QPR ProcessDesigner vs erwin Data Modeler comparison

Quest Software and QPR Software are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Quest Software is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while QPR Software is ranked #26. Quest Software holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to QPR Software’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Modeler

Read 39 erwin Data Modeler reviews

5,179 Views
1,554 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

QPR ProcessDesigner

Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews

236 Views
234 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Data Modeler

QPR ProcessDesigner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 19, 2025

QPR ProcessDesigner and erwin Data Modeler compete in process design and data modeling. QPR ProcessDesigner has an edge in pricing and support, while erwin Data Modeler stands out for its comprehensive features, justifying its cost.

Features: QPR ProcessDesigner offers a user-friendly interface for process management, effective process mapping, and workflow analysis. Erwin Data Modeler supports robust database modeling, data visualization, and integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR ProcessDesigner is easy to deploy, with responsive customer service for quick system integration. Erwin Data Modeler requires more technical steps for deployment but has extensive documentation and reliable technical support.

Pricing and ROI: QPR ProcessDesigner is cost-effective, with a low initial cost and quick ROI through process efficiency. Erwin Data Modeler requires a higher upfront investment but its features can lead to significant long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed QPR ProcessDesigner vs. erwin Data Modeler Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

QPR ProcessDesigner vs. erwin Data Modeler

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Modeler

Ranking in Business Process Design

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (4th)

QPR ProcessDesigner

Ranking in Business Process Design

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of erwin Data Modeler is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

JorgeSanz

Data Governance Senior Advisor at Abu Dhabi National Oil Company

Streamline data modeling and automate network changes for increased efficiency

The initial setup depends on the tool if you are using the data model environment. Stopping the server could be complex and require strong expertise. If you have everything set up and configured, Erwin is straightforward. You can deploy it in a few hours. In our case, it took a couple of months to address internal conditions, assign machines, and set up everything for the services. I rate the initial setup a six out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

it_user794370

‎Senior Advisor with 1-10 employees

It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes

BPM/BPI activities in various business areas. This has been particularly useful in end user workshops where people are able to see and comment on actual process model immediately. This focuses communication and makes it easier to avoid misunderstandings Processes become clearer, easier to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team is fine."

"What has been useful, I have been able to reverse engineer our existing data models to document explicitly referential integrity relationships, primary/foreign keys in the model, and create ERDs that are subject area-based which our clients can use when working with our databases. The reality is that our databases are not explicitly documented in the DDL with primary/foreign key relationships. You can't look at the DDL and explicitly understand the primary/foreign key relationships that exist between our tables, so the referential integrity is not easily understood. erwin has allowed me to explicitly document that and create ERDs. This has made it easier for our clients to consume our databases for their own purposes."

"Any tool will do diagramming but I think the ability to put the stuff up in a graphical fashion, then think about it, and keep things consistent is what's valuable about it. It's too easy when you're using other methods to not have naming consistent standards and column consistent definitions, et cetera."

"The fitting model is very intuitive."

"The product lets us import different types of models from various databases."

"The product allows us to reuse entities and attributes."

"We can create mappings in erwin and possibly data dictionaries."

"Forward engineering, DDL generation, reverse engineering, and reporting are the most valuable features of the solution."

More erwin Data Modeler pros

"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."

"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."

Cons

"The solution's model mark could be better because it crashes sometimes."

"As someone who has used it for a long time, I have seen stability vary from version to version."

"In terms of new features, it would be great to have a cloud base. We should be able to put it on the cloud for better collaboration and data models sharing."

"I would like to see more support for working with the big-data world. There are so many new databases evolving and it's very hard for them to keep up with all of the new technologies. It would be good if they were able to dynamically support big-data platforms, other than Hive and Teradata."

"The only real complaint I have is the time it takes to do a database comparison on a large model. If they could speed that up, that would be the only thing I can think of that needs improvement."

"The report generation has room for improvement. I think it was version 8 where you had to use Crystal Reports, and it was so painful that the company I was with just stayed on version 7 until version 9 came out and they restored the data browser. That's better than it was, but it's still a little cumbersome. For example, you run it in erwin, then export it out to Excel, and then you have to do a lot of cosmetic modification. If you discover that you missed a column, then you would have to rerun the whole thing. Sometimes what you would do is just go ahead and fix it in the report, then you have to remember to go back and fix it in the model. Therefore, I think the report generation still could use some work."

"I would like the solution to be less rigid in terms of its theory."

"erwin generally fails to successfully reverse engineer our Oracle Databases into erwin data models. The way that they are engineered on our side, the syntax is correct from an Oracle perspective, but it seems to be very difficult for erwin to interpret. What I end up doing is using Oracle Data Modeler to reverse engineer into the Oracle data model, then forward engineer the DDL into an Oracle syntax, and importing that DDL into erwin in order to successfully bring in most of the information from our physical data models. That is a bit of a challenge."

More erwin Data Modeler cons

"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"Pricing is very high compared to any other product."

"The price should be lower in order to be on the same level as its competitors."

"The price of erwin Data Modeler is very expensive, in particular for this part of the world."

"Though the solution is not cheap, it's worth the money."

"There are two license options and the pricing is reasonable."

"Likewise, the solution is a little pricey."

More erwin Data Modeler pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

Forward engineering, DDL generation, reverse engineering, and reporting are the most valuable features of the solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

As a documenting tool, it's solid, though its reporting could be more robust. The reporting mechanisms could be more intuitive regarding report creation. It can generate reports in CSV files, displ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 36% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 18% of the time

Lucidchart vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 12% of the time

Visio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

More erwin Data Modeler Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 35% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 25% of the time

ARIS BPA vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 22% of the time

Bonita vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 18% of the time

More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Modeler

August 2025

Download erwin Data Modeler product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2025

Download QPR ProcessDesigner product report

Also Known As

erwin DM

ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide

Overview

Erwin Data Modeler provides an effective approach to visualizing and managing data models. It assists in creating, reversing, and synchronizing data models with ease, supporting logical and physical transitions while enhancing understanding across teams.

Erwin Data Modeler is a comprehensive tool designed for professional database management. It offers capabilities to organize and enforce standards, automating script generation with robust reverse engineering and DDL output. Users can manage complex data environments, capitalize on integration with data intelligence, and maintain large-scale databases smoothly. Despite its strengths, improvements in multi-language support, database integration, and reporting features are needed. Users benefit from extensive support for conceptual, logical, and physical database modeling, enhancing architectural design and data governance for platforms like SQL Server, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Erwin Data Modeler?

Visual Representation: Facilitates clear visualization of data models, aiding comprehension.
Versioning and Editing: Enhance usability with versioning and bulk editing capabilities.
Reverse Engineering: Offers powerful tools for reverse engineering and DDL generation.
Integration: Aligns with data intelligence to streamline database management.
Naming Standards: Enforces consistency with automated script creation.

What benefits should users consider in Erwin Data Modeler reviews?

Collaboration: Promotes team understanding and collaboration through visual tools.
Automation: Reduces manual effort through automated processes and integration.
Scalability: Handles large database management efficiently, crucial for enterprise settings.
Data Governance: Facilitates effective data governance with structured modeling.

Erwin Data Modeler finds application in industries focused on robust data management, implementing it for enterprise data warehouses, business domain models, and operational systems. It supports architectural design and governance, aligning with business applications demanding precise data representation and visualization.

Quest Software

Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

Premera, America Honda Motors, Aetna, Kaiser Permanente, Dental Dental Cali, Cigna, Staples

ALPLA

Buyer's Guide

QPR ProcessDesigner vs. erwin Data Modeler

July 2025

Free Report: QPR ProcessDesigner vs. erwin Data Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessDesigner vs. erwin Data Modeler and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QPR ProcessDesigner vs. erwin Data Modeler report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.