No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Fastpath Assure vs Safe-T Secure Application Access comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fastpath Assure
Ranking in Access Management
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (24th)
Safe-T Secure Application A...
Ranking in Access Management
35th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (30th), ZTNA (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Fastpath Assure is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safe-T Secure Application Access is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Access Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fastpath Assure0.9%
Safe-T Secure Application Access1.2%
Other97.9%
Access Management
 

Featured Reviews

Fouad Chundoo - PeerSpot reviewer
Group Manager, Internal Audit at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Access reviews have identified critical user risks and now optimize ongoing license usage
The best feature of Fastpath Assure is the dashboard, which allows you to click and see all details immediately, showing where the loopholes are. The aspect of the dashboard I find most helpful is its visualization; it is a very nice dashboard compared to the previous version. Fastpath Assure has positively impacted our organization by enabling us to identify loopholes in excessive access rights granted to different users, and we are also working on minimizing our license costs. As for the outcomes, we have received proper feedback from users thanks to Fastpath Assure. Users were not using the system as they should have, but now we can pinpoint where the loopholes are, and hopefully, by the end of this year or next year, we will work on improving those areas in terms of segregation of duties.
it_user787671 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network and Security Engineer
Needs to be easier to configure and to display logs more simply
We use only it for scanning files for viruses. That's the only feature we use in this product It needs to be easier to configure, it should be something that's working well with other sources. It should be something that allows me to see the logs simply. One to three years. Sometimes it doesn't…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fastpath Assure has positively impacted our organization by enabling us to identify loopholes in excessive access rights granted to different users, and we are also working on minimizing our license costs."
"If you need a solution for sending big files to customers or for receiving large files from them, this is a very good solution."
"This product allows us to actually send it straight from our email to the other person's email in a safe way, where we can meet all our regulations and still keep the data in our control."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"At the end of the day it's really good and really improved."
"We use only it for scanning files for viruses."
"From a technical point of view, products are stable and scalable, and we do appreciate the personal touch the sales engineers (SE) support and development bring, as well as the personal touch of the sales support, the free online, and web-based training."
"You can easily integrate it and fit the system to your organization's needs, and that's a very huge advantage."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has a plug-in for Outlook."
 

Cons

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that it is quite expensive, but with Fastpath Assure, we have identified areas where we are paying more for licensing."
"Better UI. A better UI for the people that manage all the processes of Safe-T. Some of the UI is not as intuitive as you would like it to be."
"Setting up Safe-T SDE is very complex. It is not straightforward, and it requires much understanding on the concepts of the product."
"In terms of improvement, they need to be much more strict regarding the roadmap, about timelines and when new features will be up in production."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"When we have something that we want improved, it takes a little bit of time until it can be fixed."
"I'm not sure what advice I would give others about this product because I don't like Safe-T."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
"The cloud solution is not that great especially with Swiss customers."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
12%
Performing Arts
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Safe-T SDA, Safe-T, Safe-T Software-Defined Access
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Government of Israel, eviCore Healthcore, Glen Imaging, Sarin, LBG, Rollomatic, Boegli-Gravures SA, Banque Heritage, Groupe Minoteries, Temenos, ZEK, RLM Finsbury, Harel Insurance, Meitav Dash
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, One Identity and others in Access Management. Updated: September 2026.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.