We performed a comparison between ESET EDR/XDR and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The solution is easy to use."
"The tool's most valuable features are security and integration with other tenants."
"Having access to Azure Active Directory on the cloud gives us speed and use of the latest technology. The application services are very good, such as GitHub."
"It's a quite comprehensive solution and it scales quite well within our required scale as well, which is very useful."
"When logging on to Azure AD it's pretty quick."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID is its security options, where we can provide highly effective security for user accounts during authentication."
"I like that you can run it on-premises. I also like that I can use Azure at any time as the main one."
"We have the ability to define the email user in the designated field."
"Multi-factor authentication (MFA) has improved our customers' security posture. Multi-factor authentication has two layers of authentication, which helps in case you input your credentials into a phishing website and then it has access to your credentials. So if they use your credentials, then you have proof on your phone that was sent to the end user."
"The solution could improve how it scours each website."
"The security policy of Azure Active Directory should be based on a matrix so that we can easily visualize which users have access to what."
"My only pain point in this solution is creating group membership for devices."
"Microsoft Authenticator can improve their notifications because sometimes, my team doesn't receive notifications about app updates and authentication failures."
"I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement."
"When you fix the rules and permissions, working directly on the manifest, you really need to have in-depth knowledge. If there were a graphical user interface to update the manifest, that would be good."
"It would be an improvement if Authenticator made it easier to recover the app if you reboot your cellphone and lose access."
"Azure AD needs to be more in sync. The synchronization can be time-consuming."
"The role-based access control can be improved. Normally, the role-based access control has different privileges. Each role, such as administrator or user, has different privileges, and the setup rules for them should be defined automatically rather than doing it manually."
ESET EDR/XDR is ranked 37th in Authentication Systems with 1 review while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Authentication Systems with 190 reviews. ESET EDR/XDR is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ESET EDR/XDR writes "An easy-to-use solution that could improve it’s website-scouring capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". ESET EDR/XDR is most compared with Wazuh, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Microsoft Defender XDR and Cisco Duo, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, Yubico YubiKey, Cisco Duo and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.