FileAudit vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager comparison

IS Decisions and OpenText are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. IS Decisions is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. IS Decisions holds a 0.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to OpenText’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IS Decisions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

468 Views
229 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Read 98 OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reviews

2,541 Views
2,414 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

FileAudit

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and FileAudit compete in the security management domain, each with particular strengths. Data shows OpenText leads with a broader feature set, while FileAudit is preferred for its specialized auditing strengths.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager includes robust integration with various systems, high scalability, and extensive real-time monitoring. FileAudit focuses on detailed file access auditing, user activity monitoring, and an efficient alerting system.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText's deployment is favored for enterprise-grade integration and comprehensive support channels. FileAudit offers quick, lightweight deployment with a focus on ease of use and responsive customer service suitable for small to mid-sized environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText typically involves higher setup costs due to its extensive feature set, delivering strong ROI through enterprise-level benefits. FileAudit provides a cost-effective entry with quick returns by streamlining file access monitoring, noted for cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FileAudit

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

45th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (37th)

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of FileAudit is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

Gaurav Ranade

CTO at Rah Infotech Pvt Ltd

Excels at performing regression and correlation on the data

ArcSight is a legacy technology, and many customers want AI-powered technologies integrated with it. That hasn't been done yet, but ArcSight needs to catch up with the newer solutions and technologies available in the market. It can't just rely on the legacy technology from 2010 or 2012. You can't run that in 2024. It's a legacy technology with its own limitations. Customers often face issues that other software or newer solutions can resolve easily. That's the main challenge we face from customers right now. So, the only concerns are that AI needs to be integrated and scalability improved. Those are the main areas to be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature is the correlation of different logs that are collected."

"I value the event correlation of this product."

"It is a robust product and has multiple valuable features."

"Feature-rich solution which provides better network visibility for improved security"

"It makes maintenance very easy."

"Customization. ArcSight gives you a platform to on-board out-of-the-box devices with a more accurate way of collecting desired logs/events."

"The user interfaces are quite good and speedy."

"Usability is the most valuable feature. The accessibility is quite good."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pros

Cons

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"In certain cases, this product does have false positives, which the company should work on."

"When I asked our networking juniors for a comparison between LogRhythm and ArcSight, they said that both platforms are almost the same. It is just that LogRhythm is more modern with a digital platform, which probably gives it some advantage over ArcSight. ArcSight is a very old and mature product that is running on an old platform. It is an old legacy platform. In terms of new features, it just requires platform upgrades so that it becomes lighter and easily adaptable, specifically in the cloud. It would be a good thing if they can also make reporting easier."

"The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible."

"The UI interface is somewhat complex and needs to be simplified."

"There are several improvements that we would like to see, including: Building a system based on a log collection (SOC), a scenario for external encroachment, and Operator training."

"When we need to consume old events, we have to wait for a long time. ArcSight should improve the database capability to reply to queries faster. It would also be interesting if they implemented network visibility. For example, they could add a feature like NetWitness with a model just for looking through the packets."

"Currently lacks SOAR feature."

"Administration of ArcSight is not an easy job. The admin needs to be well experienced in it to identify the root cause and fix it."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

"The licensing cost is affordable if you get an enterprise license. The licensing is based on EPS, so you can probably provide a package of license for multiple ESMs with their correlational end fees. It is cost-effective."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"Pricing is good, I'd rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being low price. It's better than Splunk and IBM QRadar because their pricing is based on EPS."

"Customers without a ton of resources to dedicate to deployment may be better served by a managed ArcSight service."

"It's a good price, it's one of the cheaper solutions."

"Price-wise, ArcSight ESM was a bit high compared to competitors, which factored into our decision to switch to Splunk. It couldn't cover all our business needs for what we wanted to implement."

"The pricing is great compared to others."

"ArcSight is pretty expensive compared with its competitors. I believe that is fine as it provides value."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FileAudit?

It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FileAudit?

The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks. It would be great if the aforementioned details wer...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FileAudit?

My company uses FileAudit as an SIEM solution, and it is used for monitoring the file server activity to find out what users did in the file server, which may include modifying the file, deleting i...

See all answers

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 57% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs FileAudit

Compared 43% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 6% of the time

SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2025

Download FileAudit product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

August 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report

Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight

Overview

Agentless, remote and non-intrusive, FileAudit offers a simple more user-friendly way to safeguard and secure file access in a Windows environment. FileAudit provides real-time monitoring and alerting on all access (or access attempts). FileAudit also implements contextual functions such as mass access and alteration alerts, tracking source IP address information for remote data access, and providing granular time and date alerting parameters to monitor folder and file access at unusual or unexpected times.

IS Decisions

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Event Correlation Engine: Real-time threat detection with advanced correlation capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts to enterprise-level demands and complex security needs.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple platforms and third-party tools.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored views and active lists enhance user experience.
Advanced Alerting: Provides timely incident response and security alerts.

Why should users look for reviews when evaluating OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Timely Incident Responses: Fast alerting and action against threats.
User-Friendly Experience: Customizable dashboards simplify monitoring tasks.
Comprehensive Security Management: Integrated log management and threat detection across domains.
Adaptability and Scalability: Supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.

OpenText

Sample Customers

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

July 2025

Free Report: FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FileAudit vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.