


Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum and ESET PROTECT Enterprise are endpoint security solutions with notable distinctions. Kaspersky appears to have an edge due to its broader range of features and comprehensive protection, while ESET is noted for its performance on older systems with solid security features.
Features: Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers advanced malware blocking, an effective firewall, and strong centralized management. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of use, and integration capabilities. ESET PROTECT Enterprise provides strong performance on older hardware, real-time analytics, and threat detection capabilities, with efficient firewall policy management but lacks some advanced features found in Kaspersky.
Room for Improvement: Kaspersky's users mention high resource consumption, a complex upgrade process, and the need for better reporting and integration. ESET users call for improved automation, better scalability for large operations, and enhanced mobile device management. Both solutions could benefit from advancements in machine learning and AI capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky supports various deployment environments but centers on on-premises solutions, offering extensive global support with varied response times. ESET provides both on-premises and cloud options, noted for faster setup and support turnaround, but both may experience challenges in customizing deployment and support interactions.
Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky's pricing is seen as potentially expensive, especially with bundled features like EDR, but it provides a competitive ROI through improved security outcomes. ESET PROTECT Enterprise is considered affordable and cost-effective, with competitive pricing but sometimes appears higher relative to some competitor solutions.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
The return on investment is excellent due to its functionality and ease of installation.
There was money saving from using ESET PROTECT Enterprise, which is why I switched from CrowdStrike to ESET.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
The tech support from ESET is amazing, and I would rate it as ten out of ten.
They are very responsive and help in solving issues quickly.
Even if support is addressing my problem, if the two issues I mentioned are not resolved, then the support process is not complete.
The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive.
I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
It can efficiently scale up to thousands of devices in an organization without issues.
I have used many products before, and this solution is definitely scalable.
It is better suited for workstations rather than server environments.
Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.
Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
When it performs an update, ESET PROTECT Enterprise should request permission for restarting because otherwise, users lose their work.
The solution is stable, and I have not encountered any glitches.
The solution is very, very stable.
There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Sometimes, agents lose connection with the management console, and the administration team needs to reinstall the agents on the computers.
They need to reduce the number of notifications on the endpoints.
It takes a lot of processing power when the machine is initially booted.
Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years.
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
I pay 40 dollars per agent annually, which is cheaper than 60 dollars per agent for Check Point.
We recently paid fourteen dollars and thirty-six cents per unit for 20 users, which is reasonable.
Comparing it to other solutions in the market, it was slightly higher.
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
It allows simple whitelisting and has a learning mode for new installations, which reduces false positives by adapting to typical user habits.
Its web component prevents infections from malicious websites, which enhances its anti-malware capabilities.
One of the strong features of ESET PROTECT Enterprise is its ability to work well on old computers.
It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures.
The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention.
The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 4.6% |
| Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum | 1.5% |
| ESET PROTECT Enterprise | 1.2% |
| Other | 92.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
ESET PROTECT Enterprise is a robust security platform for threat detection and management, offering features like dynamic folders and reporting tools. It provides online transaction security and effective threat protection with tools for compliance and policy customization.
Designed for advanced threat management, ESET PROTECT Enterprise offers a range of features to enhance online security. The straightforward console aids in managing dynamic groups and EDR capabilities efficiently. Zero-Day protection and customizable policies ensure compliance, while its resource-efficient design supports older hardware. Despite needing improvements in remote deployment, user-friendliness, and connection stability, it remains a compelling choice for managing computers, extending antivirus protections, and handling device management across multiple operating systems.
What are the key features of ESET PROTECT Enterprise?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, ESET PROTECT Enterprise is implemented for its reliable security and management of endpoint devices. It automates antivirus installations and enhances web filtering to safeguard critical systems and data. Many sectors rely on its capability to isolate compromised systems and manage policy applications on-premises or during a cloud transition.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust protection and user-friendly detection tools beyond endpoints for small to mid-sized businesses, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with essential EDR and seamless XDR integration.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum unites endpoint protection with automatic response capabilities, allowing businesses to identify, analyze, and neutralize threats efficiently. With features like antivirus, firewall, encryption, centralized management, and robust reporting, it supports multiple platforms and enhances secure environments for computers, servers, and networks. While user satisfaction is high due to its straightforward management and modular capabilities, some desire improvements in performance, AI integration, and cloud compatibility. Enhanced support, training, and simpler updates are also sought, though organizations value its effectiveness against malware and spyware. Despite high pricing and resource demands, Kaspersky's user-friendly approach and integration capabilities remain appreciated.
What are the features of Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum?
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
Organizations rely on Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum for endpoint protection against cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. Deployed across computers, servers, and mobile environments, it allows for centralized manageability, device control, and web access control. This approach ensures comprehensive security updates, file encryption, and efficient network activity monitoring, making it suitable for diverse business implementations.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.