.

SAS

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAS Access

September 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SAS Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SAS Access and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SAS Access report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.