FileAudit vs Mezmo comparison

IS Decisions and Mezmo are both solutions in the Log Management category. IS Decisions is ranked #54, while Mezmo is ranked #55. IS Decisions holds a 0.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Mezmo’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IS Decisions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

860 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

974 Views
575 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FileAudit

Mezmo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

FileAudit and Mezmo compete in the file monitoring and data logging category. Mezmo often stands out for its robust feature set that users feel warrants its expense, while FileAudit is preferred for simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Features: FileAudit offers real-time monitoring, seamless Windows integration, and straightforward usability. Mezmo provides centralized log management, advanced analytics, and depth of features that many users find compelling.

Room for Improvement: FileAudit users note areas for growth in scalability, dashboard customization, and advanced functionalities. Mezmo could enhance its documentation, initial setup processes, and user guidance during onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FileAudit is recognized for easy deployment and responsive customer service. Mezmo, while initially more complex to set up, offers significant flexibility once deployed. Both companies are praised for customer support, but FileAudit is particularly supportive during initial deployment.

Pricing and ROI: FileAudit's competitive pricing and quick ROI attract users. Despite Mezmo's higher initial cost, it is perceived as offering substantial ROI due to its comprehensive features, making its premium pricing justified by those who value its deep insights.

To learn more, read our detailed FileAudit vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. Mezmo

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FileAudit

Ranking in Log Management

54th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (61st)

Mezmo

Ranking in Log Management

55th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (75th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of FileAudit is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FileAudit	0.4%
Mezmo	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities

Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

Cons

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Transportation Company

26%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs FileAudit

Compared 38% of the time

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 20% of the time

Trellix Helix Connect vs FileAudit

Compared 10% of the time

Change Auditor for Windows File Servers vs FileAudit

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs FileAudit

Compared 8% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 20% of the time

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Mezmo

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Mezmo

Compared 8% of the time

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Mezmo

Compared 8% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download FileAudit product report

Buyer's Guide

Cribl vs. Mezmo

December 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Also Known As

No data available

LogDNA

Overview

Agentless, remote and non-intrusive, FileAudit offers a simple more user-friendly way to safeguard and secure file access in a Windows environment. FileAudit provides real-time monitoring and alerting on all access (or access attempts). FileAudit also implements contextual functions such as mass access and alteration alerts, tracking source IP address information for remote data access, and providing granular time and date alerting parameters to monitor folder and file access at unusual or unexpected times.

IS Decisions

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Sample Customers

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. Mezmo

December 2025

Free Report: FileAudit vs. Mezmo

Find out what your peers are saying about FileAudit vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FileAudit vs. Mezmo report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.