Exabeam vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM comparison

Exabeam and Logsign are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Exabeam is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.4, while Logsign is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.7. Exabeam holds a 1.5% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Logsign’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Logsign users who would recommend it.

Exabeam

Read 19 Exabeam reviews

3,893 Views
2,180 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Read 4 Logsign Next-Gen SIEM reviews

846 Views
491 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Exabeam

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Exabeam and Logsign Next-Gen SIEM are two leading products in the SIEM market. Exabeam seems to have the upper hand in terms of comprehensive features and advanced analytics, whereas Logsign stands out in cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: Exabeam offers advanced threat detection, automated response capabilities, and in-depth analytics. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is known for ease of integration, customization options, and user-friendly tools.

Room for Improvement: Exabeam could enhance reporting functions, simplify configurations, and improve user experience. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM needs better scalability, more advanced threat intelligence features, and expanded capabilities for larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam has a longer deployment process with detailed support, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM ensures quicker, smoother deployment with responsive customer support. Exabeam's deployment can be resource-intensive, whereas Logsign accommodates smaller IT teams with its simple and fast setup.

Pricing and ROI: Exabeam's higher pricing is justified by its comprehensive features, leading to solid ROI. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM's affordability offers exceptional value, preferred by smaller organizations for lower setup costs and effective performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Exabeam vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Exabeam

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Security Incident Response (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (13th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (14th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (11th)

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

46th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Exabeam is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Stephen-Armstrong

Cyber Security Analyst at Capgemini

The SIEM provides a user-friendly UI experience

When events come into the system, the dashboard categorizes them by the highest risk score, not when they appear on the system. When you've got multiple ongoing incidents you can only see the highest risk score at the top of the list rather than the most recent detection. Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection.

Read full review

Ayaz Ahmed

Cyber Security Specialist at lums

Works well for threat detection and security

Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively. There should be a focus on delivering alerts tailored to specific needs rather than overwhelming users with numerous alerts. Additionally, incorporating more mature data about threats is necessary for better threat detection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."

"The ThreatHunter in Advanced Analytics is the most valuable. It helps analyze compromised assets and provides analysis for any entity within my client's environment."

"The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."

"The Exabeam SIEM has a user friendly UI interface."

"Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."

"Exabeam includes machine learning features and out-of-the-box rules that we rely on."

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions."

"I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it. The solution has the ability to build a session, basically. It pulls a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe. It's quite helpful."

More Exabeam pros

"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."

"It has full automation and automated SIEM responses."

"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."

Cons

"Updating the new release of Exabeam Fusion SIEM takes time and slows our performance."

"The only problem is that the UI is not very impressive."

"The organzation is rigid and not flexible in the way they operate"

"The customer service and support are not satisfactory."

"Exabeam should be a bit faster, especially in loading and vulnerability scanning."

"We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with."

"We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules."

"Exabeam needs to improve its adaptive nature towards rules and its capability to understand the entire client environment faster."

More Exabeam cons

"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."

"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."

"AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."

"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."

"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."

"Compared to other SIEMs, it has low pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules. I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features. We are conside...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

It does not have much AI and machine learning features yet. They are developing them and will be releasing them in a few months.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

We use Logsign SIEM for various tasks in our daily operations. One key use case is for forensic analysis. We also use it to monitor critical servers and generate security alerts for actions like lo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine. I can recommend it. Not for large enterp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam

Compared 6% of the time

Gurucul UEBA vs Exabeam

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Exabeam

Compared 5% of the time

More Exabeam Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 21% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 21% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 14% of the time

Wazuh vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 12% of the time

More Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam

August 2025

Download Exabeam product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2025

Download Logsign Next-Gen SIEM product report

Overview

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

Logsign delivers automation-driven cyber security solutions and are committed to providing the smartest, easiest-to-use and most affordable cybersecurity detection and response solutions and value-added services. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is an enterprise-grade SIEM, inline with our promise, it's easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable unlike the other enterprise-grade SIEM softwares.

Easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable SIEM for all.
Unlimited scalability, high availability - cluster SIEM, big data infrastructure.
Deploy on every environment, on-premise solution.
400+ predefined integrations and free plugin service.
Collects & stores unlimited data.
Threat hunting, fast search & investigation, advanced behavior analysis, IOC detection.
Real-time detection & prevention, wide correlation library based on Mitre Att&ck framework.
Real-time monitoring, predefined dashboards & reports, meeting compliance requirements (PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOX and more).
Automated notifications, automated actions.
Flexible pricing options, and more information and for more automated response features, please look for our SOAR platform.

Logsign

Sample Customers

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank

Turkish Petroleum, Tırsan, DP World, SAC American Colleges, Robert College, Unlu&Co, UniCo Insurance Company, ETSTur, CK Energy, UEDAS Energy, Wilo, Eurocross Assistance, Deloitte Turkey, Incı GS Yuasa, Pappara, Bilgi University, Anadolu University, İstanbul University, The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, TRT, Anadolu Media Agency, Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services, Ispark, Spor AS and wide range of enterprises in different industries.

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

July 2025

Free Report: Exabeam vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Exabeam vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.