Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance comparison

Entrust Datacard and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5. Entrust Datacard holds a 0.8% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

316 Views
36 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Read 9 Microsoft Entra ID Governance reviews

465 Views
37 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Microsoft Entra ID Governance compete in the identity management and governance category. Microsoft Entra ID Governance appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features, including advanced governance tools, and seamless cloud-based deployment.

Features: Entrust Identity Enterprise provides secure authentication, identity verification, and versatile integration, matching with the CISA framework. Microsoft Entra ID Governance includes multi-factor authentication, access reviews, and privileged identity management, offering comprehensive security for enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Entrust could enhance its documentation and add more intuitive navigation options. It might also benefit from adding a real-time risk engine. Microsoft might improve its setup time and make external identity management more flexible. More user-friendly analytics could further elevate its offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Entra ID Governance is renowned for effortless cloud integration and comprehensive support. Entrust, while flexible in deployment, shines with efficient support and top-notch training, which supports various processes and systems.

Pricing and ROI: Entrust Identity Enterprise is appealing to cost-sensitive buyers with lower setup costs and quick ROI. Microsoft Entra ID Governance involves a higher initial investment but offers long-term value through extensive features suitable for large-scale environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (17th)

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is 1.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

William Kox

Azure Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Great policies and timelines for streamlined compliance

There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs. I cannot directly perform some tasks from the portal. First, I have to go to the policy, change it, and then return to the package to add it. I cannot do it directly from the package. Workarounds are needed, so that can be improved. At the moment, that is the only issue we are facing that needs enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"The most valuable features are multifactor authentication and account creation for the Exchange environment in Office 365."

"The solution gives me the capability to automatically move guest accounts from the tenant without any manual intervention."

"Access reviews are an essential feature of Entra Governance. Additionally, privileged identity management is one of its most valuable features. Just-in-time access, or Jet GIT, is integral to this system. Moreover, user behavior analytics stands out as one of its top features."

"It is compliant with our RVRT and CSV guidelines."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance for identity management is multi-factor authentication."

"The solution is fully scalable, supporting everything from small companies to large enterprises."

"I am very happy with the solution."

"The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance pros

Cons

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"The product's workflow approval process needs improvement."

"Microsoft has done a commendable job with RPAX. However, Microsoft should prioritize enhancing its ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) capabilities. Currently, Microsoft's ABAC offering falls behind AWS in comparison."

"The platform's configuration process needs improvement."

"Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."

"Bridging between on-premises and cloud services has the potential for improvement. For instance, it would be beneficial to be able to synchronize traditional directory schemas with Azure. I need to maintain an on-premises Active Directory server for certain required services."

"Microsoft Entra ID Governance is relatively new, and some features require more development. For example, when creating user access review campaigns, we can't specify the time to send emails to reviewers—only the date."

"Microsoft Entra ID Governance should improve its capability to manage identities and access from a single console."

"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"It's worth the money."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is not low but reasonable."

"There are no additional costs besides the standard licensing fees."

"In the education sector where I work, the annual cost for my Google and Microsoft environments is approximately $35,000. This covers the needs of 3,400 students and 800 faculty and staff members."

"While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Microsoft Entra ID Governance ( /categories/grc ) is relatively new, and some features require more development. For example, when creating user access review campaigns, we can't specify the time t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

I am using Microsoft Entra ID Governance ( /products/microsoft-entra-id-governance-reviews ) to integrate with our system. We control the joiner, mover, and leaver processes to enable auto provisio...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 70% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 23% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

June 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

May 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID Governance product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

No data available

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust Datacard

Microsoft Entra ID Governance empowers organizations with advanced identity management, security enforcement, and seamless access management across environments, offering robust multi-factor authentication and audit capabilities.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides comprehensive identity and security management through features like single sign-on and privileged identity management. It enhances user management with user behavior analytics, entitlement management, and access reviews while integrating on-premises solutions with cloud services like Office 365. By ensuring secure access and resource protection within Azure, organizations manage access, automate user access rules, and govern external identities effectively.

What features make Microsoft Entra ID Governance stand out?

Audit Trail Capabilities: Thorough tracking for security compliance.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhanced protection across platforms.
Single Sign-On: Efficient management across different systems.
Privileged Identity Management: Control just-in-time access with analytics.
Entitlement Management: Automate guest account management.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Enhanced Security: Strong authentication and auditing for secure environments.
Efficient User Management: Streamlined access processes through SSO.
Unified Identity Solutions: Integration with cloud and on-premises platforms.
Automated Access Rules: Reduced manual oversight with automation.

Financial services utilize Microsoft Entra ID Governance to protect sensitive data while automating user access rules and managing compliance. In education, it facilitates user account management and access provisioning for students and faculty, ensuring secure collaboration through Exchange and Teams.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

June 2025

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.