Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs LogRhythm UEBA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Exabeam Logo
2,611 views|1,257 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
LogRhythm Logo
435 views|373 comparisons
62% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Exabeam Fusion SIEM and LogRhythm UEBA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. LogRhythm UEBA Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good.""The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it.""The most valuable feature of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is the easy-to-use user interface.""Timeline based analysis; good platform support""The solution's initial setup process is easy.""Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions.""The advanced analytics has a really great overview of user behavior.""The setup is not difficult. It was easy."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pros →

"It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm.""What I like most about LogRhythm UEBA is that it allows you to identify and analyze end-user behaviors and suspicious activities within the systems.""The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance, it can detect unusual user logins, such as a user logging in from a new browser or location.""The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring.""LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs.""It has a lot of features. It has file integration monitoring.""The tool's most valuable feature is server threat hunting.""The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting."

More LogRhythm UEBA Pros →

Cons
"The organzation is rigid and not flexible in the way they operate""I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product.""We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment.""The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward.""We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with.""Updating the new release of Exabeam Fusion SIEM takes time and slows our performance.""They need to focus on more of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and coverage. They claim they cover about 70 to 80%. I'm not sure if it's really quite that much, however.""They should provide detailed information about detecting phishing emails."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Cons →

"LogRhythm UEBA's data aggregation needs to be improved. Open-source users do not have much documentation available. Documentation is available only for enterprise users.""The cloud version is lacking and not up to par.""What needs improvement in LogRhythm UEBA is the pricing. Here in Asia, for example, in Sri Lanka, pricing is the primary concern, and this is the only area for improvement I see in the product.""The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other tools. Its machine-learning capabilities need to improve when compared to other solutions. It lacks risk quantification in a single, transparent view for individuals such as CSOs.""The UI could be improved a little bit.""The search feature needs to be improved.""It would be helpful if there were more guidance provided for integrating with unsupported devices.""It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."

More LogRhythm UEBA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
  • "There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
  • "Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."
  • "The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."
  • "As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."
  • "It is quite a budget-friendly product."
  • "LogRhythm UEBA's pricing is affordable for small and medium businesses."
  • "I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."
  • More LogRhythm UEBA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's initial setup process is easy.
    Top Answer:The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive.
    Top Answer:The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,611
    Comparisons
    1,257
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    477
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    435
    Comparisons
    373
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA
    Learn More
    Overview

    Exabeam Fusion SIEM is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

    -Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
    -Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
    -Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
    -Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
    -Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
    -Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

    LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML).

    Sample Customers
    Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise23%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. LogRhythm UEBA
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. LogRhythm UEBA and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Exabeam Fusion SIEM is ranked 5th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 10 reviews while LogRhythm UEBA is ranked 12th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 10 reviews. Exabeam Fusion SIEM is rated 8.0, while LogRhythm UEBA is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Exabeam Fusion SIEM writes "Enables centralized log collection on a single platform". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm UEBA writes "Detects unusual logins but dashboards need improvement ". Exabeam Fusion SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Enterprise Security, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas LogRhythm UEBA is most compared with Wazuh, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Deep Discovery and Aruba IntroSpect. See our Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. LogRhythm UEBA report.

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.