FileAudit vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

IS Decisions and OpenText are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. IS Decisions is ranked #56, while OpenText is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.0. IS Decisions holds a 0.8% mindshare in SIEM, compared to OpenText’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IS Decisions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

2,952 Views
1,978 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Read 99 OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reviews

9,332 Views
9,145 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

FileAudit

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and FileAudit compete in the IT security category. OpenText appears to have an advantage due to its robust functionality and comprehensive threat detection, while FileAudit is favored for its simplicity and effectiveness in specific tasks.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager includes comprehensive threat detection capabilities, offers integration possibilities with other OpenText products, and provides advanced analytics. FileAudit focuses on real-time monitoring of file access, has alert features that provide immediate notifications, and simplifies the tracking of file activities, catering to businesses interested in file integrity and access transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager involves a more complex deployment process that may require extensive IT involvement, although its customer support is thorough. FileAudit presents a relatively straightforward deployment with intuitive installation, coupled with efficient customer support, making it suitable for organizations with limited IT resources or those seeking faster implementation.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager represents a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set, offering greater ROI if its advanced functionalities are fully utilized by large enterprises. FileAudit offers a lower setup cost and potentially higher ROI for organizations with specific needs in file monitoring, appealing to smaller to mid-sized businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FileAudit

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

56th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (51st)

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

27th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of FileAudit is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager	1.6%
FileAudit	0.8%
Other	97.6%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

Shelesh-Kumar

Cloud Security Archirect at IBM

Unified log analysis has strengthened incident detection and supports continuous attack simulation

I do not have any areas for improvement in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) as I have not delved deeply into it; overall, it is a good package. I would like to see the detection and response features included in the next release of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), as security orchestration and automation are increasingly important.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"FileAudit has helped our client to bring order to the day-to-day management of these folders, through the use of information triggers that inform department managers of both file obsolescence and changes made by employees."

"It's a well rounded product especially with the addition of Logger and Command Center."

"The solution is very good at consolidating logs from a variety of sources."

"Thanks to Micro Focus's licensing model, as an MSSP, we are able to see a complete return on our investment almost immediately."

"From a customer perspective, the most important thing is network visibility, as companies have more visibility on what is happening in the network, so they will be able to make decisions, whether automatic or human decisions, based on the analysis given by ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), which helps improve the security within the organization."

"It's a reliable service and provides our team members with a lot of knowledge."

"The stability of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is good."

"It is a robust product and has multiple valuable features."

"Before we would have to have a large number of staff to be able to go in and do consulting opportunities, to mitigate and remediate security intrusions on given clients, now using ArcSight, albeit there may be a capital upfront cost to buy the software product, it enables us to speed our time to resolution."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pros

Cons

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"It would be nice if the interface were more user-friendly, with, for example, a minimal number of tabs to navigate."

"What could be improved in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is its analytics feature."

"It can be overloaded when rules and data monitoring are not optimized and the system receives too many events."

"Make sure you tune it to your business and infrastructure, which isn't necessarily part of technical support."

"ArcSight ESM needs to improve performance, user interface, and automation."

"Customer service during the transition from HPE to Micro Focus was abysmal where it became disruptive to our service delivery."

"I would like for them to integrate mobile devices. Integration or any kind of functionality which will act as a substitute for IBM so that we can really track our mobile devices as well as look at SIEM."

"I am having issues with report generation with older versions. I don't know if this is because of compatibility issues, but report generation has been a little bit difficult in older versions. It is not similar to the newer and current versions. We are looking at moving to the cloud. It would be good if ArcSight ESM can move to the cloud. They already seem to be working on this. It would also be very helpful and great if we can integrate external threat intelligence, machine learning, and AI into this solution. It has good dashboards, but they can always be better. Its stability can also be improved."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

"ArcSight ESM is an affordable solution, it cost approximately $200,000 for three years. This price was at a substantial discount."

"ArcSight is pretty expensive compared with its competitors. I believe that is fine as it provides value."

"Pricing is good, I'd rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being low price. It's better than Splunk and IBM QRadar because their pricing is based on EPS."

"HPE ArcSight pricing might be more expensive than other SIEM solutions, but in my opinion it has powerful features and great flexibility in developing complex use cases."

"Price-wise, ArcSight ESM was a bit high compared to competitors, which factored into our decision to switch to Splunk. It couldn't cover all our business needs for what we wanted to implement."

"Thanks to Micro Focus's licensing model, as an MSSP, we are able to see a complete return on our investment almost immediately."

"The cost of the solution is not very high, although hiring a qualified analyst to work with the product is expensive."

"It is best to be an institutional buyer and directly contact the sales team, as they can provide over-the-top discounts for bulk orders."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

23%

Construction Company

19%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	37
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	59

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

I would rate the pricing of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) around seven, as it varies based on features and demand, making it more affordable for larger organizations, while smaller one...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs FileAudit

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs FileAudit

Compared 12% of the time

EventSentry vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 6% of the time

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs FileAudit

Compared 2% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 9% of the time

SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2026

Download FileAudit product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

September 2026

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report

Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight

Overview

FileAudit provides powerful file monitoring and auditing capabilities, enabling organizations to secure sensitive data and ensure compliance. It offers real-time alerts and detailed reporting, making it a reliable choice for safeguarding data integrity.

FileAudit delivers comprehensive monitoring solutions, allowing IT departments to keep track of file access and modifications effortlessly. It empowers businesses to identify suspicious activity and unauthorized file access in real-time. With an intuitive setup process, FileAudit seamlessly integrates into existing infrastructure, enhancing security measures without causing disruptions. Its focus on user activity monitoring provides deep insights into all file interactions, supporting compliance and internal security policies effectively.

What are the most important features?

Real-Time Alerts: Notifies administrators immediately of any suspicious file activity.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports about file access for compliance.
Access Detection: Identifies unauthorized file access and usage patterns promptly.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with current IT environments without disruption.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Keeps sensitive data protected with constant monitoring.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to data protection regulations with audit trails.
Efficient Management: Saves time with automated audit processes and alerts.
Informed Decision Making: Provides insights to make strategic security improvements.

FileAudit is widely used in sectors where data integrity and access control are paramount, such as healthcare, finance, and legal industries. In these industries, it ensures compliance with strict data protection regulations and helps prevent data breaches by providing a clear view of file activity.

IS Decisions

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Event Correlation Engine: Real-time threat detection with advanced correlation capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts to enterprise-level demands and complex security needs.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple platforms and third-party tools.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored views and active lists enhance user experience.
Advanced Alerting: Provides timely incident response and security alerts.

Why should users look for reviews when evaluating OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Timely Incident Responses: Fast alerting and action against threats.
User-Friendly Experience: Customizable dashboards simplify monitoring tasks.
Comprehensive Security Management: Integrated log management and threat detection across domains.
Adaptability and Scalability: Supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.

OpenText

Sample Customers

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

September 2026

Free Report: FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.