Splunk Observability Cloud and Evanios are competitors in IT monitoring and observability. Splunk appears to have the upper hand in data analytics, whereas Evanios distinguishes itself with integrated IT service management capabilities.
Features: Splunk Observability Cloud includes advanced analytics, real-time monitoring, and reliable data visualization tools, which enable significant data insights. Evanios excels in its seamless integration with IT service management platforms, increasing productivity through automation and offering a more unified approach to incident management, giving it an edge in integration features.
Room for Improvement: Splunk could benefit from deeper integrations with IT service management tools and improved initial deployment timelines. Improvements in alert customization and extending the variety of built-in integrations can also be considered. Evanios may enhance by offering more intuitive interfaces and streamlining setup processes further. A wider range of analytics features and support for additional third-party systems would be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud offers a simple deployment process supported by a flexible ecosystem. It provides various support options, ensuring a smooth implementation. Evanios requires a customized setup due to its extensive integration capabilities with service tools, which might extend deployment times. However, its personalized deployment approach and commitment to customer interaction provide significant added value.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud offers more budget-friendly setup options with rapid ROI, owing to its efficient data analytics. Its streamlined implementation contributes to faster return on investment. Evanios, while involving potentially higher initial costs, justifies them with extensive features and an integrated ecosystem that delivers substantial value, particularly beneficial for businesses focusing on comprehensive IT service management.
Using Splunk has saved my organization about 30% of our budget compared to using multiple different monitoring products.
Anyone working in front-end management should recognize the market price to see the true value of end-user monitoring.
Problem resolution typically takes between two and five days, which isn't very helpful.
Support from Splunk is not very helpful because Splunk doesn't have a dedicated APM; they only have one APM engineer in Korea.
They did not have a clear answer.
We've used the solution across more than 250 people, including engineers.
I would rate its scalability a nine out of ten.
The issue is mainly about pricing because if they want to monitor more, it costs money.
We rarely have problems accessing the dashboard or the page.
Unlike NetScout or regular agents for APM, RUM has many problems during the POC phase because customer environments vary widely.
I would rate its stability a nine out of ten.
It would be beneficial if server details could be retrieved directly in synthetic monitoring.
There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available.
Improvements in dashboard configuration, customization, and artificial intelligence functionalities are desired.
Splunk is a bit expensive since it charges based on the indexing rate of data.
Splunk is a little expensive, however, it is in line with the current market pricing.
Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive.
It offers unified visibility for logs, metrics, and traces.
The solution overall is very valuable for me. The time to value was immediate.
Splunk provides advanced notifications of roadblocks in the application, which helps us to improve and avoid impacts during high-volume days.
A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.
Reduce the noise
Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.
Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.
What are the key features?In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.