ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

ExtraHop Networks and IBM are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #41, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. ExtraHop Networks holds a 1.0% mindshare in XDR, compared to IBM’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

IBM Security QRadar and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 are competing products in the network security market. IBM Security QRadar has an upper hand in seamless integration with existing systems and cost-effectiveness, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 impresses with superior features, particularly in advanced threat detection.

Features:IBM Security QRadar offers scalable architecture, comprehensive log management, and efficient threat intelligence. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 provides exceptional visibility into network traffic, real-time threat detection, and rapid investigation tools. QRadar focuses on log analytics, whereas Reveal(x) 360 concentrates on behavior analytics and real-time network monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:IBM Security QRadar ensures a straightforward deployment and robust support, facilitating seamless integration within existing infrastructure. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 uses cloud-based deployment, offering flexibility and scalability with potential challenges in complex environments. QRadar is noted for immediate support availability, while ExtraHop’s service benefits from its flexible deployment model suitable for cloud-first strategies.

Pricing and ROI:IBM Security QRadar presents a competitive pricing structure favorable to budget-conscious organizations, often yielding faster ROI due to lower initial costs and comprehensive support. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360, despite its higher price point, offers substantial ROI through enhanced threat detection and operational efficiencies. QRadar is affordable, while Reveal(x) 360 focuses on investment value with advanced technology.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. IBM Security QRadar Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. IBM Security QRadar

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 4.7%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security QRadar is 3.2%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	4.7%
IBM Security QRadar	3.2%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360	1.0%
Other	91.1%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

HarshBhardiya

SOC Engineer at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Have managed daily asset and alert monitoring effectively but have encountered limitations with manual processes and interface usability

It's still very manual and doesn't work on its own. It's still in an early stage and not on par where we can consider it a really successful detection system. The accuracy is not there. The UI could be better when compared to Sentinels where we can use flags and tagging. It could be much more user-friendly. IBM Security QRadar has all features and is fully competitive with other SIEM tools, but when it comes to user-friendliness, a new user takes time to get used to it. More intuitive, user-friendly interfaces and more helpful documentation would be beneficial. The query searching and data fetching could be faster. In large to very large organizations with around 5,000 or 6,000 assets or beyond, even with proper configurations and RAM and hardware backing up, the query is fairly slow.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex is a very good total solution on the endpoints."

"Palo Alto is the best security solution in the market."

"Implementing Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has had a significant impact on my security analyst workload because it becomes much easier."

"Monitoring is most valuable."

"When the pandemic started, Palo Alto came up with many solutions, which helped with the quick shift from on-premises to the cloud."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

"Cortex XDR can integrate the firewalls and determine the tendencies of the attacks. It's a new generation antivirus, with protection endpoints and detection response. It is very easy to use and everybody can operate the solution."

"We have found in our test Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to be a very good tool."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"Their technical support is more effective and of better quality than other competitors."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"It is scalable."

"With QRadar, you can do all these, even if you are not a security expert."

"Tech support is excellent."

"Curator is the leader of teams in the market; it's a product with plenty of features and capabilities, and it's a very powerful solution."

"I think QRadar is stable and currently satisfies my needs."

"We have much better visibility into our environment now."

"It's a state-of-the-art product for security information and event management (SIEM)."

"I have found its network traffic log, network bit log, and QBI most valuable."

"It saves a lot of time. We integrate the customer's firewall with all their networking devices."

More IBM Security QRadar pros

Cons

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can improve mobile integration to allow access to the console."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"It's very time-consuming to log support issues and the people that answer the tickets aren't very knowledgeable."

"A better pricing plan would make this product more competitive."

"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response."

"The product's pricing could be better."

"Dashboards do not allow everyone to see what's happening."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"Their professional service can be improved."

"There needs to be more support."

"The quality of technical support depends on the IBM support person. Sometimes, it's hard to get the right person on the other side. A ticket coordinator could be the key to better quality delivery."

"With IBM Security QRadar, my company faced issues with the support we received for the product."

"The solution's technical support works, but sometimes, it can take quite a long time to get a solution from technical support."

"The product can be a bit complex."

"It's still very manual and doesn't work on its own. It's still in an early stage and not on par where we can consider it a really successful detection system."

"The weak signal detection with QRadar needs improvement. You can detect what you know, but what is unknown to the rule engine can't be detected."

"For the common needs of clients to fulfill requirements, a real integration with Blueworks Live (BPA modeling tool also from IBM) and a more suitable BPM on cloud solution for midsize customers."

"There could be better integration with the solution."

More IBM Security QRadar cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive solution."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"I am using the Community edition."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

"The solution comes with a high price tag, while some of the competitors provide identical functionality in their offerings at no extra cost."

"It is overly expensive and overly complex in terms of licensing. They have many different appliances, which makes it extremely difficult to choose the technology. It is very difficult to choose the technology or QRadar components that you should be deploying. They have improved some of it in the last few years. They have made it slightly easy with the fact that you can now buy virtual versions of all the appliances, which is good, but it is still very fragmented. For instance, on some of the smaller appliances, there is no upgrade path. So, if you exceed the capacity of the appliance, you have to buy a bigger appliance, which is not helpful because it is quite a major cost. If you want to add more disks to the system, they'll say that you can't."

"Licensing can be costly depending on your architecture."

"They can give us some scalability and flexibility on pricing. If its pricing can be reduced, it would help a lot of customers in bringing in a new SIEM environment and grow business in the market. If I start a license today and take around 10,000 EPS, and after a month, there is an increase in the number of clients on my platform, I can increase the number of licenses. I can add 5,000 EPS on a yearly basis."

"I think that the price is fair, but we can always say that the price could be cheaper."

"The price of this product is high."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"There is a license required for this solution."

More IBM Security QRadar pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	49

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	92
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	106

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendli...

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Security QRadar?

Pricing and the license of EPS were managed by the governance team. I was not responsible for managing those. I was s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Vectra AI vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 7% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

Wazuh vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 3% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Security vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 4% of the time

Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs IBM Security QRadar

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Security QRadar Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

May 2026

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security QRadar

May 2026

Download IBM Security QRadar product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers advanced network detection and response capabilities, designed to provide real-time situational awareness and threat detection across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Built to meet the demands of modern enterprises, ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 enhances visibility into network activities, delivering comprehensive security insights. It uses high-speed data analysis to identify anomalous behaviors and potential threats, helping security teams respond effectively. With centralized visibility, it ensures quick detection and thorough investigation of threats within complex infrastructures, including cloud, edge, and on-premises environments.

What key features does ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offer?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Monitors network traffic in real-time for immediate threat identification.
Centralized Visibility: Offers a unified dashboard for observing activities across diverse environments.
Automated Response: Enables predefined actions to mitigate threats swiftly without manual intervention.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools for enhanced incident management.
Advanced Analytics: Utilizes machine learning to detect sophisticated threats promptly.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

Improved Security Posture: Evidence of enhanced organizational security through faster threat detection and response.
Operational Efficiency: Reduction in time and effort for IT teams due to automated processes.
Scalability: Flexibility to expand with organizational growth and technology changes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Attractive pricing compared to functionality and outcomes offered.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is implemented across industries such as financial services, healthcare, and retail, where robust security measures are paramount. In these sectors, the capabilities of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 align with the need for secure handling of sensitive data and compliance with industry regulations, providing valuable protection and detection capabilities.

ExtraHop Networks

IBM Security QRadar offers real-time threat detection, data correlation, and integration with third-party solutions, providing a user-friendly interface, scalability, and extensive reporting capabilities for SIEM needs.

IBM Security QRadar is designed for comprehensive security monitoring in diverse environments, aiding sectors like telecom and finance with advanced threat detection and breach management. It aggregates data and analyzes user behavior, while its customizable and out-of-the-box rules deliver robust security insights and vulnerability management. The platform seeks enhancements in integration, performance, and user interface, with a focus on AI and cloud service compatibility.

What are the most important features of IBM Security QRadar?

Real-time Threat Detection: Monitors and alerts on security incidents as they happen.
Data Correlation: Aggregates and connects disparate data sources for cohesive analysis.
Third-party Integration: Supports seamless interaction with other security tools.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs without sacrificing performance.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored security settings for specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Enhanced Security Insights: Offers comprehensive coverage across environments.
Reduced False Positives: Minimizes unnecessary alerts, improving efficiency.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and analysis tasks.
Extensive Reporting Capabilities: Provides detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Compliance Focus: Assists in meeting regulatory standards effectively.

Telecom, finance, and cloud-based industries implement IBM Security QRadar for threat detection, compliance, and security monitoring. It is deployed for log collection and correlation, user behavior analytics, and ensuring secure data transfer and incident management, focusing on compliance and anomaly detection.

IBM

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Wizards of the Coast

Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. IBM Security QRadar

April 2026

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. IBM Security QRadar

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. IBM Security QRadar report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.